tommy39
New member
Well you cant say which is better unless you have a Particular UG and a
particular name brand. One batch of a UG labs test for instance may kick a#@ and be wonderful. The next batch may suck. UGs dont have a strickt
protocol to follow. But to say no UG is as good as name brand companys
is wrong. To say you are 99% more likley to get whats on the label of a brand
name is for sure right. Its risky and hit and miss with UGs. Basically a UG could
be anything made by anyone. So I would at least like some feedback on the lab before using.
particular name brand. One batch of a UG labs test for instance may kick a#@ and be wonderful. The next batch may suck. UGs dont have a strickt
protocol to follow. But to say no UG is as good as name brand companys
is wrong. To say you are 99% more likley to get whats on the label of a brand
name is for sure right. Its risky and hit and miss with UGs. Basically a UG could
be anything made by anyone. So I would at least like some feedback on the lab before using.