Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Does anyone know how to plot Fourier series coefficent expansions in Maple?

I think they sometimes feel compelled (or have an agenda) to fill-in the blanks when there really isn't enough information to give a complete answer.

I don't think the SCOTUS justices have that much of an agenda. They've spent decades devoting their lives to legal analysis and constitutional interpretation. They have a belief in how the constitution should be read, and they stick to it even if the result is more liberal or conservative than you would expect. That is what I love about them. I've read cases where Scalia and Ginsburg write the Dissent together. Or where Scalia is all about preserving privacy interests and limiting the scope of warrantless searches and Stevens is saying that a warrantless search should be allowed in that particular situation. I've read cases where the originalists' attention to text and history creates an asinine result. Sometimes the living document opinions make the most sense. I think that might be why I like the fence straddlers the most.
 
when i did integration on maple the 3d drawings would make the piece of shit WPI lab computer mad slow
 
The question would be whether a law banning stem cell research would be constitutional.

The heart of the matter was the method of extraction of stem cells. We apparently found a way to regress adult stem cells into embryonic ones. The issue should be solved now.

washingtonpost.com
 
I blame those conservative bastards. They whine about everything!



:cow:

Yup! They forced scientists into coming-up with a non-controversial source of stem cells! I bet it set research back a solid month or so.

Those bastages!
 
Yup! They forced scientists into coming-up with a non-controversial source of stem cells! I bet it set research back a solid month or so.

Those bastages!


You have a very disctinct way of hyphening words that probably haven't been hyphenated since 1830. I find this very interesting. Where did you pick this up?



:cow:
 
You have a very disctinct way of hyphening words that probably haven't been hyphenated since 1830. I find this very interesting. Where did you pick this up?



:cow:

I'm not sure where I picked it up.

And unless I consciously stop and catch it, I'll also use an extra comma in lists. For example, I'll say: "We looked into our first, second, and third options in this situation."

100 years ago, I would have been bang-on correct, too!
 
Top Bottom