Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

what is synthol?

taureauchien

New member
i heard about it today and i dont have a clue what it is.
is it a steroid?
injectable?
pill?
fake cream that builds wonder muscle?
complete waste of time and money?
or a really good kick ass product.

if it's shit, dont hurt me to bad for asking. :baby2:
 
source: http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/ronharris8.htm

What Is Synthol?

Synthol is composed of 85% medium-chain triglyceride oils (a fatty acid), 7.5% lidocaine (painkiller), and 7.5 5 benzyl alcohol. The preparation is injected deep into the muscle where it is encapsulated between the fascicles (bundles of muscle fibers) . With repeated injections, a larger volume of oil builds up inside the muscle, expanding its size like a balloon filling up with air. About 30% of what is injected is metabolized by the body. The other 70% remains lodged in the muscle where it breaks down very slowly over three to five years. There seems to be some issue of debate among bodybuilders as to whether or not Synthol actually lasts this long, and some believe it is even longer. Chris Clark, its inventor, is convinced that it somehow leads to permanent muscle growth in the effected areas, though even he is unsure of the mechanisms that would make this possible. Synthol users report amazing pumps while training, though this could be a result of the extra pressure of the accumulated oil.
 
taureauchien said:
so basically its like a boob job (with a type of oil) injected in your ....arms or wherever?

talk about a short cut

It is a short cut, but some pro body builders use it pre-contest in areas that they are lacking - trying to get as perfect physique as possible.
We will see what people that have used it and vets have to say about it.
 
dont know if i have the balls to chance something like that.
but i wonder though, if you injected a smaller amount than those guys. say enough to jump you an inch and then proceeded to workout that size, if that stretch would become real from building on it.

.....or is that as stupid as "if i inject my dick with steroids will it grow too"

this is interesting, but i in no way want to look like that. but I would like an inch...hmmmmm.....nah, i'm a chicken shit
 
reaper99 said:
no its not real growth and i don't think it stays.

I hope it dont stay cuz the guy in pic one and pic four is just retarded looking. number four looks like the stay puffed marshmellow man !! And to actually think that they think they look good ! :rolleyes: :freak:
 
boston789 said:
AAS isnt real growth either. I would never use synthol and not trying to be a dick but neither is AAS guy.


how can you say AAS isn't real muscle growth man? It sure as hell is. AAS itsels is an advantage yes, but the muscle you are growing using AAS is MOST definitely real.....Why would you think AAS doesn't yield "real" growth man? it sure as hell does

Synthol on the other hand is swelling and oil filling up muscles, in the case of AAS the muscle fibers have actually grown and are larger
 
AAS isnt real growth because you are using DRUGS. If you didnt use AAS then you most likely wouldnt be as muscular, big, strong as you would. Makes sense; think about it. Step back and look at the big picture.
 
Synthol is BS..my boy died from it several yrs ago from a blood clot caused by his quest for big arms/delts! This kid was 25 and died an awful death...stay away
 
boston789 said:
AAS isnt real growth because you are using DRUGS. If you didnt use AAS then you most likely wouldnt be as muscular, big, strong as you would. Makes sense; think about it. Step back and look at the big picture.


Bro, its REAL muscle man, just because you enhanced your body's ability to build it by using steroids doesn't mean it isn't "real" muscle...........you take a look at the real picture bro.

you can't compare synthol to AAS by saying they both don't yield "real" muscle. Sure you will acquire more muscle with AAS but this is REAL muscle bro, its not fake because you used excess anabolics or androgens to acquire it.

So are you going to tell me if i do cocaine for years and yeard and get an oversized heart and die of a heart attack it was a "fake" death because it was drug induced??? no you aren't
 
AAS = increased protein synthesis = muscle growth. How the hell can you say AAS use doesnt yield actual muscle growth? What a dumb comment
 
drrman said:
Bro, its REAL muscle man, just because you enhanced your body's ability to build it by using steroids doesn't mean it isn't "real" muscle...........you take a look at the real picture bro.

you can't compare synthol to AAS by saying they both don't yield "real" muscle. Sure you will acquire more muscle with AAS but this is REAL muscle bro, its not fake because you used excess anabolics or androgens to acquire it.

