Mandinka2 said:
I didn't equate being loose with being a whore , but you seem to have made that jump all by yourself.
you didnt equate it, you implied it with this statement.
"I don't know about YOUR sister but MY sister would never dream of doing what you mention above and if she did she'd get a MAJOR dressing down from her friends and family in Ireland (and coincidentally Klueles so would I lest you WANT to believe something else - I lost my virginity at 19 , and endured endless issues with my parents as a result FYI). I DIDNT call anyone a whore lest you forget nor did I back up Matt's comment , however having said that it has been my experience that women and men who have been loose in the past are EXTREMELY likely to be loose in the present , despite what modern feminism would like us to think with regard to rape cases."
now this is my original post,
"so because in your family and culture a women that has sex is "loose" and being "loose" is a whore we should consider that as part of this case? the defense would absolutely love to have you on the jury. someone who try's to use unfounded logic to reach a verdict."
question time again.
1. in your family and culture is it percieved that a women(or male if that makes you happy) who has sex a few times and before mommy and daddys approval is considered "loose"?
2. did you not imply that such said "looseness" is a whore?
3. do you not believe that such said "looseness" should be considered in this case?
these three questions are directly related to my above post. nothing more, nothing less.
i will answer for you but in your own words.
1. "I don't know about YOUR sister but MY sister would never dream of doing what you mention above and if she did she'd get a MAJOR dressing down from her friends and family in Ireland".
2. "I DIDNT call anyone a whore lest you forget nor did I back up Matt's comment , however having said that it has been my experience that women and men who have been loose in the past are EXTREMELY likely to be loose in the present".
3. "But my post concerning "looseness" was directed at SoKlueles , not at the rape question (although it is definitely relevant to that question)".
again, i think you read too much into my original post. the statements i made in that post certainly look to be true by your own admissions.
so to sum it up here, you believe this women is "loose" based on one question by the defense team and a rumor. that is an assumption on your part.
your society "dresses" people down for such said "loosness" regardless of gender.
you believe that her supposed "looseness" should be considered as evidence in this case.