Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Abolish INHERITANCE....!!!

awww, how sweet ryan came out of his closet to answer the question.

i will repeat, at conception there is life, life is viable, therefore the fetus is alive, making it viable. here's one for you, i don't want to stick my nose into a womans body, i'll leave that to another organ of mine, lol. i think it's our of hand that we give the woman the right to someone else's life or death, yet the same people are against capital punishment. it's purely hypocritical. the NRA is not to blame for the gun related deaths in this country, the sorry no good scum that pull the triggers are the ones to blame. the NRA works hard to educate people on gun safety and to teach people the proper way to use and store a gun. you libs seem to overlook that and focus on their efforts to keep guns in the hands of those who are law abiding people and have no record mentally or criminally. i do think once you are a criminal or a mentally unstable person you should'nt be near a gun but i stand by the NRA and 2nd amendment right activists out there. tobacco, don't get me going. it's not their fault people smoke two packs a day and die 20 years later from cancer or other respiratory problems. it's people's choice to smoke, if the componies stopped any and all advertising people would stlill know what company is what and go buy it anyway. let's be logical here, banning stuff does'nt mean people won't get it anyway. the black market is alive and well today much as it was 50 years ago. ryan, you seek more government control over things, that is what the communist do, their government controls almost every aspect of their lives.

it's time to stop blaming others ryan for your(not your's personally) woes and shortcomings and take some responsibility for it. welfare should be taken and given back to the reitred folks for whom it was originally intended for but some dem president decided to give it to lazy folks who won't work or have 10 kids. sure let me support your babies, i'll give up some of my civil liberities to do so, haha busted yet again libies. if a man does'nt work should he eat? if he can't work then that is one thing but a person who is able to work, physically and mentally able, then they should get off their duff and work. here's a news flash for you, i'm below the poverty line by about 300 bucks, can i get some government asst? no way. why? simple, i work and "make too much money". what a lame excuse. ah well, i give up on trying to get you to see the light ryan, live in your dark little corner, i'll let someone else enlighten you or try to. it's hard to work miracles, lol.
 
Yeah, we should just give all inheritances to the United Scholarship Fund. That way any homie with a 2.0 avarage can go to college for free.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Re: Re: Re: Abolish INHERITANCE....!!!

KiTtEn WiTh A wHiP said:



I'd bloody well rather have my children have an inheritance than to leave it the bloody government! That's blood well right, governor! I'd much prefer my children to have houses they can blood right said Fred call their own rather than for Tony Blair to go out and buy another Tomahawk missile!

whats your deal????? are you really english?

I have never heard someone use bloody so many times?

:confused:
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Abolish INHERITANCE....!!!

OMEGA said:


whats your deal????? are you really english?

I have never heard someone use bloody so many times?

:confused:

I'm bloody sure it's May on the bloody rag.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Abolish INHERITANCE....!!!

musclebrains said:


It's an absurd question -- classic reduction to the either-or fallacy.

I think it's a very fair question. To be opposed to inheritance on the basis that it is not earned money means that you must also be opposed to welfare under it's general definition of free money for people who are able to work but are not employed.
 
RyanH said:
Inheritance is not a constitutional right, it's only a right granted by individual states......Further, inheritance is expensive since its taxed, and by giving the very wealthy the right to inherit the nation's wealth becomes controlled by the many of the same families, generation after generation.

I fear your tones are moving from Democratic liberalism to Democratic Socialism.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Abolish INHERITANCE....!!!

gymtime said:


I think it's a very fair question. To be opposed to inheritance on the basis that it is not earned money means that you must also be opposed to welfare under it's general definition of free money for people who are able to work but are not employed.

Well, if that's what welfare was, that might be a decent argument. But your "general definition" is pejorative. And by the way, the vast majority of people receiving government assistance DO work. This is one of the myths foisted on the public by conservatives.

Another is the bullcrap about "death taxes." The average American estate is NOT taxed, because the average American estate is small. The extremely wealthy have promoted the idea that there is a "death tax" when what there really is is a very heavy tax on very large estates for exactly the reason Ryan is advocating the end of inheritance. His position is not radical. It simply takes current thinking a step further.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Abolish INHERITANCE....!!!

musclebrains said:


His position is not radical. It simply takes current thinking a step further.

i dont think its radical, i think its liberalism. qiut taking peoples money from them just because you think you know whats best for them.

i'd much rather take steps backwards.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Abolish INHERITANCE....!!!

musclebrains said:


Another is the bullcrap about "death taxes." The average American estate is NOT taxed, because the average American estate is small. The extremely wealthy have promoted the idea that there is a "death tax" when what there really is is a very heavy tax on very large estates

its the heaviest tax there is and 625000 is not a very large estate.
 
Top Bottom