Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

U.S. plans to develop new nuclear weapons

CFZB

______
Platinum
U.S. plans to develop new nuclear weapons

Washington (Reuters) Wednesday 6th April, 2005 (UPI)

The head of the U.S. nuclear weapons program this week asked Congress to approve funds to research a new nuclear warhead, the Washington Post reported.

Linton Brooks, head of the National Nuclear Safety Administration, said such a warhead could be deployed in fewer than 10 years without any nuclear testing.

There is a ban on nuclear testing to determine whether warheads remain reliable and effective. Most of that work is done through extensive computer modeling.

Brooks said most nuclear warheads in the U.S. stockpile have larger yields than are now needed and they have no ability to attack underground targets.

Today's stockpile may not be the stockpile you want to have 20 years from now, Brooks concluded.

He said newer warheads would be designed to be less sensitive to aging and would be easier to certify as safe and reliable.
 
test boy... relax.. that was intended for the raghead comment guy.
 
mountain muscle said:
Can't we use of our current stockpile first?

Been doing a lot of thinking and finally realized this.

The real money flows from doing business with Uncle Sam when you enjoy White House connections.

The real power boys make their bucks in the arms industry and from the federal incarceration program. Building prisons and feeding etc. The Bush family owns the Florida prisoner feeding program.

Which explains why Bush feels that all prisoners are guilty? In spite of DNA evidence?
 
I really don't like nukes, but I'd rather have new ones sitting around doing nothing than old ones. Especially since I'm in America's armpit and I'm sure there are some stashed somewhere near me.
 
jnevin said:
And what would be keeping your country safe in case of god knows what? Your awe inspiring military? ;)

We keep our country safe by not being a bully and treating everyone with respect. The only nation that is a danger to us is the US.
 
Testosterone boy said:
Been doing a lot of thinking and finally realized this.

The real money flows from doing business with Uncle Sam when you enjoy White House connections.

The real power boys make their bucks in the arms industry and from the federal incarceration program. Building prisons and feeding etc. The Bush family owns the Florida prisoner feeding program.

Which explains why Bush feels that all prisoners are guilty? In spite of DNA evidence?

Governmernt contracts always reap big rewards. But to get the good ones you have to make some govt. personnel happy first. It is called Lobbying when you do it in the open and criminal when you do it in private. That makes sense huh?
Oil and arms are the way to go. Pharmaceuticals are also a nice option.
 
bluepeter said:
We keep our country safe by not being a bully and treating everyone with respect. The only nation that is a danger to us is the US.


Please explain that one.
 
Its not energy .

Its Bombs.

like the kind we would need agains China or Russia.

and maybe now ....Iran

not roadside bombs half way across the planet or al qaeda.LMFAO at all the dorks saying nuke them ragheads.
 
Last edited:
bluepeter said:
Two reasons. Guilt by association and Canada has a shitload of what the US desperately needs. Natural resources, water, oil, lumber etc.


I meant factual explanation. Once Bushtard is gone, how will we remain a threat? I'm not busting balls, I'm interested.
 
jnevin said:
I meant factual explanation. Once Bushtard is gone, how will we remain a threat? I'm not busting balls, I'm interested.

Same reasons. Bush exacerbates each one but both still exist when he's gone. Perhaps the potential danger is reduced slightly but that's small comfort. Plus, with the American swing toward the right who says anyone much better will be in the White House in a few years?
 
How would a swing to the left improve things? Isn't that more of a "what's yours is mine" kind of political train of thought by definition?

And PW, lol my ass off at the nuke the ragheads comments as well.
 
jnevin said:
How would a swing to the left improve things? Isn't that more of a "what's yours is mine" kind of political train of thought by definition?

And PW, lol my ass off at the nuke the ragheads comments as well.

More tolerance and diplomacy in general. Look at what's happening right now. We're being punished with enormous tariffs on some of our biggest exports (lumber being one), the border remaining closed to Canadian meat even though there is zero danger etc. etc. Why? Because Canada refuses to bend over when the US asks, examples being Iraq and missile defence. It's ludicrous.
 
bluepeter said:
More tolerance and diplomacy in general. Look at what's happening right now. We're being punished with enormous tariffs on some of our biggest exports (lumber being one), the border remaining closed to Canadian meat even though there is zero danger etc. etc. Why? Because Canada refuses to bend over when the US asks, examples being Iraq and missile defence. It's ludicrous.


