Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

9/11 Part 2.............how many this time???

9/11 Part 2....how many this time???

  • Less than a 1000 will do it.

    Votes: 1 20.0%
  • 1000-5000...this worked last time.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 5000-10000.....much at stake here boys

    Votes: 2 40.0%
  • Over 10000....Islam has to go

    Votes: 2 40.0%

  • Total voters
    5
This is the plan that I see in my crystal ball. The PNAC has not brought their plan to fruition and need their lil telprompter reader for a few more years.

This right here will work:

Sell gas for 30-40% less in the months prior to the election.

"Capture" OBL who got paid untold amounts to take the rap for 9/11. Actually he will just step out of his palace for a few days.

Give Saddam Hussein a deal to say some choice words.

here is the clincher and I'm not convinced they are cold blooded enough to do it but I have been called naive. How many people will die in 9/11 Part 2 ???


I don't think they will do the last one because the economy just can't handle it and it would cost them too much money. But then I would not have guessed that Bldg 7 got pulled the afternoon of 9/11.....that news changed EVERYTHING.
 
Testosterone boy said:
But then I would not have guessed that Bldg 7 got pulled the afternoon of 9/11.....that news changed EVERYTHING.

CAn you verify that for me (building 7) - a link or speech or somethng?

Not doubting you, but I have some people I want to talk to that know stuff (serious) and I can't go to them with bullshit questions.
 
It's gonna come from "Right Field" this time! All the old stuff has been put "Under the Rug!"

I thought you knew about Bldg 7 a long time ago!

Anyways all the "code names" have been pushed around to long! Revenge started with the WMD but it's just about to open wide open in Virgina!
 
WHAT is the PNAC and what does building 7 "got pulled" mean???!?!?!?!?!

I think you mean they were going to build a building 7 and they "scrapped" the idea?
 
BucNateR said:
WHAT is the PNAC and what does building 7 "got pulled" mean???!?!?!?!?!

I think you mean they were going to build a building 7 and they "scrapped" the idea?

PNAC is project for a new american century. Do a web search.

Bldg 7 is oneof teh bldgs in the WTC complex...whichaccording to TBoy was demolished the same day the planes hit....the issue is how did they get the demo charges in there?
 
Re: Re: 9/11 Part 2.............how many this time???

MattTheSkywalker said:


CAn you verify that for me (building 7) - a link or speech or somethng?

Not doubting you, but I have some people I want to talk to that know stuff (serious) and I can't go to them with bullshit questions.
Hopefully this works:
http://fyleserva.com/video/911/alex analysis wtc7.WMV

Hmmmm....didn't work though it looks the same as the link posted by big bad buff in his huge thread about possible government involvement in 9/11 which I just bumped.

The video from the first post is lenghty by pretty well done and interesting as hell.

One may forget their feelings about the controversial Alex and focus on the tape of Silverstein where he says they made a decision to "pull" bldg 7 that afternoon. A pull is a controlled demolition for the guy who asked.
 
Last edited:
I thought that the jist was how many more deaths would the US cause to give them the pretext for war again.
 
BucNateR said:
so the jist of this thread is how many before the US wakes up and does something?
No......not at all.

it is about convincing the public that they are under attack and we need to retaliate and keep a war mongering teleprompter reader in office.
 
ouch.

Read this:

(CBS) CBS News has learned that barely five hours after American Airlines Flight 77 plowed into the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld was telling his aides to come up with plans for striking Iraq — even though there was no evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the attacks...

With the intelligence all pointing toward bin Laden, Rumsfeld ordered the military to begin working on strike plans. And at 2:40 p.m., the notes quote Rumsfeld as saying he wanted "best info fast. Judge whether good enough hit S.H." – meaning Saddam Hussein – "at same time. Not only UBL" – the initials used to identify Osama bin Laden...

"Go massive," the notes quote him as saying. "Sweep it all up. Things related and not."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/04/september11/main520830.shtml


Who benefited and how?

One key is controlled demolition of building 7 as it documents near irrefutable proof charges were laid prior to 9/11. If that's indeed the case, explicit foreknowledge at some level is almost certain.

If I wanted to play the role of detective, I'd take a *very* close look at Silverstein's background. A man with that kind of money would likely have powerful friends - perhaps even in the Mossad...


Israeli security issued urgent warning to CIA of large-scale terror attacks
By David Wastell in Washington and Philip Jacobson in Jerusalem
(Filed: 16/09/2001)

"ISRAELI intelligence officials say that they warned their counterparts in the United States last month that large-scale terrorist attacks on highly visible targets on the American mainland were imminent...

The Telegraph has learnt that two senior experts with Mossad, the Israeli military intelligence service, were sent to Washington in August to alert the CIA and FBI to the existence of a cell of as many of 200 terrorists said to be preparing a big operation."

http://portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/16/wcia16.xml
 
buddy28 said:
ouch.

Read this:

(CBS) CBS News has learned that barely five hours after American Airlines Flight 77 plowed into the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld was telling his aides to come up with plans for striking Iraq — even though there was no evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the attacks...

