D
DUSTY
Guest
Prepare for news of troopers from both sides bein' sent home in bodybags. It will be a terrible outcome.
The Nature Boy said:so people die during war? no way.
chesty said:We all die, it is not when, but how you die. Better to die fighting for your country than by a drunk or a suicide bomber, etc.
Originally posted by bikinimom
I have to go see a paper about some monkeys now.![]()
bikinimom said:Silly... it is an illustration that I am working on.![]()
chesty said:I am sure he is a good friend of Bin Laden as well.
got big? said:I agree with Chesty, id rather come home in a body bag from war knowing i died for what i thought was a just cause... than end up like the thousands in the WTC who died just because they went to work that day.
Code said:
Civilians die in wars too. We try not to target them, but hey, shit happens.
chesty said:And how is it demonstratable that bin laden dispises Hussein?
How many options are there to ones own death? It is inevitable that we all die. When we do not know, how we do not know, but we can to some degree control the why.
chesty said:And how is it demonstratable that bin laden dispises Hussein?
How many options are there to ones own death? It is inevitable that we all die. When we do not know, how we do not know, but we can to some degree control the why.
musclebrains said:
You actually think the world will see America as something more than a terrorist itself if it attacks a nation's populaton unprovoked and then, throwing up its hands over the bodies of thousands of corpses, says "Oh well, shit happens!" ?
And then what?
Code said:
This has happened in every other war, only mediating circumstances were different.
The US is a global bully. I'd rather it be the county *I* live in rather than a country that hated mine, like France.
musclebrains said:
The circumstance of civilian casualties of this likely magnitude has usually been preceded by an actual act of aggression. This is a quantum leap forward from Grenada...and even of the CIA support of bloody coups, in that we will be doing the killing ourselves, in a war in which there's been no actual act of aggression.
That's something we keep missing. Though Iraq, like Israel, has not honored its UN agreements completely, the truth is Saddam has not made trouble outside his borders in 10 years. One has to conclude that world pressure has contained him to a significant degree.
musclebrains said:
Apparently it is a shock to Americans, who still think the Gulf War was bloodless, thanks to "liberal" CNN's coverage of it as a kind of video game starring Colin Powell. In a recent poll, a majority of Americans said they'd disfavor Bush's invasion if it resulted in significant civilian deaths in Iraq -- as if it could be otherwise.
I am unclear how attacking Iraq, deposing its hateful dictator, will affect Al Qaeda's suicide missions or keep drunk drivers off the road. I guess the carnage will provide a nice catharsis, though.
muscle_geek said:
Once again you're wrong. It appears like you listen to news and friends and such to gather opinions. I've been part of the fighting. The only terrorists that have any resolve whatsoever are the leaders. The actual terrorist that lead the missions are just stupid, misled people. They are extremely scared of us. When we attack they run and hide. They will only re-form and plot against us when attacks stop.
This war will last less than two weeks. Everyone is making this out to be something bigger than it is. The people of Iraq want us to overthrow Sadaam. They are just powerless to defeat him and they are scared to speak out against him. Yes, many of them will die. But they will dance in the streets when they become liberated. I promise you that. I've been very close to these type situations in the past.
The Nature Boy said:
the actual war is the easy part. Then what? do we just leave? do we setup some puppet regime that the people will eventually hate and overthrow, only to have someone worse than saddam running the show?
my problem is that nobody has discussed what to do after the war, and how long we have to stay there.
Code said:
After the war, no one cares. If we get wrapped up in sending billions in aid money we waste money. If we prop up our own puppet regime, it's just going to ite us in the ass when that leader turns against us.
The Nature Boy said:
the actual war is the easy part. Then what? do we just leave? do we setup some puppet regime that the people will eventually hate and overthrow, only to have someone worse than saddam running the show?
my problem is that nobody has discussed what to do after the war, and how long we have to stay there.
The Nature Boy said:
you're right, but that's not good. that means we might end up going back, for a 3rd time. yey.
naturally anabolic said:human beings i am starting to believe are nothing but hateful, grudge bearing, evil beings. [/B]
chesty said:And how is it demonstratable that bin laden dispises Hussein?
bikinimom said:Loosen up people....
Life is too short. I hate all of this war talk. Maybe I am simple, but I just don't like it...
I have to go see a paper about some monkeys now.![]()
BUMP
![]()
FLASHMAN1 said:
I hate to break it to you bro, but MB is right about that... Bin Laden is a muslim extremist that hates the athiest Bath party that Sadaam leads. The muslim extremists hate all non-muslims, INCLUDING Hussein. That much is well documented... However, that said, what that tape is calling for is for all muslims (Iraqi civilians) to rise up against "American agressors" It said nothing of supporting Sadaam or his government.
Frackal said:Most of these pussies like ariolanine are almost guaranteed to never have seen real war....why dont you go sign up if you're so eager to watch people die
Frackal said:Most of these pussies like ariolanine are almost guaranteed to never have seen real war....why dont you go sign up if you're so eager to watch people die
The Nature Boy said:
the actual war is the easy part. Then what? do we just leave? do we setup some puppet regime that the people will eventually hate and overthrow, only to have someone worse than saddam running the show?
my problem is that nobody has discussed what to do after the war, and how long we have to stay there.
musclebrains said:And then what?
ariolanine said:Who cares what we do after we get hussein? We are trying to kill terrorists, that's it.
The Nature Boy said:
excellent long range thinking!!!! the reason why, is so we don't have to go back FOR A 3RD TIME!!!
DUH!!!!!!! it's a good thing you're not running the show.
ariolanine said:
I already have talked to a recruiter. He said that their would need to be at least 4,000 casualties before I had a chance at any real combat. Since the war won't last long enough and since we will have less than 200 casualties, I have no chance to kill anyone. I guess that makes me a pussy. But I still don't jerk to vin diesel.![]()
naturally anabolic said:cant we all just get along? is that so hard to ask? greed, envy, nationalism, corruption...these are the things we need to "war" against because this world is going to hell in a handbasket and bush, saddam, osama bin laden, dick cheney, colin powell, ariel sharon are leading us all there.... why dont we execute all these fucking bureaucrats, terrorists, tyrannts and just go about being happy we are alive and enjoy life, If people are hungry then feed them, if they are without shelter then give them such....The world is a community as much as it is seperate nations, people fail to remeber that, no power has blinded us to this fact because if we actually all worked together...it might just work out...im not advocating communism because i think it is inherantly flawed but some of its ideals are very good....people are people no matter where they are from....
fuck this world would be a better place if we had never invented firearms or weapons of any sort...
human beings i am starting to believe are nothing but hateful, grudge bearing, evil beings.
atlantabiolab said:
This has to be one of the most stupid, ignorant things I have had the misery of reading on this board.
Code said:
You weren't here for May1010, Adam, STEEL BEAST or Luvs2lift.
musclebrains said:
Apparently it is a shock to Americans, who still think the Gulf War was bloodless, thanks to "liberal" CNN's coverage of it as a kind of video game starring Colin Powell. In a recent poll, a majority of Americans said they'd disfavor Bush's invasion if it resulted in significant civilian deaths in Iraq -- as if it could be otherwise.
atlantabiolab said:
Can we say "loaded" question? How does one define "significant civilian deaths"?
How bout we take a poll and ask "Do you support the war in Iraq, if bad things will happen?"
Actually, last I heard, the whole UN is behind us (political support wise) save Germany, France, and Russia. All three of which have been helping Saddam over the last several years.DUSTY said:WHO'S HELPING US FIGHT THIS WAR BESIDES GREAT BRITIAN?
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










