Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

Planet could be "unrecognizable" in less than 40 years

hanselthecaretaker

High End Bro
Platinum
WASHINGTON (AFP) – A growing, more affluent population competing for ever scarcer resources could make for an "unrecognizable" world by 2050, researchers warned at a major US science conference Sunday.

The United Nations has predicted the global population will reach seven billion this year, and climb to nine billion by 2050, "with almost all of the growth occurring in poor countries, particularly Africa and South Asia," said John Bongaarts of the non-profit Population Council.

To feed all those mouths, "we will need to produce as much food in the next 40 years as we have in the last 8,000," said Jason Clay of the World Wildlife Fund at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
"By 2050 we will not have a planet left that is recognizable" if current trends continue, Clay said.

The swelling population will exacerbate problems, such as resource depletion, said John Casterline, director of the Initiative in Population Research at Ohio State University.
But incomes are also expected to rise over the next 40 years -- tripling globally and quintupling in developing nations -- and add more strain to global food supplies.

People tend to move up the food chain as their incomes rise, consuming more meat than they might have when they made less money, the experts said.

It takes around seven pounds (3.4 kilograms) of grain to produce a pound of meat, and around three to four pounds of grain to produce a pound of cheese or eggs, experts told AFP.

"More people, more money, more consumption, but the same planet," Clay told AFP, urging scientists and governments to start making changes now to how food is produced.

Population experts, meanwhile, called for more funding for family planning programs to help control the growth in the number of humans, especially in developing nations.

"For 20 years, there's been very little investment in family planning, but there's a return of interest now, partly because of the environmental factors like global warming and food prices," said Bongaarts.

"We want to minimize population growth, and the only viable way to do that is through more effective family planning," said Casterline.

Planet could be 'unrecognizable' by 2050, experts say - Yahoo! News

Apparently fucking up the planet is a side effect of being an "advanced" species. I guess this makes the decision to not have kids a little easier lol. Maybe we're about due for another WW too.
 
Apparently fucking up the planet is a side effect of being an "advanced" species. I guess this makes the decision to not have kids a little easier lol. Maybe we're about due for another WW too.

hahaha i was thinking the same thing. maybe another epidemic plague? next we should just colonize the moon
 
I'm not that worried about agricultural productivity. Over 100 years ago, over 50% of the US population was involved in agriculture yet we barely fed ourselves. Today, less than 2% of the US population is involved in agriculture and we are a net food exporter.

We are overdue for a pandemic. And considering our increased population density and freedom to travel, it could be a really bad one.

But my guess is that nuclear proliferation will eventually lead to some man-made disaster that screws-up the atmosphere and/or water.
 
I'm thinking ball lightening will take out a couple billion, just like the Ark of the Covenant's balls took out those Nazis.
 
Top Bottom