With the intelligence all pointing toward bin Laden, Rumsfeld ordered the military to begin working on strike plans. And at 2:40 p.m., the notes quote Rumsfeld as saying he wanted "best info fast. Judge whether good enough hit S.H." – meaning Saddam Hussein – "at same time. Not only UBL" – the initials used to identify Osama bin Laden...

"Go massive," the notes quote him as saying. "Sweep it all up. Things related and not."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/04/september11/main520830.shtml


Who benefited and how?

One key is controlled demolition of building 7 as it documents near irrefutable proof charges were laid prior to 9/11. If that's indeed the case, explicit foreknowledge at some level is almost certain.

If I wanted to play the role of detective, I'd take a *very* close look at Silverstein's background. A man with that kind of money would likely have powerful friends - perhaps even in the Mossad...


Israeli security issued urgent warning to CIA of large-scale terror attacks
By David Wastell in Washington and Philip Jacobson in Jerusalem
(Filed: 16/09/2001)

"ISRAELI intelligence officials say that they warned their counterparts in the United States last month that large-scale terrorist attacks on highly visible targets on the American mainland were imminent...

The Telegraph has learnt that two senior experts with Mossad, the Israeli military intelligence service, were sent to Washington in August to alert the CIA and FBI to the existence of a cell of as many of 200 terrorists said to be preparing a big operation."

http://portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/16/wcia16.xml
Still some things that don't add up.

The Mossad knew and Silverstein knew.....there is no doubt.

My question is why were people instructed to stay within the towers and why were demolition charges planted in bldg 7 prior to 9/11. In addition, I have to be a realist and say that the preponderance of evidence points to the main towers also being controlled demolitions.


We wanted the Iraqi oilfileds and Israeli interests wanted to waste Iraq.

My question is also how did OBL play into the hands of everybody including the Israelis. He is portrayed as being a devout MUslim. I think this may be nonsense. Not too many billionaires are truly devout.
 
Testosterone boy said:
Still some things that don't add up.

The Mossad knew and Silverstein knew.....there is no doubt.

My question is why were people instructed to stay within the towers and why were demolition charges planted in bldg 7 prior to 9/11. In addition, I have to be a realist and say that the preponderance of evidence points to the main towers also being controlled demolitions.


We wanted the Iraqi oilfileds and Israeli interests wanted to waste Iraq.

My question is also how did OBL play into the hands of everybody including the Israelis. He is portrayed as being a devout MUslim. I think this may be nonsense. Not too many billionaires are truly devout.

If the so called "Muslim Fanatics Sheeple" woke up they would behead Osama! He is a joke for a devot muslim! But hey everyones got their own form of Sheeple! Some lead, some follow and the rest of us have to clean up their fucking mess!

Iraq was in the works since the end of gulf in the Bush doctrine! No big secret there!

lol it's funny how so many people are waking up now and I don't even seem like a big nut job anymore! That's why I have laid off of the Sheeple intl and preaching as of late! :D

But it's only the tip of the Iceberg!

http://boards.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=239747&highlight=Bush+doctrine

http://boards.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=215531&highlight=frontline

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/iraq/
 
Testosterone boy said:

and why were demolition charges planted in bldg 7 prior to 9/11.

Exactly. Is that possible? If its not possible, then foreknowledge is practically guaranteed.


Testosterone boy said:
My question is also how did OBL play into the hands of everybody including the Israelis. He is portrayed as being a devout MUslim. I think this may be nonsense. Not too many billionaires are truly devout.

I think Bin Laden was/is a legitimate threat whose assaults - when allowed - provide the rational justification for initiating war. Which essentially advances the PNAC agenda and *heavily* benefits those with extensive defense-oil-rebuilding industry connections (read: Carlyle Group and everyone directly related).

He's a convenient threat. A controlled patsy.
 
TESTBOY...you nailed it....Iam with you 100%....we did it...no one else....the other players are pawns....
 
it's amazing who's in on this conspiracy. all of the police and firemen who were using building 7 as base of operations must be in on it, as well as every other government agent stationed in the building. man the government really has gotten its shit together in keeping this all airtight. they must be getting some good cash in return since nobody has come out revealing inside info.
 
and the probability factor that some billionare oil tycoon from the middle east- was privey to all this info, and decided to blow it all up....???? with a couple of jets??? IMO- never bought any of this middle east terroist shit...
 
Last edited:
PIGEON-RAT said:
it's amazing who's in on this conspiracy. all of the police and firemen who were using building 7 as base of operations must be in on it, as well as every other government agent stationed in the building. man the government really has gotten its shit together in keeping this all airtight. they must be getting some good cash in return since nobody has come out revealing inside info.
You seem pretty defensive.

Now that it isa proven that Silverstein took over the WTC lease in August 2001 and ordered that bldg 7 be pulled the afternoon of 9/11, I really don't see why anyone tries to stick with the official story.

Silverstein is on TAPE saying that he pulled bldg 7 that afternoon. The charges HAD TO BE PLANTED PRIOR TO 9/11!!!!!


I'll bet there are lots of firemen with a great deal to say but our media ignores stories that don't suit a certain agenda. :)
 
Top Bottom