Re: We need an I’m a bitter man forum…
jenscats5 said:
I disagree that my answer is not rational. And not a cop out. You are making a generalization about women saying "women dont' feel remorse." I am saying that people in general don't feel remorse & it's just not women. I fail to see how that is irrational.
Your answer is the essence of a "cop out" , I asked you why and you responded "because it is" , it therefore betrays no rationalism since there is no "why". I give you examples some of which are even on this board - you give me nothing in response. Thanks.
jenscats5 said:
I assume that it's also "irrational" to have a civil conversation on this board/site when simply responding to a post. I certainly don't expect the type of behavior from you that I'm now seeing in response to my posts & others.
Sorry , where was I uncivil to you ? I have already commented to BBF that I shouldnt have belittled him and gave my reason as to why. And you can cut out that mother tone (I certainly don't expect the type of behavior from you)with me lady , that shit might work on some 5 year old kid you can bully around.
jenscats5 said:
Possibly if you act like that in person is why you were so mistreated by this particular female. Otherwise, if that is not the reason, then I can only assume she is an ass & just likes to fuck with people for her own devious purposes.
"Act" ??? What "acts" are you speaking of ? You
volunteered your help - in post #18 . I notice you also make mention that "BTW -- I'm considered arrogant & unapproachable which = confident & right most of the time!" - well I can see how you came to that conclusion
logically.
You want more evidence of my "behaviour" since you now offer justification (why you were so mistreated) , interesting word there "mistreated" , nice contradiction. I remember being punched so hard my sternum was a yellow
bruise , I had numerous black eyes and had a knife thrown at me - books and other study materials destroyed , I remember holding her wrists on a table so that she wouldn't hit in me in the face again , with her thrashing so violently in a drunken rage that her forearms were bruised which she paraded endlessly to any woman (or indeed man) who would listen. Women complain so much of battered wives and the evil men perpetrate on them and yet regard the opposite situation as an impossibility . Way to go ostriches.
The point was women around her rallied to her. - Take a look at my post again please:
Mandinka2 said:
We do not need to rehash the entire case - it's simple - why does society as a whole view (extreme) violence perpetrated by a woman on a man as being entirely acceptable and justifiable (she got off) and yet not the other way around? And more importantly why do supposedly intelligent women who demand "responsibility" and "parity" with men continue to support such causes ? As you make the point , watching the Lifestyle channel is like watching men-hating - why is that allowed ? WOuld it be allowed for men ? Would Sex and the City for example be allowed for men - imagine 4 guys sitting around a table talking about how tight or loose their women were , with the lead female character called "Ms. Tight" ? The show is a perfect example of how modern women collude together against men. I wish to understand why , for if I know why then I can start with "how to change this (and/or turn it to my advantage)?".
It would seem from your repsonse that you are not interested in ANY information that does not back up your particular view - which de facto leads to bias. Unless you never watch television (already established) , live in a conveant and barely walk outside you could have attempted some of my questions - but you didn't . Way to run away from a discussion.
jenscats5 said:
Fine -- I DON'T KNOW!! I apologize for attempting to converse with you on the subject..........
I seriously doubt this , I think the truth is either you don't care or you are happy with the status quo....... the whole thing with the female and male member who cheated on this board is a perfect example of how men are punished severely and rightly for indiscretions but woe betide the man/woman who scrutinises women under the same "harsh" light. It's about "equality".... a word used extensively by women to get exactly what they wanted when it suited them during the latter half of the twentieth century.