Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

The New M.o.d Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter dballer
  • Start date Start date
D

dballer

Guest
M.O.D was banned for going into the mod board.. but he was supposed to be doing it as a favor to catch a scammer.... he was banned... but then we was allowed to come back.


Boach and smalls... well all of you know the story........


can I at least get a HI5INFERNO on the double standard here??? I just want that to be clear.. that is why I wanted to bump that M.O.D thread.... but now it is gone.. cause it was too old. I think that thread was from right around the time smalls was looking at the mod board too... but that is not old enough.
 
Im still waiting for a explanation on this double standard dballer pointed out.
 
The double standard is that M.O.D. accessed the mod board through a mod's account to find a scammer and messed with polls and threads. He even told winny fan who had voted for him to be banned, so he was banned.

Then, because his motivation was deemed noble, he was unbanned.

Doesn't anyone else see a double standard?
 
dballer said:
M.O.D was banned for going into the mod board.. but he was supposed to be doing it as a favor to catch a scammer.... he was banned... but then we was allowed to come back.


Boach and smalls... well all of you know the story........


can I at least get a HI5INFERNO on the double standard here??? I just want that to be clear.. that is why I wanted to bump that M.O.D thread.... but now it is gone.. cause it was too old. I think that thread was from right around the time smalls was looking at the mod board too... but that is not old enough.


Happened before my time as a mod so I have no knowledge of why in particular he was banned.

WHat was/is his new board name?
 
Re: Re: The New M.o.d Thread

Cornholio said:



Happened before my time as a mod so I have no knowledge of why in particular he was banned.

WHat was/is his new board name?

M.O.D!!! he was given back full rights... I am serious!!
 
sk* said:


Exactly!!! Gonna continue talking mr. dumbass corn? :rolleyes:

It was stated in the deleted thread that he was psoting under a different screen name
 
run a search on MOD... he is still here. He is a good dude.. I like him actually. He posts on the anabolic board.
 
I'd like to know why Wodin felt the need to search for the twin thread M.O.D. had posted on the anabolic board in October and delete that one too.
 
Like i said - happened b-4 my time - no idea why he is back.....
 
68GT350 said:
I'd like to know why Wodin felt the need to search for the twin thread M.O.D. had posted on the anabolic board in October and delete that one too.

both were deleted???
 
You started the bulshit call out - I was not wrong in my reply..there were two threads...you mentioned that I or wodin had deleted it out of self interest, i had not.....simple.

I do apologize for making you look like the idiot you are on that flame though....
 
sk* said:


There is NOT ONE indication of me accusing you of deleting that thread



Originally posted by dballer
just wondering is the person who deleted it could find it in their heart to tell the peasants why it was taken from us?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Probably cause it proved a point against mr wodin and cornholio and whoever else banned smalls.


Dballer was asking about who deleted it- you replied probably cornholio


proof enough


waste of time..I'm done.
 
There seems to be too many questions about parity - I'l post on the mod board about this...if he IS back then it is very disturbing....
 
Man steals medicine for his ailing wife VS. Man steals money to support his life of crime. Do both men deserve the exact same punishment for the crime of stealing or not? This is what it comes down to.

Do the people with the powers of authority around here have enough sense to look at the facts and issue a justifiable punishment based on individual circumstances or not??? As was the case of re-instating M.O.D. because his intent was not to cause harm but rather to protect others.
 
polarpixie said:
Man steals medicine for his ailing wife VS. Man steals money to support his life of crime. Do both men deserve the exact same punishment for the crime of stealing or not? This is what it comes down to.

Do the people with the powers of authority around here have enough sense to look at the facts and issue a justifiable punishment based on individual circumstances or not??? As was the case of re-instating M.O.D. because his intent was not to cause harm but rather to protect others.

Boach was only trying to protect smalls picture from being posted.. and I was proving to all of the good members of this site that there is some SEVERE shit being talked about them on the mod board!!
 
dballer said:


Boach was only trying to protect smalls picture from being posted.. and I was proving to all of the good members of this site that there is some SEVERE shit being talked about them on the mod board!!

I'm glad someone see's it from my P.O.V.

Thank you, Dballer.
 
dballer said:


Boach was only trying to protect smalls picture from being posted.. and I was proving to all of the good members of this site that there is some SEVERE shit being talked about them on the mod board!!

Once again....ding ding ding....BINGO!!! Are people not capable of looking at the intent and not the actions themselves? Isn't the purpose of banning users to weed out haters who are AGAINST us and not FOR us?

Intent of M.O.D.: Protect the users
Status: Banned then Re-instated

Intent of Boach: Protect A user
Status: Banned

Intent of DBaller: Protect the users/ Expose the lies
Status: May be banned????

It appears that the above 3 folks were breaking the rules FOR us and not AGAINST us. Not that it excuses what they did but the right punishment is not to keep them from being a part of this message board.
 
polarpixie said:


Once again....ding ding ding....BINGO!!! Are people not capable of looking at the intent and not the actions themselves? Isn't the purpose of banning users to weed out haters who are AGAINST us and not FOR us?


