21gun New member Jul 30, 2006 #1 click this link to see their comparison on backs'. http://www.kulturistika.com/picturesweb/porovnani/porovnani9.jpg
click this link to see their comparison on backs'. http://www.kulturistika.com/picturesweb/porovnani/porovnani9.jpg
J jca1 New member Aug 3, 2006 #4 Yates looks better in those pics, but that is a comp. pic of yates. Coleman doesn't seem to be pumped, it kind of looks like a natural pic of him.(no pump). Arnold looks like he's holding water from the d-bol. lol.....
Yates looks better in those pics, but that is a comp. pic of yates. Coleman doesn't seem to be pumped, it kind of looks like a natural pic of him.(no pump). Arnold looks like he's holding water from the d-bol. lol.....
D DieselGunz New member Aug 4, 2006 #6 dorain has the thickness for sure, coleman might have more width tho
norsemuscle New member Aug 18, 2006 #10 Ilovetolift said: COlemans back looks better, all three have same mass id say. Click to expand... Get your eyes checked, Ronnie Coleman has the 2nd best back of all time, his conditioning has never been on par with Dorian. Ronnie has Yates in most other things but I believe Dorian has better Calves, Back, Traps, Glutes. Everything else Ronnie is better. Last edited: Aug 18, 2006
Ilovetolift said: COlemans back looks better, all three have same mass id say. Click to expand... Get your eyes checked, Ronnie Coleman has the 2nd best back of all time, his conditioning has never been on par with Dorian. Ronnie has Yates in most other things but I believe Dorian has better Calves, Back, Traps, Glutes. Everything else Ronnie is better.