Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Why are there so many criminals in the NFL,NBA ,and not NHL?

When Sia Amma speaks about her circumcision, sitting in her Ellis street apartment, her words describe the joyful sound of African drumming and singing, but her ebony face caressed by the soft afternoon light exhibits the painful childhood memory of an unanesthetized surgery.

Amma was subjected to Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) at the age of 9 in an African village at the border between Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone. “I didn’t know what was going to be taken from me,” Amma calmly explained. Not until she came to the United States to study at City College 14 years ago, did Amma realize what the surgical act had been about.

FGM is practiced on an estimated 6,000 girls and women daily worldwide, and consists in the excision of the clitoris — often without any anesthetics or sterile instruments. Like male circumcision, it is a controversial and sensitive issue, particularly when it comes to the pain caused by the absence of analgesia.

For Amma, now 35, the dichotomy of suffering and celebration is a redundant issue in female circumcision. “It’s very contradicting: every man wants to know he is doing a good job pleasuring a woman,” when actually in many cultures clitoris excision is meant to decrease female sexual drive and pleasure.

Amma herself fought family pressure to save her own daughter, now 19 years old, from being circumcised back in her village in Africa. But the social pressure is such that even her daughter “felt alienated” because all her friends were circumcised.

In fact, the cultural reasons behind FGM are numerous and vary for each country. From mystical beliefs due to a lack of health education, to the sociological necessity of “fitting in” and finding a husband, this practice has numerous roots, as well as many health consequences.

Amma explains that circumcised women are afraid of consulting doctors here in the United States by fear of their reaction — shock. She even receives anonymous e-mails asking for referrals to doctors who would help heal circumcision-related illnesses, such as infections, or would simply be familiar with the procedure to talk.

Although she educates people about FGM, Amma doesn't like to elaborate on the trauma associated with the act itself. “I try not to condemn. I go with compassion and an open mind,” Amma said.

Instead, Amma has decided to perpetuate the African traditional celebration of femininity she remembers — without the clitorectomy — by designating the first day of spring, March 20, “International Clitoris Day,” a date at which women from all nationalities may get together to talk about their sexuality. “I figured, why not have the clitoris blossom in spring?” she said laughing.

For the past two years, on that day, Amma has performed in Berkeley then in San Francisco the educational comedy “In Search of My Clitoris,” which she wrote. “People are afraid of women’s sexuality, so I think that if we can talk about it and if we can celebrate it, then it no longer has the power to scare us.”

Interacting with her audience during the show, Amma realized that the lack of mother-daughter discussion about sexual issues was not just an African problem. This led her to ask the question: what did your mother say to you?

“And a lot of people, their mother said nothing!” exclaimed Amma in her light and charming African accent.

Or worse than nothing. As Amma recalls, a German mother once told her daughter: “Don’t stick your hand down there, you could really hurt yourself: the thing down there has teeth, it’s going to cut you!”

Amma acknowledges that her own dialogue with her mother about sexuality was very poor. “I don’t want to hear about my mother’s sex life,” she said. “But I want at least to have a sense of her sexuality, so that I don’t have to feel so ashamed and guilty.”

The product of her discussions with women from all cultures is a new show, “What Mama said about down there,” currently playing at the Buriel Clay Theater in the African American Art and Cultural Complex.

Amma said that the mothers in her community back in Africa are very pro-active in perpetuating the rite, by fear of their daughter being ineligible for marriage. “So it has to stop with the mothers” Amma explained, adding, “That’s why for me, whether it’s here, whether it’s in Africa, it’s important that mothers and daughters start talking.”
 
redsamurai said:
so because "humans will be humans" and do fucked up shit to each other..........it was ok to pluck people off their land and forcibly bring them over here to do our labor? Save these savages from themselves by making them become our slaves? I've heard people justify slavery due to the fact that it was black selling black to the slavetraders............is this really how you think?
hey dipshit the other african tribes did the "plucking" as you call it
blacks caught blacks and sold them to the whites as slaves

let me do some research for ya
 
The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade

A brief review of the triangular trade



Related Resources
• Slavery and the Slave Trade
• Slavery Images
• The Role of Islam in African Slavery
• Reparations for Slavery?





For two hundred years, 1440-1640, Portugal had a monopoly on the export of slaves from Africa. It is notable that they were also the last European country to abolish the institution - although, like France, it still continued to work former slaves as contract labourers, which they called libertos or engagés à temps. It is estimated that during the 4 1/2 centuries of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, Portugal was responsible for transporting over 4.5 million Africans (roughly 40% of the total). During the eighteenth century however, when the slave trade accounted for the transport of a staggering 6 million Africans, Britain was the worst transgressor - responsible for almost 2.5 million. (A fact often forgotten by those who regularly cite Britain's prime role in the abolition of the slave trade.)

The triangular trade

Expanding European empires in the New World lacked one major resource -- a work force. In most cases the indigenous peoples had proved unreliable (most of them were dying from diseases brought over from Europe), and Europeans were unsuited to the climate and suffered under tropical diseases. Africans, on the other hand, were excellent workers: they often had experience of agriculture and keeping cattle, they were used to a tropical climate, resistant to tropical diseases, and they could be "worked very hard" on plantations or in mines.





Africans had been traded as slaves for centuries -- reaching Europe via the Islamic-run, trans-Saharan, trade routes. Slaves obtained from the Muslim dominated North African coast however proved to be too well educated to be trusted and had a tendency to rebellion.

