ceasar989 said:
I was wondering though, do you think it would be bad to always use this method, because i dont want to go back to the shitty old ways of iso exercises, i love this shit?
Really great results - I'm going to copy and link it to the 5x5 thread just so that others can see it. Great job on executing - you can definitely take some pride in that work.
This is a fairly ideal style of program. Dual factor (loading/deloading) is the way to train as is focusing on the exercises that provide 95% of the progress and not diluting your limited recovery with the other 5% unless they specifically address a weak point. As to different ways to do it here is another example of a dual factor program. It might be beneficial to run the 5x5 one more time before starting this one but this is a very solid program and fits within a single mesocycle so it makes for a great 4 week run. Also, a lot of people who have used the 3 day Intensity program end up acutally getting reloaded again by the final week. A separate deloading week (2 workouts light weight just basic exercises - no exercise more than once) might prove a helpful break in between. Go to Post #3 in this Topic:
http://forum.mesomorphosis.com/show...php?t=134233013
As for the powershrugs - they probably fit into the 5x5 best this way which is similar to the way Bill Starr originally set it up as he had Power Cleans on M/F instead of rows. Substitute them for bent rows but in doing this I recommend that you pull the weight from just above knee level as this makes it more of a full body exercise (like a clean grip high pull from the hang position).
EDIT: Another alternative is that if the loading you used wasn't horrible on you this time you might be able to fit them in as assistance work doing 3x8-12 on M/F. Just don't get more aggressive with the loading if you do this. Ideally you want to peg the weight dead on so both week 3 and 4 are record lifts based on pertinent maxes (most people won't have those but you will because you've just completed the program). Adjust for your maxes (maybe plan on near record in week 3 - if you got a lot stronger from the 3x3 though your new records may have moved up substantially) but play the ramps conservatively (meaning don't rachet them up hard) and see how it goes. Note- you are not maxing the powershrug under this structure, it's just basic assistance work during the program.
Also, you can begin to think about longer programs and structures to address specific needs. The 5x5 is basically 2 mesocycles (4 weeks each but they can range from 3-6 weeks). For reference a microcycle is 1-2 weeks (or look at a macrocycle as 4 semirelated microcycles although this is unnecessary for the 5x5 program or anything that general) and a Macrocycle is closer to a year and this is what I'm getting at although for a non-competitive lifter it's unnecessary to plan to that degree. Anyway, you are looking at stringing together a series of meso/micro cycles into an abbreviated macrocycle (yeah a lot of bullshit terms but you'll see the sense).
So, assuming you wanted to run 2 5x5s back to back (we'll just assume you will deload a week and start at the next one) and then continue into the other dual factor program (DFHT) and for the sake of fun you wanted to run a two week specialty program to address something else before beginning the core 5x5 again you'd have something like this:
Mesocycle 1:........................5x5 Loading
Mesocycle 2: Microcycle 1:.....5x5 Deload Week
Mesocycle 2: Microcycles 2-5:.5x5 Intensity Weeks
Microcycle 1 (separate):.........Deloading - 1 week
Mesocycle 3: Microcycles 1-3:.DFHT Loading
Mesocycle 3: Micocycle 4:.......DFHT Deloading
Microcycle 2 (separate):..........Specialty work - 2 weeks
Repeat
This is roughly 4 months or 16 weeks
This is really kind of rough and the numbering is a bit confusing but it illustrates how you want to handle this stuff and the type of framework under which you want to plan your training. This is also why a training log and really knowing your tolerances (they will build gradually over time) is invaluable.