Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

Try to read the FBI files on Bernard Baruch...

hanselthecaretaker said:
They've gone off the deep end. That's the problem, most of them get too caught up in it and cross the line.

If anything, our government could arguably be indirectly responsible as a result of unjust political practices. Could you imagine the implications if they were discovered to be directly involved? It's almost an unimaginable scenario.
I can see arguments of incompetence and our Middle East policies being relevant. I watched an interview with a former Govt official claiming Sudan offered up Bin Laden to Clinton and their offer being refused. However, the implication of conspiracy theorists is the government was directly/indirectly involved or ignored warning of the attacks to further a political agenda. If that were the case then why not manufacture WMD and plans for their use against the US in Iraq to ensure the war would be supported, that seems much simpler than organizing a conspiracy on the level of 9/11.
 
hanselthecaretaker said:
...While consciously damaging the lives of plenty of others. If he was truly smart he would've found a better way to preserve his life than through swindling.

don't you think that some people can better serve a war effort by not going?
like henry ford for example
or the farmer who got a farm deferment
would bill gates better serve a war effort by being in the infantry, or staying home and running his multi-billion dollar company?
not fair but how it is
 
Gambino said:
don't you think that some people can better serve a war effort by not going?
like henry ford for example
or the farmer who got a farm deferment
would bill gates better serve a war effort by being in the infantry, or staying home and running his multi-billion dollar company?
not fair but how it is


Of course but that has nothing to do with J.P. Morgan selling defective rifles to the people who are going to war. If that's the type of person he is then perhaps he would have been better of joining them.
 
Top Bottom