So are you going to tell me if i do cocaine for years and yeard and get an oversized heart and die of a heart attack it was a "fake" death because it was drug induced??? no you aren't

OK..everybody fucken relax. All I fucken meant by it was that it's not completely natural so in my mind its not completely real. I'm not disrespecting anyone or anything; I've been using AAS for 4 or 5 years now. I'm not saying that it's fake....but its definately not completely real.

Vascularity - ease the fuck up on 'the dumb comment'. It's just a difference of opinion...no need to jump down my throat.
 
boston789 said:
And im not comparing synthol to AAS.


well first of all.. yes u did...

second... not real=imaginary

Tell Jay Cutler his muscles are imaginary

Just because you wouldnt experience the growth naturally does not translate even 1% into it being "fake" growth... I mean come on.

That just doesnt make any sense
 
What the fuck are you talking about imaginary? If you're gonna bring it to an extreme level than synthol isnt imaginary either. All I'm saying is that if you didnt use these sort of drugs you wouldnt be as big and muscular as would if you did. What dont you people get about that? Yeah Jay Cutler...ok...if he didnt use AAS he wouldnt be that big. Period.

When you're on test or dbol and you feel like 'the man' all the time. That's a drug-induced feeling...you werent going to get that without the test or dbol. It is real in the sense that it is happening but it is not real in the sense that it is occuring naturally in the body. Questions?
 
boston789 said:
What the fuck are you talking about imaginary? If you're gonna bring it to an extreme level than synthol isnt imaginary either. All I'm saying is that if you didnt use these sort of drugs you wouldnt be as big and muscular as would if you did. What dont you people get about that? Yeah Jay Cutler...ok...if he didnt use AAS he wouldnt be that big. Period.

When you're on test or dbol and you feel like 'the man' all the time. That's a drug-induced feeling...you werent going to get that without the test or dbol. It is real in the sense that it is happening but it is not real in the sense that it is occuring naturally in the body. Questions?

I was quantifying what YOU said...

According to YOUR logic, dont fucking come at me...

Your the one saying muscle gained on AAS is "not real"

The fact is my logic works perfectly... Not real= imaginary.

Synthol= Imaginary muscle (it isnt muscle at all)

AAS= REAL MUSCLE

therefore

AAS DOES NOT EQUAL NOT REAL

and the "feeling" we have on AAS has shit to do with the muscle being "not real"
 
boston789 said:
. All I'm saying is that if you didnt use these sort of drugs you wouldnt be as big and muscular as would if you did.

Further to that, and addressing that point specifically; not being able to be as big naturally as you are on AAS has NOTHING to do with the muscle not being real.

It just isnt something you would be able to produce normally, that doesnt make it fake.

Your logic or presentation is just severly flawed.

The fact that you cant be as big off AAS as you can on (assuming genetic limitation) has nothing to do with how "real" the muscle you attain with AAS is...


normally i wouldnt respond to this kind of post at all, but i just cant stand when someone throws out an opinion that is just completely and utterly untrue.

Like we dont have enough to deal with from people that know nothing about juice, but for "one of our own" so to speak, to hold that kind of view... its disturbing (re: muscle being "fake")
 
get456 said:
Further to that, and addressing that point specifically; not being able to be as big naturally as you are on AAS has NOTHING to do with the muscle not being real.

It just isnt something you would be able to produce normally, that doesnt make it fake.

Your logic or presentation is just severly flawed.

The fact that you cant be as big off AAS as you can on (assuming genetic limitation) has nothing to do with how "real" the muscle you attain with AAS is...


normally i wouldnt respond to this kind of post at all, but i just cant stand when someone throws out an opinion that is just completely and utterly untrue.

Like we dont have enough to deal with from people that know nothing about juice, but for "one of our own" so to speak, to hold that kind of view... its disturbing


looks to me like we are comparing "opinions. Vs. Facts"
 
Listen...I cant really explain it the way I wan to considering I'm at work and shouldnt be on this right now anyways. Regardless, I didnt mean it to come out the way that you guys took it. My point is that it from a high level its not natural. That was my main point. And dont try and give me that 'one of our own is turning against us' trying to make me look like an asshole. Its an opinion, relax guy. Doesnt mean that I'm against it...doesnt mean that I dont like people who use AAS...doesnt mean that I'm talking shit. I use AAS myself and have been on this board long enough to have an opinion.
 
