blaster220 said:
Perfect answer. PERIOD.
Not so perfect, bro. While plenty of people have experienced negative side effects from a.a.s., that alone will not make a substance a scheduled drug. If that were the case, then alcohol would be off the shelves. How many people will die from alcohol abuse this year? Get killed in drunk driving crashes? How many people will cigs kill? How many people will die b/c of health complications brought on by obesity? You think whisky, Marlboro, or the whopper is on a controlled substance list? Nope. Though alcohol, tobacco, and fast food are messing more people up everyday than a.a.s. use could hope to do in a century. Whisky or Winstrol, which one do you think will yield greater political capital by outlawing? Outlawing a.a.s. was feel good stuff to the voting public. But, how do you think the voting public would have felt about losing Jack Daniels? The voting public would have been pissed! Jack will damn sure kill more people in a day than winny will in a hundred years. But the voting public wants their Jack, so he stays and winny goes. This ain't a democracy, it's a hypocrisy! That's where were at.