Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

what's your IQ?

I think the point is that we all know that women can't be smart.

also note that the emode test is just a way for them to make money from people wanting to get more shit related to it. if it was a real one and a bunch of people fucked up on it, they would get discouraged and perhaps even laugh and walk away. but if they all show promising scores, then they feel as special as they know that they really are in their head, so then they are more inclined to buy more shit that shows them to be special.

the test isn't a real one, it wasn't timed, and doesn't scale correctly.

also this morning I thought about one more that I know was wrong. so I know that I missed one for sure, and then two others I couldn't narrow down to one answer.

penis.

for "fun" I'll post the answers in a few mins after I go through it again. (although like I said, I don't know the answers to 37 and 40, so maybe someone can enlighten me)
 
big4life said:
For those that think that velvett is lying or exaggerating, you have obviously never spoken with her. She is probably the most together person on this board. I promise you she does not need your approval or anyone else's for that matter. She has her faults, just like everyone, but no one will ever accuse her of being a liar.
If she says she scored a 163 then I believe her, and you know what? It doesn't change one damn thing about her. She is still this incredible lady who can make anyone feel like they are special.

Dude, you have to draw the line between being a nice guy and a sappy kiss-ass.

It just gets old reading your "I Love Velvett, She's So Cuddly" posts.
 
bigguns7 said:


Dude, you have to draw the line between being a nice guy and a sappy kiss-ass.

It just gets old reading your "I Love Velvett, She's So Cuddly" posts.


It's called being a friend and being loyal to that friend.
If you don't like it don't read it.

I promise you, I will not change just because you think I am kissing someone's ass.
 
I've already expressed my dislike for this test, but here are the answers I had. So looking at this, for each one, I will call the top selection #1, then increasing as you go down.
Here goes (19 is the one I def missed the first time around - just plain poor reading skills):

1 3 The red at the top gets inverted inside, and the yellow out - also the shape change - the bottom mirrors that
2 2 The others stand on 4 feet and aren't marsupials
3 4 49 ius next because you are looking at a descending set of squares - 12, 11, 10, 8, and next would be 7 (49)
4 5 It is setting up a contradiction, so to say a negative term followed by a negative term wouldn't follow a contradiction - tempting would be the most positive adjective there - although poetically you could argue noxious, but not on here.
5 2 a hand goes into a sporting glove, and a foot goes into a sporting shoe - an ice skate (looks like hockey specific to me, but what do I know)
6 4 upright triangles go to sideways circles, so upright circles will go to sideways triangles
7 1 you are again looking at squares. 400 is the square of 20, 100 the square of 10, 2500 the square of 50 - the others don't have even squares - but 900 does (30)
8 3 a fallacy is a lie or falsehood, so a argument that is fallacious is false
9 2 the letters rearrange to ENGLAND and that is a country
10 4 Rocket (and now I'm humming Astro Jones) - if you look at the first phrase and the second phrase - they both have "Necor" and only share the translated word "Danger" - so that means Danger. Then if you do the same with the first and last phrase, Buldon is Explosion - so in the first phrase, that only leaves "Rocket" left.
11 2 false. Venn diagram time. Wicks and slicks overlap, and snicks and slicks overlap - but the final point is false because wicks and snicks aren't a definite overlap, just a possible overlap.
12 4 can't tell. You know that Ann is taller than Jill and Kelly - but you don't know by how much or the relation of the other two - so you can't infer their relationship from the data given.
13 2 if he is 4, and his sister is 3 times that age, then she is 12. when he is 12, that is 8 years later, and 12 + 8 = 20.
14 1 while this isn't necessarily grounded in reality, it is another Venn diagram.
15 2 5 - basic math. If one girl caught 4 times as much as the other, then you can do x + 4x = 25, then solve for x - which in this case is Jen, and the answer.
16 3 Inept is someone that is worthless at something - so the opposite is Skillful.
17 3 it went 28 miles in 30 mins - if you want miles per hour, then you need to get the time to an hour, and then adjust the distance accordingly to be the rate of speed… so 30*2 = 60, then 28*2 = 56
18 1 true = more Venn diagrams
19 3 99 - if she is 50th best, then she is in the top 50 (but at the end). If she is 50th worst (the worst being last, the 50th being 49 people away from that) then there will be overlap. It can't be 50 students total because then she would be 50th best and 1st worst. it can't be 75 because she would be 50th worst and then there isn't room to be in the same place for both. 99 allows this with the overlap to be 50th either direction. she is at 50 with 49 people that are better than her, and 49 people worse - so she falls at the 50th worst and 50th best.
20 2 Sandy doesn't start out as fast, but wins. Say the distance between x and y is 60 miles. Then Jack took 2 hours to go x to y, and then 6 hours to get back, for a total of 8 hours. Sandy took 3 hours to go x to y, and 3 hours to get back, for a total of 6 hours. she wins.