I think it comes down to this......my idea of "not real" means its just that, not real

you are saying "not real" is simply enhanced by steroid use, which I and everyone else disagrees with

I'll agree jay cutler and all of us wouldn't be as large as we are now without steroids, but the muscle we have is REAL muscle....it isn't our regular sized muscles full of silicon or any other fluid to swell it up and make it look larger. the muscle is REAL bro
 
drrman said:
I think it comes down to this......my idea of "not real" means its just that, not real

you are saying "not real" is simply enhanced by steroid use, which I and everyone else disagrees with

I'll agree jay cutler and all of us wouldn't be as large as we are now without steroids, but the muscle we have is REAL muscle....it isn't our regular sized muscles full of silicon or any other fluid to swell it up and make it look larger. the muscle is REAL bro


that's kind of funny because jay used synthol...i dont know if he still does but i know he used it before
 
Yes it all depends on what the definition of "real" is.

In regards to synthol; yes I think its stupid. I'm not against it though. Use it...what the fuck do I care?
 
boston knows the muscle from AAS is real and that you dont actually have any muscle 'growth' from synthol, just the appearance.

what he meant was that neither one (actual growth, or appearance of growth) would happen naturally without aas or synthol. and that this is the only thing they have in common.
 
taureauchien said:
i heard about it today and i dont have a clue what it is.
is it a steroid?
injectable?
pill?
fake cream that builds wonder muscle?
complete waste of time and money?
or a really good kick ass product.

if it's shit, dont hurt me to bad for asking. :baby2:

its a base of multi chain trygligerate oil and sometimes silica that is injected into the muscle to strech out the fascia (the bag like skin around the muscle). the theory is that by streching the fascia of the muscle its able to grow freely without the restriction . it provides no actuall strenth or muscle growth and abuse can leave you looking deformed.
 
MTS said:
that's kind of funny because jay used synthol...i dont know if he still does but i know he used it before

he definitely uses it, there are parts of his body that are soft as hell - no veins. his biceps are a good example
not saying he is retarded for using it, lots of bb'ers use it and if it is used logically then it isnt bad - kind of a "cop out" IMO
 
mikefear said:
boston knows the muscle from AAS is real and that you dont actually have any muscle 'growth' from synthol, just the appearance.

what he meant was that neither one (actual growth, or appearance of growth) would happen naturally without aas or synthol. and that this is the only thing they have in common.


Thank you brother!
 
Shit-thol not my cup of tea.Did you see those 4 pics?I would chose to be a scrawny no workout whimp before I looked like that.
 
by the way if i remember right synthol starts breaking down after seven years or something and chunks of it can enter your blood stream and cause heart attacks strokes, etc... i guess bump to someone with more knowledge and experience on this subject but the pics from the guys who've used it so far look like shit. look at they're arms they don't even look good.
 
get456 said:
well first of all.. yes u did...

second... not real=imaginary

Tell Jay Cutler his muscles are imaginary

Just because you wouldnt experience the growth naturally does not translate even 1% into it being "fake" growth... I mean come on.

That just doesnt make any sense
lol, werd
 
boston789 said:
Listen...I cant really explain it the way I wan to considering I'm at work and shouldnt be on this right now anyways. Regardless, I didnt mean it to come out the way that you guys took it. My point is that it from a high level its not natural. That was my main point. And dont try and give me that 'one of our own is turning against us' trying to make me look like an asshole. Its an opinion, relax guy. Doesnt mean that I'm against it...doesnt mean that I dont like people who use AAS...doesnt mean that I'm talking shit. I use AAS myself and have been on this board long enough to have an opinion.
well I fore one know boston is not bashing on aas.he is just explaneing a thery here,that is all.so lets not be fucken ass holes about it.its just a thought.

I can understand some of the logic he is using.
 
needtogetas said:
well I fore one know boston is not bashing on aas.he is just explaneing a thery here,that is all.so lets not be fucken ass holes about it.its just a thought.

I can understand some of the logic he is using.

where the hell u been?
:evil:
 
boston789 said:
AAS isnt real growth because you are using DRUGS. If you didnt use AAS then you most likely wouldnt be as muscular, big, strong as you would. Makes sense; think about it. Step back and look at the big picture.


I use Cialis sometimes and I get megaboners. Am I to believe that it is not a real megaboner now! Damn that sucks!
 
Top Bottom