Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Why do people like Eq??

The Terminator said:
OK, so you nitpicked me good :D (I like that :D)
SPECIFICS are key ;)

On MYSELF EQ DOESNT make massive body cpmpostion changes (even with drastic dietary changes) but then again I DONT cycle with the intent of making big body changes anymore (those days are OVER WITH for me)

But I have seen FIRSHAND guys who used Fina and get ALOT more than they expected (as far as overall body sculpting and changing goes), it was counterproductive in some instances
(wrestlers putting ON WEIGHT AND MUSCLE with 500-800 calorie A DAY DIETS :eek2: ), while EQ will NOT make those kinds of changes to ones body...

For strictly an ADVANCED ATHLETE EQ probably wont make major changes, while Tren can :) (even with a VERY RESTRICTED diet and training regimen)

Well said...lol. I didn't mean to come off hard, just trying to reassure the people that use Eq about how it works best. I think now people can understand better who SHOULD and SHOULDN'T use EQ for the reasons stated in this thread. Most of the people on this board aren't top athletes so, just had to clear that up.
 
The Terminator said:
For a REAL NOVICE in the steroid world ANY drug can (and probably WILL make some major changes)
But for an advanced athlete, EQ WONT make those changes...
If it DOES, then one WASNT an advanced athlete, imo :o
for a person who has not reached there genetic limit. what do you feel the best dose of eq is for puttin on mass. i guess i am asking will 600 a week give much greater gains than 400 a week, will the hunger be more intense on 600 as well. i have found that eating is the only bulker for me, so i can take whatever gear i want and bulk up. running the eq with 250 test e when my 12 weeks off are up.
 
bruce410 said:
for a person who has not reached there genetic limit. what do you feel the best dose of eq is for puttin on mass. i guess i am asking will 600 a week give much greater gains than 400 a week, will the hunger be more intense on 600 as well. i have found that eating is the only bulker for me, so i can take whatever gear i want and bulk up. running the eq with 250 test e when my 12 weeks off are up.


For someone looking for alot of size EQ is NOT the best choice...
But 600 mg/week will give some nice solid LEAN TISSUE gains (for me it does anyway :D)

But I wouldnt expect too much from either 400 or 600 a week...
If you gain 15+ lbs off that dosage then you SHOULDNT have been using steroids IMO :o
(I dont think ANYONE should be gaining that kind of weight on ONE cycle, and certainly not with a 'milder' drug like EQ...:o)
 
The Terminator said:
For someone looking for alot of size EQ is NOT the best choice...
But 600 mg/week will give some nice solid LEAN TISSUE gains (for me it does anyway :D)

But I wouldnt expect too much from either 400 or 600 a week...
If you gain 15+ lbs off that dosage then you SHOULDNT have been using steroids IMO :o
(I dont think ANYONE should be gaining that kind of weight on ONE cycle, and certainly not with a 'milder' drug like EQ...:o)
i am surprised u feel that way. i have only done deca and heard eq was superior so i wanted to try. yes i am very patient with my gains, but the only way i gain is by eating 4500-5000 cals. if eq can allow me to do that i think 15 isn't out of the question. i am also adding some tbol at the begining and maybe tren at the end.
 
The Terminator said:
it was counterproductive in some instances
(wrestlers putting ON WEIGHT AND MUSCLE with 500-800 calorie A DAY DIETS :eek2: ), while EQ will NOT make those kinds of changes to ones body...
For strictly an ADVANCED ATHLETE EQ probably wont make major changes, while Tren can :) (even with a VERY RESTRICTED diet and training regimen)

I would imagine it was VERY counterproductive for a wrestler, or any athlete that needs stamina, to be taking tren. That shit throws your cardio/stamina right out the fucking door.
 
Gains vs sides for me. Tren vs EQ. EQ wins.
EQ - No hair loss, no water, didn't touch my BP, OK gains.
Tren - Hair loss, bloated me, spiked my BP badly, couldn't sleep, appetite was crap, but the gains were the fucking sickest I ever saw.
 
You said it
Many people knew it because its widely and cheaply available all over the thirld world - as veterinary versions-
Its a beginner thing, deca is better, and afterwards test.
 
PatBateman3 said:
I hear you guys. For me, after trying fina I'll never bother with Eq again. For those of you who like it so much, are you doing Eq alone so that you know the gains/effects you are liking are coming from the Eq itself?
so why do u like fina so much compared to eq ? fina has alot more sides for sure .
 
Top Bottom