What's diff b/w Fina & Parabolan?

[Nutrient-Nut]

I know that Parabolan is almost impossible to find anymore, but for comparision purposes, what are the differences between Parabolan and Finaplix (Trenbolone Acetate)? I know that they're both Trenbolones but Fina is an acetate form and Para something else, but what I'm wondering is how do they compare to each other in results one would achieve.

Are they basically the same as far as expectations and results one could obtain from either in the gym. If one looks at the Steroid Chart that list out each drugs: Strength Gains, Mass Gains, Side Effects, and Ability To Keep Gains - they stack up pretty evenly except Parabolan seems to rank higher in Retention of Gains.

Any experienced lifters know if this is true of the old Parabolan and did you like it better than Finaplix or are they about the same in your opinion?

 

[Nutrient-Nut]

SOMEBODY HAS TO HAVE SOME INPUT HERE!!!!!!!

 

[Fancyman]

I looked this up in Muscular Development, all it said was that fina and parabolan are the same, because they contain the active ingredient trenbolone, except they have different esters. And Parabolan was manufactured for human use. So the gains are probably the same, as well as the sides, etc.

 

[The Terminator]

Different esters attached, thus fina releases real quick, while parabolan was much longer acting (sort of like test prop vs. test cyp.) same drug with much different release times.

 

[Juicy-R6]

here u go bro...

by Bill Roberts - Parabolan is trenbolone cyclohexylmethylcarbonate. The half-life of a steroid ester is mostly dependent on its ratio of fat solubility to water solubility: the longer chain the ester, the higher this ratio, and the longer the half-life. This particular carbonate could be most closely compared with an enanthate ester; the half-life is probably a little less than week.

An amp (76 mg trenbolone cyclohexylmethylcarbonate) is comparable only to 58 mg of trenbolone acetate. (The acetate is a little more potent, more effective per milligram, because the acetate ester is lighter and therefore a higher percentage of the weight is trenbolone.)

The properties of Parabolan are the same as trenbolone acetate (Finaject) except for longer half life. While Finaject itself is no longer available, in some cases injectable preparations from Finaplix have been made. The substance is the same: trenbolone acetate.

There is no evidence in the literature, nor I think practical evidence, that trenbolone acetate has a "special role" in burning fat. Rather, it is an extraordinarily potent AAS, being about three times as effective per milligram as testosterone esters. For this reason, any property which anabolic steroids have, trenbolone acetate will demonstrate more strongly per milligram.

I have found no indication in the scientific literature of particular kidney toxicity with trenbolone. I know of a number of users, at doses of typically 50 mg/day, who have experienced no problems. There are however anecdotal claims of kidney problems. It seems to me, however, that this is occurring only with athletes stacking an incredible amount of drugs, and how the blame can fairly be laid at trenbolone (actually at Parabolan, not trenbolone acetate) is not clear.

It is also not clear that trenbolone results in any greater degree of increased aggression for a given amount of anabolic effect than testosterone itself does. However, on a per milligram basis, it undoubtedly does. The substance does not cause uncontrollable "roid rage" despite the hype to that effect often seen.


i hope this clarifies you.

 

[Nutrient-Nut]

Nice follow up! Very useful information to distinguish these two very similar drugs yet different.