911 Conspiracy?

[spongebob]

No problemo



Isn't this the same type of data you claimed a few posts back couldn't be relied upon to yeild a conclusive determination of a bombing event?

Tell me you're not a backpeddler Mr spongebob square pants.

ok i found what you are referring to. someone breifly mentioned that the seismic recordings of the WTC are similar to that of a controlled demo. all i asked is how do we know what seismic activity the WTC would create if collapseing after what happened to it. i believe i said the very design of the building is unique in itself. and in the report im talking about it stated that the truck bomb and the demolition months later were similar but slightly different in activity. if there is an article or study of the siesmic activity of the WTC, maybe someone can post it or the link, id like to read it.

noone here has answered the obvious question. it is on tape, when the buildings are collapsing, they definitely appear to be collapsing from the top down, one floor falling on the next. in controlled demos, doesnt the blast happen near the bottom causing failure on support columns near the bottom, and then a domino effect of one floor coming down on the other.

in other words, if it were a controlled detonations, floor 2 falls on floor 1, floor 3 falls on floor 2/1, and floor 4 falls on floor3/2/1.

verses what appears to happen(backed up by many studies) floor 80(or whatever floor) fails and falls on floor 79, then floors 80/79 falls on floor 78, then floors 80/79/78 falls on floor 77. thats what appears to happen, a reverse of a controlled demo.

thats why they take out buildings with detonations close to the bottom. they assume its the only way to weaken the main support. it just so happens that the unique design of the WTC can be done from the top down.

 

[buddy28]

i have a link to an article that states the govt actually had a missile stored in the building, maybe there is some confusion about this. it did say that atf agents had to remove it.

hey, seriously. Watch Road to Tyranny. It doesn't matter if you think Alex Jones is a right wing, nut-job. He dedicates about 20-30 mins of the tape to mainstream media footage outtakes reporting on the 2 undetonated bombs removed from the building and multiple first person accounts testifying ATF agents had confessed they were told not to go into work that day.

 

[75th]

If you actually believe that whole controlled demo on the WTC story you really need to get a grip.

 

[Wazzup?]

hey, seriously. Watch Road to Tyranny. It doesn't matter if you think Alex Jones is a right wing, nut-job. He dedicates about 20-30 mins of the tape to mainstream media footage outtakes reporting on the 2 undetonated bombs removed from the building and multiple first person accounts testifying ATF agents had confessed they were told not to go into work that day.

I agree...at least watch the case he present's before trying to discredit him. If you are so right, what do you have to lose?

peace

 

[Forge]

If you actually believe that whole controlled demo on the WTC story you really need to get a grip.

Uh, so are you calling Silverstein a liar? He said it himself, it's on video, they "pulled" WTC7 only hours after the attack.

The question isn't whether or not WTC7 was a controlled demo, the question is how in the hell did they do it in record time and in the middle of a disaster zone? It doesn't add up.

 

[spongebob]

hey, seriously. Watch Road to Tyranny. It doesn't matter if you think Alex Jones is a right wing, nut-job. He dedicates about 20-30 mins of the tape to mainstream media footage outtakes reporting on the 2 undetonated bombs removed from the building and multiple first person accounts testifying ATF agents had confessed they were told not to go into work that day.

is it in links above, i will watch and read some more on that.

my first thought is why only some atf agent were told not to report, why not all of them. and then for those agents to confess. just sounds funny but i will read about it.

but please answer my question about the differences i explain in the manner of the WTC collapsing, from top down, not in the reverse like a contolled demo. im interested in your opinion.

 

[spongebob]

I agree...at least watch the case he present's before trying to discredit him. If you are so right, what do you have to lose?

peace

i have read some of the excerpts but i will look in to it further.

and if you are referring to me about being so right what do i have to lose, just let me clear it up, there is no way in the world that i can think i know what happened, i only can believe in what i think happened. and the same goes for you or anyone else here.

secondly, wasnt it you that tried to say something about the seismic data recorded during the collapse of the WTC? please answer my question with your opinion on what i said appears to be a reverse of a controlled demo of the WTC. from the top down. not the reverse.

 

[spongebob]

Uh, so are you calling Silverstein a liar? He said it himself, it's on video, they "pulled" WTC7 only hours after the attack.

The question isn't whether or not WTC7 was a controlled demo, the question is how in the hell did they do it in record time and in the middle of a disaster zone? It doesn't add up.

i believe the question is whether or not it was a controlled demo. yes he said, "lets pull it", but he also said "then we watched it fall". so the confusion is whether it fell on its own or it was a contolled demo.

either way, is there video of it falling? if so does it appear to fall from the bottom or from the top?

 

[Forge]

either way, is there video of it falling? if so does it appear to fall from the bottom or from the top?

Spongebob, not to be rude, but you really shouldn't be arguing with anyone here. It sounds like you haven't looked into any of this. Please do some research and report back.

 

[spongebob]

Spongebob, not to be rude, but you really shouldn't be arguing with anyone here. It sounds like you haven't looked into any of this. Please do some research and report back.

your not being rude, your just assumming, first im not arguing, secondly, i have not disputed or countered on any bodies belief that TWC7 was controlled or not. go and re-read the thread. anytime WTC 7 has come up in the converation ive just asked questions.

and it sounds like you have just scimmed thru the post on this thread. i have read pretty extensively on TWC and its design and possible reasons for failure. noone here as even come close to being able to answer my questions or counter my arguements.

most of you here believe WTC was controlled also and yet non of you answered my question about TWC actually appears to be falling.

please read material other than conspiracy sites and report back to me. and if you would please present and in depth analysis of 9-11 and i would be more than happy to counter your points.