javaguru
Banned
I can see arguments of incompetence and our Middle East policies being relevant. I watched an interview with a former Govt official claiming Sudan offered up Bin Laden to Clinton and their offer being refused. However, the implication of conspiracy theorists is the government was directly/indirectly involved or ignored warning of the attacks to further a political agenda. If that were the case then why not manufacture WMD and plans for their use against the US in Iraq to ensure the war would be supported, that seems much simpler than organizing a conspiracy on the level of 9/11.hanselthecaretaker said:They've gone off the deep end. That's the problem, most of them get too caught up in it and cross the line.
If anything, our government could arguably be indirectly responsible as a result of unjust political practices. Could you imagine the implications if they were discovered to be directly involved? It's almost an unimaginable scenario.