There's No Such Thing As "Bridging."

[Nelson Montana]

You're either on or off.

"Bridging" is a theory started by a certain Meso guru whose rambings have been proven wrong on many occasions yet somehow, "bridging" was survived.

No wonder.

People like to hear what they want to hear. If you think that continuing to use gear with no supression or side effects and no loss of gains -- GREAT! But it doesn't work that way.

You can no easier recover through bridging than you can stop a leak in a boat by putting another hole in it to let the water out.

Deal with it.

 

[boston789]

I never believed in bridging either.

 

[monopoly19]

You're either on or off.

"Bridging" is a theory started by a certain Meso guru whose rambings have been proven wrong on many occasions yet somehow, "bridging" was survived.

No wonder.

People like to hear what they want to hear. If you think that continuing to use gear with no supression or side effects and no loss of gains -- GREAT! But it doesn't work that way.

You can no easier recover through bridging than you can stop a leak in a boat by putting another hole in it to let the water out.

Deal with it.

AM Dbol? I have never tried it, but some of the info makes logical sense to me.

Monopoly

 

[LAN T]

You're either on or off.

"Bridging" is a theory started by a certain Meso guru whose rambings have been proven wrong on many occasions yet somehow, "bridging" was survived.

No wonder.

People like to hear what they want to hear. If you think that continuing to use gear with no supression or side effects and no loss of gains -- GREAT! But it doesn't work that way.

You can no easier recover through bridging than you can stop a leak in a boat by putting another hole in it to let the water out.

Deal with it.

Don't know, don't care. Not too many "experts", and I use the term very loosely, agree on anything in this field.

 

[Nelson Montana]

AM Dbol? I have never tried it, but some of the info makes logical sense to me.

Monopoly

Specious thinking. It sounds good -- but it doesn't work.

The concept is that since d-bol is only active for about 20 hours, it'll be out of the system while you sleep, therfore you'll be "recovering." Even if that's so, taking it again the next morning will just put you back to square one. There will be no recovery.

There isn't a single documented case of anyone restoring their HPTA in this manner. Not that there needs to be a study to prove wheater a theory is sound, but this is one that seems pretty easy to validate. It won't happen because it can't.

This shouldn;t be confused with the mistaken notion that any amount of gear will shut you down. Dosage matters. But trying to move forward by taking steps backward is not the way to go.

 

[slat1]

You are either on or off. There is no inbetween!

 

[Anthony Roberts]

Don't know, don't care. Not too many "experts", and I use the term very loosely, agree on anything in this field.

Experts agree on 85-90% of the same things. Focus on that and not the 15-10% they don't agree on, and you'll be better off.

 

[Nelson Montana]

Don't know, don't care. Not too many "experts", and I use the term very loosely, agree on anything in this field.

True but those who really know what they're talking about tend to agree on many things if not everything. Two doctors may have differing opinions but they'll both agree where the appendix is.

But the problem with steroids is twofold.

One: Those who know the most aren't really interested in bodybuildng applications. You won't hear about "bridging" in a medical reference book. You need people with experience that is outside the normal applications.

Two: People who post on the internet, yet have never been regonized in any way (published, acknowledged by authorities, etc) have been able to establish themselves as experts simply through recognition. It's like somebody being famous for being famous. You don't need any special talent or ability -- people just have to know who you are.

 

[solidspine]

I thought the whole bridging concept was developed by Dan Duchaine?

 

[Anthony Roberts]

True but those who really know what they're talking about tend to agree on many things if not everything. Two doctors may have differing opinions but they'll both agree where the appendix is.

But the problem with steroids is twofold.

One: Those who know the most aren't really interested in bodybuildng applications. You won't hear about "bridging" in a medical reference book. You need people with experience that is outside the normal applications.

Two: People who post on the internet, yet have never been regonized in any way (published, acknowledged by authorities, etc) have been able to establish themselves as experts simply through recognition. It's like somebody being famous for being famous. You don't need any special talent or ability -- people just have to know who you are.

I totally agree. Here's my additions:

1. The issue with people who are experts on steroids also hinges on the fact that if you really are a top guy in the world for steroid knowledge, you work with athletes in something called the "NFL" not the "NPC"...The second raters are working exclusively with bodybuilders for training, diet, steroids, etc....the top dudes work where the top money is.

2. And if they were experts, they surely could put together a couple hundred pages and get it published!