You want your drugs back? Vote Ron Paul!

[jaybois]

they did know of it, they had written threats from these people. supposedly that is. but i believe the us govt took those buildings down to gain support for the war. just as they did in the past.

3 buildings don't fall into their own basements in perfect neat piles and one of them wasn't even hit by a plane and it just comes down at free fall speed. look at the molten metal in the basements 6 weeks later, jet fuel does not melt steel like that. i work in an oil refinery that has had numerous explosions. shot a whole flare tower, 200' tall, over a mile away, and worst they had was twisted and contorted ibeams which are nowhere near the size of the beams in those buildings. and yes, it is jet fuel, the refinery i work at makes jet fuel and very high octane racing fuel. look at the ibeams sticking out of the wreckage in the videos all with perfect 45 degree cuts with slag all over them from where the thermite cut them. if the so called "terrorists" blew them buildings up then why is our govt lieing to us saying planes took them down.

they think we are all stupid. they think we're not paying attention and they got away with it. too much technology today, this isn't another jfk. there's enough video and internet access and common sense. ask yourself why the building 7 fell when it wasn't even hit by a plane. how did the buildings disintegrate and why did they immedietly take all the steel out into the ocean and melt it down. all evidence destroyed as fast as possible.

bottom line, keep spreading the word about ron paul.

Why did NORAD stand down also.

 

[skacorica]

they did know of it, they had written threats from these people. supposedly that is. but i believe the us govt took those buildings down to gain support for the war. just as they did in the past.

3 buildings don't fall into their own basements in perfect neat piles and one of them wasn't even hit by a plane and it just comes down at free fall speed. look at the molten metal in the basements 6 weeks later, jet fuel does not melt steel like that. i work in an oil refinery that has had numerous explosions. shot a whole flare tower, 200' tall, over a mile away, and worst they had was twisted and contorted ibeams which are nowhere near the size of the beams in those buildings. and yes, it is jet fuel, the refinery i work at makes jet fuel and very high octane racing fuel. look at the ibeams sticking out of the wreckage in the videos all with perfect 45 degree cuts with slag all over them from where the thermite cut them. if the so called "terrorists" blew them buildings up then why is our govt lieing to us saying planes took them down.

they think we are all stupid. they think we're not paying attention and they got away with it. too much technology today, this isn't another jfk. there's enough video and internet access and common sense. ask yourself why the building 7 fell when it wasn't even hit by a plane. how did the buildings disintegrate and why did they immedietly take all the steel out into the ocean and melt it down. all evidence destroyed as fast as possible.

bottom line, keep spreading the word about ron paul.

you're a good bro, but seriously man....instead of making a huge post, read this: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

 

[redguru]

gawd, how did this degenerate into a Reynolds Wrap haberdashery thread? Many threads debunking all those loose change theories have been played out. I lost friends at the Pentagon, and I think anyone who gives those theories credence is a sack of shit.

 

[jaybois]

you're a good bro, but seriously man....instead of making a huge post, read this: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/161007_nist_admits.htm We could do this all day.

 

[humble]

A democratic congress would never repeal the anabolic androgenic steroids laws it passed. And if he won do you think he would be really be allowed to dismantle the huge organizations that exist only to swallow your tax dollars, with congress and his own party going against him all the time?

At least it is a start, imagine if a politician could have the AAS body following him with their votes. Is this stupid thinking? How many use? I have stats of somewhere in the range of 1 million. Is this somewhat possible?

 

[skacorica]

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/161007_nist_admits.htm We could do this all day.

No because my proof is based on facts, your proof is based on this fallacy:

"implicitly acknowledging that controlled demolition is the only means by which the buildings could have come down."

To say that that is implicit knowledge is like for me to say:

"The laws of quantum physics do not completely explain the seeming appearance and disappearance of matter therefore it is aliens making things come into existence"

Being unable to prove A = B or A = C does NOT imply that A = D.

 

[jagerbombme]

back on point, we all want ron paul

 

[jaybois]

No because my proof is based on facts, your proof is based on this fallacy:

"implicitly acknowledging that controlled demolition is the only means by which the buildings could have come down."

To say that that is implicit knowledge is like for me to say:

"The laws of quantum physics do not completely explain the seeming appearance and disappearance of matter therefore it is aliens making things come into existence"

Being unable to prove A = B or A = C does NOT imply that A = D.

You proved nothing nor did i.

 

[jaybois]

No because my proof is based on facts, your proof is based on this fallacy:

"implicitly acknowledging that controlled demolition is the only means by which the buildings could have come down."

To say that that is implicit knowledge is like for me to say:

"The laws of quantum physics do not completely explain the seeming appearance and disappearance of matter therefore it is aliens making things come into existence"

Being unable to prove A = B or A = C does NOT imply that A = D.

Another good read that goes after your facts.http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/100806popularmechanics.htm

 

[skacorica]

You proved nothing nor did i.

You proved you have no idea what a fallacious argument is. Anyway this isn't the place for debating conspiracy theories. Create a thread in CC if you want to do that.