Between 1450 and the end of the nineteenth century, slaves were obtained from along the west coast of Africa with the full and active co-operation of African kings and merchants. (There were occasional military campaigns organised by Europeans to capture slaves, especially by the Portuguese in what is now Angola, but this accounts for only a small percentage of the total.) In return, the African kings and merchants received various trade goods including beads, cowrie shells (used as money), textiles, brandy, horses, and perhaps most importantly, guns. The guns were used to help expand empires and obtain more slaves, until they were finally used against the European colonisers. The export of trade goods from Europe to Africa forms the first side of the triangular trade.

Trans-Atlantic exports by region
1650-1900
Region Number of slaves
accounted for %

Senegambia 479,900 4.7
Upper Guinea 411,200 4.0
Windward Coast 183,200 1.8
Gold Coast 1,035,600 10.1
Blight of Benin 2,016,200 19.7
Blight of Biafra 1,463,700 14.3
West Central 4,179,500 40.8
South East 470,900 4.6

Total 10,240,200 100.0

Data derived from tables 1.1, 3.2, 3.4, 4.1 and 7.4
as presented in:
Transformations in Slavery
by Paul E. Lovejoy
Cambridge University Press, 2000,
ISBN 0-521-78430-1


The transport of slaves from Africa to the Americas forms the middle passage of the triangular trade. Several distinct regions can be identified along the west African coast, these are distinguished by the particular European countries who visited the slave ports, the peoples who were enslaved, and the dominant African society(s) who provided the slaves.

So, for example, Senegambia includes the Wolof, Mandinka, Sereer and Fula; Upper Gambia has the Temne, Mende, and Kissi; the Wndward Coast has the Vai, De, Bassa, and Grebo. (A forthcoming article will look in more detail at the people and kingdoms involved in the slave trade.)

Slaves were introduced to new diseases and suffered from malnutrition long before they reached the new world. It is suggested that the majority of deaths on the voyage across the Atlantic - the middle passage - occurred during the first couple of weeks and were a result of malnutrition and disease encountered during the forced marches and subsequent interment at slave camps on the coast.

Conditions on the slave ships were terrible, but the estimated death rate of around 13% is lower than the mortality rate for seamen, officers and passengers on the same voyages.


http://africanhistory.about.com/library/weekly/aa080601a.htm
 
Spartacus said:
hey dipshit the other african tribes did the "plucking" as you call it
blacks caught blacks and sold them to the whites as slaves

let me do some research for ya


I know full well that blacks sold blacks........there was a free market demand for slaves so obviously the stronger tribes raped and pillaged villages of the weaker and then sold them as slaves..............got it...................what I'm asking you is "does this justify slavery"???
 
"Amma has decided to perpetuate the African traditional celebration of femininity she remembers — without the clitorectomy — by designating the first day of spring, March 20, “International Clitoris Day,”
 
Spartacus said:
What is female circumcision?
Female circumcision, also called female genital mutilation, involves removing part of a female’s external genitalia (reproductive organs). It is a cultural practice that began about 2,000 years ago in Africa. Female circumcision continues to be practiced by some tribal African cultures, as well as by some Middle Eastern and Indonesian cultures.

Why is female circumcision done?
In many cases, female circumcision is done as an initiation into womanhood. While the age at which the procedure is done varies with the culture, it generally is performed before the girl reaches puberty. Among the reasons for the procedure are to ensure that a female is a virgin when she gets married and to reduce the female’s ability to experience sexual pleasure, which decreases the chance of extra-marital affairs. Some cultures also believe the clitoris (the small mass of highly sensitive tissue located near the opening of the vagina) is dangerous and must be removed for health reasons.

In many cultures that perform female circumcisions, the procedure is done in conjunction with a rite or ceremony. The procedure often is done by tribal leaders, midwives, or older women in the village, most of whom have no formal training or surgical skill. In many cases, the procedure is done with crude instruments, such as non-sterile knives or scissors, and without any anesthetic.

Funny story I heard where I work. Before I started there there were a couple of straight up Africans. What I was told is that someone went to go to the bathroom one day, opened the door, and there was one of them, washing his dick in the sink. wtf. Must be tradition or something. Not in this country.
 
redsamurai said:
I know full well that blacks sold blacks........there was a free market demand for slaves so obviously the stronger tribes raped and pillaged villages of the weaker and then sold them as slaves..............got it...................what I'm asking you is "does this justify slavery"???
slavery exists today right here in america

one could make a good argument that vick is a slave
 
so why is say michael vick QB,NFL a slave
and say joe montana QB,NFL wasn't?

because michael vick is an idiot
and so is the fucksticks in atlanta's front office for drafting him and paying millions

if I was an NFL GM I'd pay to have any potential high draft pick,particularily negroes, "investigated"

and by investigated I mean sending in a PI to watch him and do an in the field background check
or just have "some guys" on staff that i could send to any college USA to smoke dope and blend in with the atheletes to find out if their heads on straight
 
hanselthecaretaker said:
Funny story I heard where I work. Before I started there there were a couple of straight up Africans. What I was told is that someone went to go to the bathroom one day, opened the door, and there was one of them, washing his dick in the sink. wtf. Must be tradition or something. Not in this country.
prolly no soap left either
 
Top Bottom