Wouldn't you say that both the intent and the actions need to be weighed? Actions are more important, because they point to an inability to stay within a pre-defined framework. (In small words: there are methods in place to deal with things. Use them )



Intent of M.O.D.: Protect the users
Status: Banned then Re-instated

Intent of Boach: Protect A user
Status: Banned

Intent of DBaller: Protect the users/ Expose the lies
Status: May be banned????


Smalls sending the picture out resulted in a lot of bullshit getting circulated. That was really silly judgment on her part and one has to wonder if the community benefits with people like that around.

Boach's intentions may have been good, but he did not think through his actions very well. Sometimes you have to know when there is nothing you can do. Despite all those intentions, he arrived at an illogical conclusion and did something unwise. even with his good intentions, the picture is all over the Internet. Last I heard it is on Kazaa. Intentions have failed.



It appears that the above 3 folks were breaking the rules FOR us and not AGAINST us. Not that it excuses what they did but the right punishment is not to keep them from being a part of this message board.


That's a lot of drama. But cut through it and realize that focusing on intentions is the same as punishing people for thought crimes.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:


Wouldn't you say that both the intent and the actions need to be weighed? Actions are more important, because they point to an inability to stay within a pre-defined framework. (In small words: there are methods in place to deal with things. Use them )





Smalls sending the picture out resulted in a lot of bullshit getting circulated. That was really silly judgment on her part and one has to wonder if the community benefits with people like that around.

Boach's intentions may have been good, but he did not think through his actions very well. Sometimes you have to know when there is nothing you can do. Despite all those intentions, he arrived at an illogical conclusion and did something unwise. even with his good intentions, the picture is all over the Internet. Last I heard it is on Kazaa. Intentions have failed.





That's a lot of drama. But cut through it and realize that focusing on intentions is the same as punishing people for thought crimes.

GOOD POST....

can you explain the double standard???
 
Well, I'll try.

From what I understand, MOD was banned, but requested through an admin that he be re-instated.

Any banned member certainly has the right to petition an admin (or george) for reinstatement, although the admins / GS are certainly not obligated to respond.

I don't know if Boach or SMA took this course of action. If they have not, then saying "double standard" is not really valid. If theyhave, and the request was denide, then that is a decision that was made by the admins given the nature of the offenses.

I don't think there is a double standard. I think MOD pleaded his case, the admins or GS or whomever re-instated him looked at his contributions on teh Anabolic Board, and concluded he could stay.


As for my opinion, what SMA did was worthy of banning. Sending out a naked pic of yourself on the Internet demonstrates an egregious absence of a thought process. Depsite everyone saying she is a "nice person" or "good person" etc., that kind of behavior is totally devoid of common sense and a liability for a chat board.

Boach should have left it alone. Once the pic was out, there was nothing that could be done.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:


As for my opinion, what SMA did was worthy of banning. Sending out a naked pic of yourself on the Internet demonstrates an egregious absence of a thought process. Depsite everyone saying she is a "nice person" or "good person" etc., that kind of behavior is totally devoid of common sense and a liability for a chat board.

Boach should have left it alone. Once the pic was out, there was nothing that could be done.


I have no say-so either way. It seems that unless you are a mod you have no voice at all here.. but along with sending nude pictures.. selling drugs over the net demonstrates an egregious absence of a thought process. Posting on this board allday instead of working demonstrates an egregious absence of a thought process.
 
dballer said:



I have no say-so either way. It seems that unless you are a mod you have no voice at all here.. but along with sending nude pictures.. selling drugs over the net demonstrates an egregious absence of a thought process. Posting on this board allday instead of working demonstrates an egregious absence of a thought process.



Hey DB.... You're still here ;)
 
MattTheSkywalker said:
Smalls sending the picture out resulted in a lot of bullshit getting circulated. That was really silly judgment on her part and one has to wonder if the community benefits with people like that around.
MattTheSkywalker said:
As for my opinion, what SMA did was worthy of banning. Sending out a naked pic of yourself on the Internet demonstrates an egregious absence of a thought process. Depsite everyone saying she is a "nice person" or "good person" etc., that kind of behavior is totally devoid of common sense and a liability for a chat board.
What she demonstrated was her naiveness and her misplaced trust in people, not an absense of an egregious thought process. "One has to wonder if the community benefits with people like that around."?? You're making that statement based on her actions thus far? and "that kind of behavior is totally devoid of common sense and a liability for a chat board." That kind of behavior?? I bet you were a real partier in high school weren't ya Matt. ;) Take a look around the chat board. Good God, I don't have any desire to know what is on the brains of the people who post on this board and IMO many are devoid of common sense and frequently engage in misbehavior.

Your words sound like something that would come out of the mouth of a high and mighty haughty president of some exclusive snotty little country club in the Hamptons...
 
Last edited:
dballer said:



I have no say-so either way. It seems that unless you are a mod you have no voice at all here.. but along with sending nude pictures.. selling drugs over the net demonstrates an egregious absence of a thought process. Posting on this board allday instead of working demonstrates an egregious absence of a thought process.

