W
Warik
Guest
nordstrom said:Aren't you the man who sped in a school zone, where slow speeds are necessary to ensure that drivers can stop on a dime? what if a kid had run out in front of your car, and you were speeding. would you have had time to stop?
1) No. I am the man who was driving his vehicle at the posted speed limit outside of the school zone who was stopped by a police officer in a speed trap who claimed that I was in the school zone when in fact I was not, which will be proven on March the 25th in a court of law.
2) Yes, I would have had time to stop.
2.1) I was stopped at 1:46pm - 14 minutes before dismissal. There were no children within 100 feet in any direction.
2.2) My vehicle is able to reduce its speed from 30mph (my approximate speed) to a dead 0 in less than 4 seconds.
2.3) Given the fact that visibility was perfect that day, and that I had my eyes on the road, I would have had more than enough time to stop in the event that a child ran out in front of my car, despite the fact that it was 14 minutes before dismissal, I was on the other side of the median, and contrary to popular belief, children are not that stupid.
3) IF somehow I was in fact speeding inside of the school zone, which I was not, AND it was during dismissal, which it was not, AND a child did run out in front of my car, which one did not, AND I did hit and kill/seriously permanently injure the child, which I did not, I would not object to ANY form of punishment.
Unlike most, I am capable of accepting the logical consequences for my incorrect actions.
Try again.
-Warik