So we're going to come in and take your natural resources from you when we clearly could do without them. I don't get that one. And how is Canada being asked to bend over in reference to these issues?
 
bluepeter said:
We keep our country safe by not being a bully and treating everyone with respect. The only nation that is a danger to us is the US.


I did not realize you had this view. I wonder if you'll remember you believed this a few years from now and be embarassed

Tell me, do you believe that during the cold war and WW II this view applied then as well? Was the only danger to Canada during the 80's the US, and during the 40's?
 
bluepeter said:
More tolerance and diplomacy in general. Look at what's happening right now. We're being punished with enormous tariffs on some of our biggest exports (lumber being one), the border remaining closed to Canadian meat even though there is zero danger etc. etc. Why? Because Canada refuses to bend over when the US asks, examples being Iraq and missile defence. It's ludicrous.



No it is a choice. If you are unhelpful to us there are consequences.

>>Canada brags so much about not needing the US so why are you bitching when we close our borders to some of your industries?<<

Shouldn't matter with your anti-US attitude and love affair with idiotic european leftistism
 
bluepeter said:
We keep our country safe by not being a bully and treating everyone with respect. The only nation that is a danger to us is the US.

Get this through your head. Get this through your head you cannuck motherfucker you. You only exist out here because of the US. That's the only reason. Without the US, you personally, every fuckin' country still around, would be taking a piece of your fuckin' cannuck ass! Then where are you gonna go? Your fuckin' warned. Don't you ever go over our head again! You cannuck motherfucker you!

Wouldn't Joe Pesci be a great diplomat?
 
Last edited:
Get this through your head. Get this through your head you cannuck motherfucker you. You only exist out here because of the US. That's the only reason. Without the US, you personally, every fuckin' country still around, would be taking a piece of your fuckin' cannuck ass! Then where are you gonna go? Your fuckin' warned. Don't you ever go over our head again! You cannuck motherfucker you!

lol

I thought n0th1ng was just in hysterics until I read the last line and remembered that scene.

Yeah, Joe Pesci for President!
 
Oh, and by the way, I think we need as much nuclear weapons as we can get in case a big asteroid is found to be on a collision course toward earth.








(I'm kidding)
 
Actually...........the right wing is only a recession away from taking another leave of absense.

With the spiralling cost of energy.....their boat is leaking right now.

I'm not left wing either.

We really, really, really need another party.

Where is Jefferson when he is needed???
 
We need nukes that are able to destroy Earth at least 10 times

Just in case
 
Testosterone boy said:
Actually...........the right wing is only a recession away from taking another leave of absense.

With the spiralling cost of energy.....their boat is leaking right now.

I'm not left wing either.

We really, really, really need another party.

Where is Jefferson when he is needed???
he is in you.

he is in YOU too.

he is in me.

thats why we need to participate.

Tune in ...turn on ....freak out.

:garza:
 
canadianhitman said:
Rudy will be the next President

God help us if thats the case. Nothing like a national tragedy to make everyone forget how shitty of a mayor he was before 9/11
 
CFZB said:
he is in you.

he is in YOU too.

he is in me.

thats why we need to participate.

Tune in ...turn on ....freak out.

:garza:

Actually.......governmental snooping into our private lives has created a decision to quit voting period.
 
Testosterone boy said:
Been doing a lot of thinking and finally realized this.

The real money flows from doing business with Uncle Sam when you enjoy White House connections.

The real power boys make their bucks in the arms industry and from the federal incarceration program. Building prisons and feeding etc. The Bush family owns the Florida prisoner feeding program.
If those are the guys making the "real money", then why do their earning suck so badly and their stock prices sag so much? Example: Lockeed Martin... Their earnings on sales have been 3.6%, 3.3%, and 1.8% for 2004, 2003, and 2002 respectively. If that's making "their big bucks" then screw that.
 
tbuz67 said:
How can you think of partying at uncertain times like this?

And how is George Jefferson going to help?


You're an idiot. Everyone knows Weezie was running shit.
 
bluepeter said:
Glad the US is allowed to have them but nobody else is.


guarantee's world wide safety.

do you think N.korea, palestine or libya should have nukes?
 
