I know this has been mentioned, but it bears repeating.
He's aware that he's posted about the greatness of Primo before. Don't care for it? Then ignore the fucking thread. Vote with your posts, or the lack thereof. Tired of seeing Nelson's posts? Well I'm tired of seeing inane flamefests.
...
It comes down to protein synthesis. How much protein your muscles can utilize is what will determine how much muscle you grow. Of course, testosterone will increase protein synthesis too, but it will also increase weight, aggression, strength and libido, which makes it seem oh so more powerful than Primo.
Seems pretty true to me.
Butat the end of the line , 1000mgs of Primo will pt on more muscle than 1000mgs of T, and it'll do it with less suppression.
I don't know if a gram of Primo will put on more muscle than a gram of test, but I've never used those amounts of either. I think a more realistic comparison would be between 500mg of each, but then that's just nitpicking. I think 500mg of test will put on more muscle than 500mg of primo. How much of that is actually kept really depends on a variety of factors. Some people will keep most of those test gains; others will lose much of them while maintaining gains they get from primo. If you refuse to accept the FACT that people will respond differently then you have no place acting as any sort of authority on this board.
...
Enter Primo -- specifcally designed to be as low in androgens as possible. Primo does essentially one thing. It uses protein to repair -- which is exactly what you want. But how many times have you heard; "Aw, Primo's weak as shit." You know why people say that? Two reasons: One; They don't take in enough protein. Without protein the steroid has nothing to do. You must saturate your bloodstream with aminos. And two: They don't train hard enough. Without sufficient muscle breakdown the drug also has nothing to do. It must recognize trauma and seek to repair it. The result? More muscle.
Seems pretty well reasoned and logical to me. Consuming more protein on primo will help maximize gains. Pretty fundamental tenet of diet while using steroids in general. Intense training is also widely accepted as necessary for maximizing gains.
But of course, testosterone will give the illusion much more dramatically leading people to believe it's stronger. It isn't. It is harsher though. And cheaper, therefore attractive.
Testosterone's sides do in fact make it look stronger. Partly because it is in fact stronger. Those sides aren't for nothing. It's androgenic effects and anabolic effects are strong. And as a stronger androgen it is also harsher. So Nelson's point gets a little muddy here when he says test isn't stronger than primo. Strength of an androgen consists of many more factors than just muscular hypertrophy.
I'd have to say that only tren and maybe d-bol beats Primo in the pure muscle growth department, but 1000 mgs of d-bol a week is out of the question and considering tren's side effects, it too isn't the wisest choice.
Yes, both D-bol and tren are very effective in stimulating muscle growth. Yes, both are harsher than primo.
No sides. Can't convert to estrogen. Doesn't bloat. Isn't as hard on hair as people think. Harly suppressive. And builds quality muscle. Primo's the shit. I'm surprised more companies haven't made their own version.
Primo does have sides. All roids do. But it definitely has minimal sides when compared to other steroids.