Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
think about this
- Thread starter thelocal
- Start date
DodgeChallenger
New member
no idea !
Ox-Sandra-Loan
New member
Because it's not esterified, and thus would have the same or very similar half-life to the oral dbol, and would need to be injected very often, ideally 3x/day. It would avoid first pass metabolism, and therefore any given dose might be slightly more effective, but the whole purpose of 17α-alkylation is to eliminate first pass losses, so I think this effect would be minimal. It would however still ultimately be metabolized by the liver, so it would still have the same negative effects on the liver.
Plus it would use up valuable syringe space that could better be used with some test.
Plus it would use up valuable syringe space that could better be used with some test.
thelocal
Banned
man im not saying you dont know you stuff but i disagree wiht you on that one just becasue of old bodybulding pros and vets that i know that used ineluctable d-boll and had great results and injected eod..and it wouldn't be AS hard on the liver as an oral would be..i am totally against orals cuz i want to keep my liver
therugger
New member
Probably readin steroid profiles somewhere on the web. The way I understand it when EQ was first made they expected it to be a long acting dbol type inject, but turned out to get much different results.
But that is something I read on a steroid profile years ago when I was researchin my first cycle.
Ezekiel
New member
Doesn't negate the fact that D-bol has a very short half-life. Therefore, eod injects would NOT provide a consistant amount of the steroid in your system.
Not saying it doesn't work.. I am saying however that stable levels of test in your blood are going to yeild better results.
That being said; I do know some fellows that take 30 /mg 2 /hrs before there workouts and have had good results.
