Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

You think US health coverage sucks?

Dial_tone

MVP
EF VIP
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/10/15/england.dentists/index.html

LONDON, England (CNN) -- Some English people have resorted to pulling out their own teeth because they cannot find -- or cannot afford -- a dentist, a major study has revealed.

Six percent of those surveyed in an English study said they had resorted to dental "self-treatment."

Six percent of those questioned in a survey of 5,000 patients admitted they had resorted to self-treatment using pliers and glue, the UK's Press Association reported.

England has a two-tier dental care system with some dentists offering publicly subsidized treatment through the National Health Service and others performing more expensive private work.

But more than three-quarters of those polled said they had been forced to pay for private treatment because they had been unable to find an NHS dentist. Almost a fifth said they had refused dental treatment because of the cost.

One respondent in Lancashire, northern England, claimed to have extracted 14 of their own teeth with a pair of pliers. In Liverpool, one of those collecting data for the survey interviewed three people who had pulled out their own teeth in one morning.

"I took most of my teeth out in the shed with pliers. I have one to go," another respondent wrote.

Others said they had fixed broken crowns using glue to avoid costly dental work.

Valerie Halsworth, 64, told British television's GMTV she had removed seven of her own teeth using her husband's pliers when her toothache became unbearable and she was unable to find an NHS dentist willing to treat her.

Halsworth admitted that the first extraction had been "excruciatingly painful." But she added: "It got that painful that I just had to do something... When you have taken a tooth out... the pain has gone."

Sharon Grant, chair of the Commission for Patient and Public Involvement in Health, which commissioned the survey, said: "These findings indicate that the NHS dental system is letting many patients down very badly.

"Where NHS dental services are available, people are happy with the quality of treatment provided but many find the NHS fee system confusing and expensive, with some patients taking out loans to pay for treatment or more worryingly taking matters into their own hands."
 
but at least they are safe from people with guns..

all they need to worry about is people with bombs on their bodies..
 
I saw on the news last week that Canada was sending their high risk pregnancy patients to Washington State, because they don't have enough facilities to handle them.
Canada is the liberal model of what American health care should be like.
 
SpyWizard said:
but at least they are safe from people with guns..

all they need to worry about is people with bombs on their bodies..

Not true. Guns are still a problem in the UK. Now only criminals have guns and the innocent are forced to protect themselves with nothing.
Excerpt:
England: According to the BBC News, handgun crime in the United Kingdom rose by 40% in the two years after it passed its draconian gun ban in 1997.4

http://www.gunowners.org/sk0703.htm

It is really bad in Australia right now too because they passes stringent gun laws. I won't even get into South Africa...
 
But...but... the UK has universal healthcare?

Doesn't that mean it has to be better than the mean-spirited US system by definition?

You guys must not be compassionate enough to want free everything for everyone.
 
Powerbuilder333 said:
I saw on the news last week that Canada was sending their high risk pregnancy patients to Washington State, because they don't have enough facilities to handle them.
Canada is the liberal model of what American health care should be like.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2007/05/25/bc-mothers.html

Nearly three dozen new mothers-to-be have been sent from B.C. to Alberta or Washington state so far this year by the Provincial Health Services Authority because of a shortage of beds in B.C. hospitals.

A spokesman for the PHSA said the transfers happen when there are "surges" of high-risk, neo-natal intensive care needs that can't be handled in Vancouver.

More than likely, these bed shortages are only temporary. The government would probably save money in the long-run by increasing capacity at home, as opposed to sending these patients elsewhere. And remember, we're only talking 3 dozen patients here--that's not a huge number.

Fidel Castro <[email protected]>
PGP Key: 0x9703892
Fingerprint: CFF2 9E40 8C8B 8A03 14DB D51C 44A2 2578 0970 3892
 
Top Bottom