Bluepeter only thinks from the perspective of "America sucks, and..." then starts judging...he's acting like a goof IMO...reminds me of a kid who hates his parents because of teen angst and all that...not much sense in it but it's willful and obnoxious
 
mrplunkey said:
If those are the guys making the "real money", then why do their earning suck so badly and their stock prices sag so much? Example: Lockeed Martin... Their earnings on sales have been 3.6%, 3.3%, and 1.8% for 2004, 2003, and 2002 respectively. If that's making "their big bucks" then screw that.
Wasn't referring to them and doubt I will say more.

They are pawns in the game.
 
you called me a fed once when i first joined here because i disagreed with you or something Tboy... hope you don't use similarly silly judgement in other cases ... bet you do though
 
AristotleBC said:
you called me a fed once when i first joined here because i disagreed with you or something Tboy... hope you don't use similarly silly judgement in other cases ... bet you do though
What did you do with pigeon rat?
 
jnevin said:
So we're going to come in and take your natural resources from you when we clearly could do without them. I don't get that one. And how is Canada being asked to bend over in reference to these issues?

You can do without them? Perhaps for now. Enjoying the conversation but I have to go and answer some idiot on this thread, hold on.
 
AristotleBC said:
I did not realize you had this view. I wonder if you'll remember you believed this a few years from now and be embarassed

Tell me, do you believe that during the cold war and WW II this view applied then as well? Was the only danger to Canada during the 80's the US, and during the 40's?

If I'm wrong, I won't be embarrassed, I'll be happy.

As for the rest of that, during the 80's? Not the only threat but a big one. The USSR eventually collapsed which is too complex to discuss here as to all the reasons but I'm not a big fan of nuclear arms races when one of the protagonists is my next door neighbour.

The 40's? lol, you're joking right?
 
AristotleBC said:
No it is a choice. If you are unhelpful to us there are consequences.

So we are unhelpful because we do not believe in attacking other countries? Or because we do not believe in accelerating arms technology? Give me a break. This is exactly what I'm talking about. Canada should be punished for not submitting to US whims. Fuck that maing.

AristotleBC said:
>>Canada brags so much about not needing the US so why are you bitching when we close our borders to some of your industries?<<

Actually I know of very few Canadians that would ever say we don't need the US. Due to reprehensible agreements like NAFTA, our economy is more tied to the US than ever. Hence the bitching :)

That's not really the point though. My point is that it is silly and immature to try and punish a nation that has supported you for more than a century simply because they disagree with a few of your engagements and decide to remain neutral.

AristotleBC said:
Shouldn't matter with your anti-US attitude and love affair with idiotic european leftistism

My attitude is not anti-US, it is pro-Canada which I guess is why you seem to have a problem. God forbid Canadians stand up for themselves. I think I've told you this before but my father is American, I have dual citizenship and some of my family lives there as have I briefly.

I fail to see how any of my statements are anti-US. The US and their current political and ideological environment scares me, that doesn't mean I don't like the US. I fear what will happen if the US continues their policy of beating down nations whose policies they disagree with or find dangerous, that doesn't mean I don't like the US.

I love the US but I don't like some things about them, so what? I love Canada and don't like some things about this country either. Chill out.
 
n0th1ng said:
Get this through your head. Get this through your head you cannuck motherfucker you. You only exist out here because of the US. That's the only reason. Without the US, you personally, every fuckin' country still around, would be taking a piece of your fuckin' cannuck ass! Then where are you gonna go? Your fuckin' warned. Don't you ever go over our head again! You cannuck motherfucker you!

Wouldn't Joe Pesci be a great diplomat?

lmao

Shutup assplunger.
 
Gambino said:
guarantee's world wide safety.

do you think N.korea, palestine or libya should have nukes?

No, I'd prefer nobody had them. Obviously several countries already do so that's a wash. Why do we need to 'upgrade' them? Fuck that.
 
AristotleBC said:
Bluepeter only thinks from the perspective of "America sucks, and..." then starts judging...he's acting like a goof IMO...reminds me of a kid who hates his parents because of teen angst and all that...not much sense in it but it's willful and obnoxious

I'm gonna let that go because I'm in a good mood and I'm assuming you were having PMS issues when you wrote your various nonsensical replies on this thread. Read my other responses.
 
Top Bottom