not sure how that will format - the server seems to be down for now, so I will do the other 20 when I can get back in
 
I got 142 this go - I went slower and didn't have anyone chatting on AIM with me. I changed the grape answer and the 50th worst/best answer


21 4 if you halve the input and the output, then the time can stay the same.
22 4 this one is silly, but it is self referencing, so it has to be "simple" since it says pure and simple, then questions the pure and negates the other (simple in this case).
23 1 you can look at this a few ways - you can either see it as divide each by 4, or you can look at it as 4 raised to some power, decreasing by one at each step (going negative to get fractions)
24 4 800/10 = 80, 80/4 = 20, 20/2 = 10
25 2 these are annoying - but this would show a relative correlation to prove a point, so price and value are the relative ones here
26 4 you are drawing triangles that are 3,4,5 sides (times 2), so the hypotenuse of one is 10, and then add them together and you have 20
27 2 I hate this one because you could argue a few of them. The apple, pear, and grape have seeds (do bananas have them in the biological sense? My banana knowledge is low.) The coconut, bananas, and grapes grow in bunches. In the end though, the coconut is hairy, has a hard shell, and has fruit and "milk" (sugary water) on the inside - to me that isn't that far off from the others, but the hardness of the shell/skin is what I would go for.... although now that I look at it, I might guess grapes because they grow on a vine and the rest grow on trees... I will change my answer to that.
28 1 just because. The english ones are hard to explain beyond meaning fitting the sentence.
29 4 see above
30 2 see above
31 4 water goes in a glass, a letter goes in an envelope
32 2 hand goes into glove, head goes into hat - and I have no clue on the significance of the capital letters there - perhaps I'm missing something.
33 2 a circle has no angles, the rest do (or you could argue it has infinitely many - but then you could say it only has one side, the rest have at least 3)
34 3 devil is lived backwards, so you are looking for 6323 backwards
35 2 the left most dot moves up one position each time. The dot that starts in the top right corner moves on position diagonally (left and down) each move. The middle dots don't move.
36 2 just obvious
37 4 this is one that I couldn't narrow down to one obvious answer, so I don't know. You know that it is either 2 or 4, because it has to have a circle (each horizontal row retains the bottom shape). And you know it will have a cross above it, but both 2 and 4 do... so it comes down to whether you pick the shaded one or not - the rest of the row is shaded, but looking at the other rows, there isn't a clear pattern as to how you shade - so I just guessed 4, taking the 50/50 chance
38 1 you invert the colors and the shapes
39 2 solid box to solid line, dotted box to dotted line
40 2 again, this one I couldn't narrow down to just one. So I guess at number 2 with a 1/4 chance
 
Your IQ score is 127

At the same time, we compared your answers with others who have taken the test, and according to the sorts of questions you got correct, we can tell your Intellectual Type is a Word Warrior.

The first thing we can tell you about that is you are equipped with a verbal arsenal that enables you to understand complex issues and communicate on a particularly high level. But that's just scratching the surface

does this make me a dumb blonde? lol
 
velvett said:
buddy28
epimetheus



I don't take well to being called a liar - so believe me it will be MY pleasure to try and prove it. Could take a while, would mean I would have to speak to father whom I have not spoken to in 4 years, entering a house 3 hours away but let me tell you it will be so worth it.


Velvett.

I never called you a liar. I dont negate the fact you believe you scored a legitmate 163 IQ. However, I doubt the accuracy of the score you recieved.

Y? Statistically speaking, a legitmate 163 IQ score would place you among the 12,500 most intelligent persons in America, living right now, regardless of age, as defined by a quantified assessment of individual intelligence using an commonly accepted IQ test.

Its possible. But consider nearly every single person on the net embellishes their personal appearence, intelligence, cock size, tit size, or personal accomplishments to impress other people. Its human nature.

If you scored a legit 163 IQ. Good for you. I hope you use use your gift to help others. If not, you can join the rest of us 145's.
 
Last edited:
Do you think they should make it a law that if you score under 55 you have to wear a helmet at all times? And not just any helmet, rather one of those hockey helmets without the visor. A white one too with Smurf stickers all over that fucker.
 
Top Bottom