Imnotdutch
butler monkey
Why not just abolish inheritance altogether?.....espeically where the kids are concerned. Spouses have a role in building the inheritance sometimes so they can keep some.
If the kids knew that they werent going to get nadda from mommy and daddy they'd soon acquire a work ethic. Not to mention the fact that I'd like to see how those poor-little-rich-kids would compare to the rest of us if we started from the same level.
I think I'm about to go off on one so I'll stop now
If the kids knew that they werent going to get nadda from mommy and daddy they'd soon acquire a work ethic. Not to mention the fact that I'd like to see how those poor-little-rich-kids would compare to the rest of us if we started from the same level.
I think I'm about to go off on one so I'll stop now

RyanH said:Inheritance is not a constitutional right, it's only a right granted by individual states......Further, inheritance is expensive since its taxed, and by giving the very wealthy the right to inherit the nation's wealth becomes controlled by the many of the same families, generation after generation.
A truly capitalistic society should work for what it gets. Do third generation Rockefellers or third generation Kennedy's really work for what they've obtained? We know the answer. The great Tocqueville warned against dynastic wealth.
We should finally hear the call.......Allow proportional inheritance for minors and deserving spouses, but after a certain amount, the money should pour back into the hands of our great nation.
Sustaining true capitalism requires sustaining a work ethic. Much of the nation's wealthy have yet to recognize that ethic. Abolish inheritance!!!!
Ryan.