worst side effects from year round?

[markshark]

for example if coming off of a cycle i bridge for 8 weeks with 200mg/test then jump back on a cycle, come off and bridge, jump back on, etc, for a year what are the most harmful side effects of doing this?

 

[Pat_McCrotch]

Didnt think you could bridge with test. i thought the whole theory of bridging was to take somethings that only suppressed and not shut you down like test does. but I am curious to hear what the good bros say about being on year round. id like ot know.

 

[genman]

for example if coming off of a cycle i bridge for 8 weeks with 200mg/test then jump back on a cycle, come off and bridge, jump back on, etc, for a year what are the most harmful side effects of doing this?

Lipid profile may never come back to normal. Also, your natural test production will never come all the way back due to constant suppression. Other than that, I have no problems.

 

[td1111]

You guys are nuts for even considering this.

 

[ironclaw]

for example if coming off of a cycle i bridge for 8 weeks with 200mg/test then jump back on a cycle, come off and bridge, jump back on, etc, for a year what are the most harmful side effects of doing this?

using 200 mg for a 8 week bridge is basically doing HRT isn't it? YOur natty test levels will be nonexistent basically, if you do not do a PCT. As far as side effects from doing this, probably not much other than a messed up lipid profile, and it might mess with your libido..

 

[jagerbombme]

using 200 mg for a 8 week bridge is basically doing HRT isn't it? YOur natty test levels will be nonexistent basically, if you do not do a PCT - post cycle therapy - . As far as side effects from doing this, probably not much other than a messed up lipid profile, and it might mess with your libido..

wouldn't it only mess up your lipids due to orals, injects don't really affect lipids do they?

 

[hrpiii]

for example if coming off of a cycle i bridge for 8 weeks with 200mg/test then jump back on a cycle, come off and bridge, jump back on, etc, for a year what are the most harmful side effects of doing this?

seeing women that you would normally stay away from and think to yourself, yep, I'd hit that today. I think that is the worst side effect. Being on Test all the time seems to cloud your judgement of really hot women, and anything that is breathing with a .

 

[solidspine]

You guys are nuts for even considering this.

Actually the majority of professional body builders and those that appear to be professional are on year round, so they are not nuts,

This is also true for professional athletes – simply on 24/7 365 days a year.


Some people are just not very well informed or un- aware of reality.



The biggest side affects are not really side affects, as you age, gains become increasingly difficult.

Your first cycle you may add 15-20 lbs of muscle, your second 5-10 lbs of muscle,


After 10 years it is almost impossible to gain 15-20 lbs of muscle, gear, genetics, training, rest, diet all considered.


As you creep up on 60, saving your muscle is 90 percent of what people are doing.

 

[genman]

wouldn't it only mess up your lipids due to orals, injects don't really affect lipids do they?

Yes they do, although not to the same extent. It usually affects mine by about 50 points being on just test @ 200mg/ew.

 

[bikercoz]

You guys are nuts for even considering this.

Why??? You could certainly make a case that it is no worse than cycling on several times a year and then trying to kick start your balls at the end of each cycle just to shut them back down again on your next cycle.