Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Are SARMs really any safer than AAS?

powerup79

powerup79

Good Broly
Platinum
I know people like to spew that SARMs are safer than AAS but where is the real world evidence of this? Steroids have been around for about 100 years we know a lot about them we truly don't know the effects of SARMs long term.

For example let's say someone on just normal TRT adds in 30/mg a day of Ostarine that's 210/mg a week if that same person takes 200mg of Primo I'd contest the Primo would yield a better return with more predictable and healthier bloodwork.

Thoughts?

Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
 
powerup79 said:
I know people like to spew that SARMs are safer than AAS but where is the real world evidence of this? Steroids have been around for about 100 years we know a lot about them we truly don't know the effects of SARMs long term.

For example let's say someone on just normal TRT adds in 30/mg a day of Ostarine that's 210/mg a week if that same person takes 200mg of Primo I'd contest the Primo would yield a better return with more predictable and healthier bloodwork.

Thoughts?

Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Well sarms are safer than steroids for sure
Especially the ones studied like ostarine stenabolic lgd etc

i cant compare primobolan to ostarine no comparison there

but i can tell you many sarms are completely safe and have great positive effects

i would add sarms to all cycles even trt, i do already that actually
adding cardarine gw 20mgs and ostarine mk 50mgs
 
you have to remember in both situations we are running PED dosages

example with steroids proper TRT is only 100mg a week. well for cycles we use 500mg plus more steroids

sarms is the same way. the PED dosages are 5-10X what they were supposed to be.

overall is any of it safe? if you use them properly cycling on and off then you can use them for the long term. if you abuse then thats different
 
powerup79 said:
I know people like to spew that SARMs are safer than AAS but where is the real world evidence of this? Steroids have been around for about 100 years we know a lot about them we truly don't know the effects of SARMs long term.

For example let's say someone on just normal TRT adds in 30/mg a day of Ostarine that's 210/mg a week if that same person takes 200mg of Primo I'd contest the Primo would yield a better return with more predictable and healthier bloodwork.

Thoughts?

Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Better return? Yes. Safer... look at the actual studies to see side effects
 
Vadim Fedorov said:
Without a doubt sarms are safer
Click to expand...
That's kind of my point "without a doubt SARMs are safer" is the general sentiment but where are the studies to prove such a claim? Where is compared bloodwork? Truth is such does not exist and is only believed because it's been said over and over and anyone will believe anything and pass it on of you say it enough.

Full disclaimer: I'm currently running just 30/mg Ostarine so I can't wait to compare my bloodwork to my last year's run of a full gram of Primo...

Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
 
Tiger Salman Khan said:
Sarms are safer.....no doubt in this....
Click to expand...
But where are the studies? Where is the evidence?

My point was we all, including myself, say "SARMs are safer, no question" but the evidence does not seem to exist.

The argument might be steroids are more likely to be used in abusive dosages and on that they aren't as safe...

Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
 
This is a fantastic question and you are absolutely right......steroids have been around so much longer so we have many more studies to look at. I think a lot of it is dose dependent as well as how long you run them. For me, I feel like there is somewhat of a "safer" route with SARMs due to the lack of androgenic activity.
 
MasonicBodybuilder said:
This is a fantastic question and you are absolutely right......steroids have been around so much longer so we have many more studies to look at. I think a lot of it is dose dependent as well as how long you run them. For me, I feel like there is somewhat of a "safer" route with SARMs due to the lack of androgenic activity.
Click to expand...
Iv seen some ugly bloodwork from LGD and RAD, hell if your taking S23 you might as well take fn Tren... lol...

Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
 
powerup79 said:
I know people like to spew that SARMs are safer than AAS but where is the real world evidence of this? Steroids have been around for about 100 years we know a lot about them we truly don't know the effects of SARMs long term.

For example let's say someone on just normal TRT adds in 30/mg a day of Ostarine that's 210/mg a week if that same person takes 200mg of Primo I'd contest the Primo would yield a better return with more predictable and healthier bloodwork.

Thoughts?

Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
Click to expand...



Check out our podcast all about SARMS where we cover this very topic in-depth and others:



SARMS Wrap up show
https://www.evolutionary.org/evolutionary-org-podcast-360-sarms-wrap-up-show/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

rdm1
PSL - 🦅..IT'S HERE, IT'S REALLY HERE.. 🦅TRT blend LOCALLY by PSL..🦅 Can you believe it? TRT BLEND IS LOCAL🦅
Replies
1
Views
904
RoidRage69
RoidRage69
~Vision~
PSL Sale The original inventors of the TRT blend - We did it first "TRT 200/200" 400
Replies
19
Views
2K
MUSTANG_18
MUSTANG_18
Macedog24
PuritySourceLabs TRT Blend (Test/Mast 200/200) 💉🩸"WE WILL PAY FOR YOUR BLOOD WORK"💉🩸
Replies
12
Views
2K
Noah Wixx
Noah Wixx
matt88
PSL Sale Purity Source Labs TRT blend will soon be "permanently" discontinued once sold out.. Buy it now before it's gone
Replies
18
Views
3K
25homes
25homes
matt88
PuritySourceLabs IT'S HERE, IT'S REALLY HERE.. TRT blend DOMESTIC by PSL..
Replies
2
Views
599
Macedog24
Macedog24
Top Bottom