DJ_UFO said:Hey Matt do you still think there's any way to work together with Liberals? I think there isn't. But I'd like to hear some words of hope. lol
it is hard to work with anyone who clings to a belief system that is inherently person-hating. Make no mistake, liberalism is person hating. Someone like WODIN will probably come on here and say that liberals overcame decades of conservative suppression of sexuality etc., but they are wrong, those who did that were libertarians, despite their party affailitation. Today's liberalism by definition includes the concept of "wealth redistribution". This is anti-producer, and therefore person hating. You either must give up your wealth, or wait for someone else to provide for you.
Almost all of today's politicians have become liberal in this sense. Even "neo-con" (whatever that is) GW Bush authorized the highest ever federal budget and has provided more funding to Medicare and SS than any other President. he is actually seeking to expand these programs. Politics today is a game of trading voters.
Politicians almost always seek to expand government; it makes them more relevant. In order to expand government, you need a "reason". An external threat is one reason; there is a famous line from Hermann Goering about the ability to bring the will of the people to the mindset of the leader by using an external enemy. History is replete with this.
The other way to expand government is to identify problems and suggest public sector solutions. The problems do not have to be real, they just have to be perceived as real. The War on Drugs is a good example, so is Social Security, of this type of politics.
So it is not "liberals" per se that are the cause of any societal ills, rather, a government composed of individuals who, seeking to retain or expand power, consider only enlarging the government. Sadly, no one has yet found a rewind button.
There is no easy fix, but there are a few ideas that would go a long way,
(1) Term limits for Congressmen. Three terms, both houses.
(2) Give the president the line-item veto. This function can only be used to reduce spending; it harms no one. Create a line-item override, too.
too easy.