Lao Tzu
New member
competetion to see what will result in banning is occuring. since i woke up suicidally depressed today i am in my 'don't give a fuck' mindset.
first off, to all you people who think you give a shit about the people who died in the WTC attacks, you couldn't care less. want me to show you how?
in the 60's there was a psycholgist named stanley milgram who found that by using mild social pressure he could get peopel to torture another person to death, even as that person screamed in agony. he also found that if you replaced the victim (the one recieving the shocks) with the experimentor (the one running the show) the second the experimentor said 'i don't like this' people ran in to help him. when the victim started screaming, people just ignored him.
when asked why they helped the experimentor, peopel said 'because i am a great guy who cares about people'. little did they know that in identical experiments people didn't lift a finger but rather continued to torture when the victim had no authority.
what this means is that you only care when someone who has 'authority' is in trouble. everyone else can go to hell. it is the nature of the beast, and it sucks. but it is true.
i recently saw on 'the o'reilly factor' a woman who managed to blow $10k from the red cross in 2 months. she said she couldn't pay her mortgage cause her husband died in the attacks. ok, but i have a suggestion. MOVE TO A SMALLER HOUSE.
everyone here is bitching cause $300 a month goes to pay some AMERICAN ghetto kid's college education then turning around and complaining cause a woman can't get by on $4k a month & her regular salary.
my point is that no one really cares about the PEOPLE in the WTC attacks, and they sure as fuck don't care about AMERICANS either. same as in milgram's experiment. obeying authority is passed off as humitarianism.
'if i don't like it, leave'
m'kay. shall i break down that psychology tactic too?
first off, to all you people who think you give a shit about the people who died in the WTC attacks, you couldn't care less. want me to show you how?
in the 60's there was a psycholgist named stanley milgram who found that by using mild social pressure he could get peopel to torture another person to death, even as that person screamed in agony. he also found that if you replaced the victim (the one recieving the shocks) with the experimentor (the one running the show) the second the experimentor said 'i don't like this' people ran in to help him. when the victim started screaming, people just ignored him.
when asked why they helped the experimentor, peopel said 'because i am a great guy who cares about people'. little did they know that in identical experiments people didn't lift a finger but rather continued to torture when the victim had no authority.
what this means is that you only care when someone who has 'authority' is in trouble. everyone else can go to hell. it is the nature of the beast, and it sucks. but it is true.
i recently saw on 'the o'reilly factor' a woman who managed to blow $10k from the red cross in 2 months. she said she couldn't pay her mortgage cause her husband died in the attacks. ok, but i have a suggestion. MOVE TO A SMALLER HOUSE.
everyone here is bitching cause $300 a month goes to pay some AMERICAN ghetto kid's college education then turning around and complaining cause a woman can't get by on $4k a month & her regular salary.
my point is that no one really cares about the PEOPLE in the WTC attacks, and they sure as fuck don't care about AMERICANS either. same as in milgram's experiment. obeying authority is passed off as humitarianism.
'if i don't like it, leave'
m'kay. shall i break down that psychology tactic too?

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