You're being silly.

Selling drugs on tehNet is dangerous, and EF is about to get slammed in a major newspaper. But this is not a drug sales forum, it is a place for people to exchange ideas.

Was the work comment directed at me? WTF?
 
MattTheSkywalker said:


You're being silly.

Selling drugs on tehNet is dangerous, and EF is about to get slammed in a major newspaper. But this is not a drug sales forum, it is a place for people to exchange ideas.

Was the work comment directed at me? WTF?

no.. The Project.. asked if I could work and post... sooo

oh yeah.. I guess putting your pic on the net is dangerous.. eitherway.. people do it everyday. Neither you or me are to judge them.. but to make calls of honesty, truth and justice.

do what I say not what I do.. it none of the above.
 
Yeah, I'm the silly one here. Not that that's any surprise.

And for the record, I asked if *I* could work and post. That's all.

honesty, truth, and justice? That sounds awful important just for being a mod...
 
polarpixie said:


:( What she demonstrated was her naiveness and her misplaced trust in people, not an absense of an egregious thought process. "One has to wonder if the community benefits with people like that around."?? You're making that statement based on her actions thus far? and "that kind of behavior is totally devoid of common sense and a liability for a chat board." That kind of behavior?? I bet you were a real partier in high school weren't ya Matt. ;) Take a look around the chat board. Good God, I don't have any desire to know what is on the brains of the people who post on this board and IMO many are devoid of common sense and engage in misbehavior.

Those words sound like something that would come out of the mouth of a high and mighty haughty president of some exclusive snotty little country club in the Hamptons...



Well, you can call it misplaced trust if you want. I call it lack of common sense, and it borders on sheer stupidity. Have you sent out nude pics? Maybe she wants attention. Who knows? Who cares. That was a dumb, dumb things to do.

At the end of the day, her action led to other people trying to do good things, but instead causing problems for the board and wasting the time of the owners and admins, who, if informed, could have addressed the situation sooner.

It is a business and there is a real cost to this board when that kind of shit happens.

why are you taking personal shots at me? I have spoken only of SMA's actions....not her personally. I have no idea what your high school reference means, but I did spend a lot of time in the Hamptons.
 
TheProject said:

honesty, truth, and justice? That sounds awful important just for being a mod...

every single move you make for the rest of your life should be made based on this. I know.. it sounds stupid... but remember when I posted the mod fourm.. and some of the mods were lying. If they were to demonstrate the forementioned qualities.. that would have never happend.

a nickel worth of free advice from DBaller.
 
as a board member i would like to throw my full support behind dballer, GT350, and smalls. if possible i would like to be present at the possible reinstatement hearings to express what i believe to be a great loss if these honorable members are indeed banned for good. it is my belief that through dialogue we can and will come to a satisfactory conclusion for all that will include no bannings at this time. i ask that all the upstanding decent mods please show your support for these members. please notify me through pm's. thank you.

sincerely,
sponge
 
MattTheSkywalker said:
Well, you can call it misplaced trust if you want. I call it lack of common sense, and it borders on sheer stupidity. Have you sent out nude pics? Maybe she wants attention. Who knows? Who cares. That was a dumb, dumb things to do.

At the end of the day, her action led to other people trying to do good things, but instead causing problems for the board and wasting the time of the owners and admins, who, if informed, could have addressed the situation sooner.

It is a business and there is a real cost to this board when that kind of shit happens.

why are you taking personal shots at me? I have spoken only of SMA's actions....not her personally. I have no idea what your high school reference means, but I did spend a lot of time in the Hamptons.

It was misplaced trust as well as a lack of common sense. She obviously was not thinking about the possibility of this picture getting in the wrong hands. She was just being young, naive and having a little fun. As far as whether or not I have ever sent out nude pics, I trusted an ex-boyfriend who I was with for several years with some indecent photos and guess what happened after we broke up? It was nothing of this magnitude where people I didn't even know were looking at the photos. I was younger and had to learn the hard way myself. Don't you think she has already been punished for her bad judgement already?

lol..the high school reference was just my way of pointing out that you are very 'square'. ;)
 
dballer said:


every single move you make for the rest of your life should be made based on this. I know.. it sounds stupid... but remember when I posted the mod fourm.. and some of the mods were lying. If they were to demonstrate the forementioned qualities.. that would have never happend.

a nickel worth of free advice from DBaller.

There's no question in my mind that everyone should act with the utmost integrity.

The fact of the matter is, not everyone likes everyone else, and I'd venture to guess that all of us have bitched about one member or another via pm's, e-mail, chat, or what have you. I don't expect the mods to be any different, and if they want to call me any variety of names, it doesn't matter to me where they do it because it has zero impact on who I am and what I can do.

If everyone were completely honest with one another, the world would be a different place. Not necessarily better, but it sure would be different.
 
Oh Fuck - here we go again..........you got something to say????
 
Top Bottom