Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below Why is it that all the anti-war protest people NEVER seem to place any blame on Iraq? After all it is Iraq that has disobeyed 17 UN resolutions. Iraq is the one that is violating international law. These were NOT United States resolutions but UN resolutions. Last September the UN Security Council voted UNANIMOUSLY to the use of force to disarm Iraq if the terms of the resolution were not met. The terms were Immediate (not a missle or 2 every few weeks) disarmment, and to catalog ALL illegal weapons. (agreed to by the UN). These conditions were not met and would never be met by Saddam. Let's face it he has worked hard to accumulate these BANNED weapons and does not want to give them up. The United States is just about the only power to be that has the capability and will to do these ugly tasks. If we did not feel that these insane terrorists would use these weapons AGAIN to attack US then maybe we could let France and Germany deal with this. However we do not put the security of our country in the hands of other countries with their own agendas ahead of ours. What country is it that everyone on this planet runs to to escape any type of atrocity? Who do they run to when help or money is needed for just about any trouble they run into? Which countries borders are crossed illegally thousands of times per year by people looking for a better life? What other country sets up all these illegals with food , money and a place to live even though they contribute nothing to it? EASY answer, the terrible old US of A. The terrorists of the world are going to learn the hard way not to fuck with us!
The French Connection
- Thread starter Spidey
- Start date
Sigmund Roid
New member
We SHELL not EXXONerate Saddam Hussein for his actions. We will MOBILize to meet this threat to vital interests in the Persian GULF until an AMOCOble solution is reached. Our best strategy is to BPrepared. Failing that we ARCOming to kick your ass.
F
Frackal
Guest
Otis you make some good points, but what was the exact wording of 1441 with regards to:
Timeframe
and
Consequences if not met
Timeframe
and
Consequences if not met
NorCalBdyBldr
New member
Ok, I couldn't bite my tongue any longer.........LOL.......a couple of comments on a couple of comments on the "Berkeley theory" as put forth by Riker20, Otis2 et al. and also something that Spidey and I totally agree on!!!
Spidey said: “Incidently, I don't see what the big deal is about off-topic posts. If you don't want to "waste your time" reading off-topic stuff, just don't open and read obviously off-topic threads. Problem solved.”
I have to agree entirely with that statement. If Riker29 or anyone else doesn’t like the thread, just don’t open and read it. The fact that those that oppose keep coming back for more and continue to complain says something about them. I am just not sure what exactly what that is though…….LOL
Mikes20 said: “wow berkley boys are testy , i thought you were all the hippie mellow type but i guess i understand too i would be edgy too if i was on his little tofu vegan diet fucking hairy girls, but to each his own, i'd much rather stay here with my orange county sunny skies, warm weather and beaches, blonde big fakie girls than the "all natural" of berkley and who's majority of the population is an embarassment to our state and country, have fun saving whales, trees, owls, whatever you people do”
Frackal said: “What makes you think he is from berkley?”
Otis2 said: “didn't he say he was from there? well no, someone else did, oh well, i was just runnin with the whole theme”
Be it known!!!
It was Riker29 and Otis2 that put forth the sinister but ammusing “Berkeley theory.” The fact that you just parroted what they said and accepted it as fact is what conservatives and others do with things like “liberal media”—it has been said SO many times that it just MUST be true but no one ever really questions why it is a “fact”—you beautifully proved my point. I threw out the concept of a “conservative media” to jerk some chains, stir some shit up and see if anyone might actually use their brain, but guess what? Parroting is the order of the day. Pretty predictable really though. At least Frackal realized the obvious and probably even read my earlier reponse to Riker29’s "Berkeley theory" where I said “None of your assumptions are even close to the truth in your statement!” I thought that was fairly clear and did not need explaining but apparently not. And I guess that of anyone on this board, I would know if I live in Berkeley or not or fit the funny sterotype theory being put forth as it unfurled. So here it is, I do not live in Berkeley. I have never lived in Berkeley. From this, a thinking person would realize that I also did not go to school at Cal/Berkeley either and THAT person would be correct. Actually I went to a pretty conservative Ivy League school back east for my undergraduate work and a rather conservative Southern University for graduate work. However, I do admit that I was recently IN Berkeley to watch the pro bodybuilding show down there “Battle for the Bay” where Jay Cutler won the show. The Berkeley theory was so off the mark, that it is laughable (I have to admit that I was getting quite a bit of amusement out of it) as I don’t even live in the San Francisco Bay Area, or any county that even abutts any Bay Area County, or Silicon Valley for that matter. In other words, I don’t live anywhere even close to there. It is a pretty long drive for me.
Continuing on, I do not eat TOFU. I do not even like TOFU. In fact it can easily be stated that I strongly DISLIKE TOFU—I mean, honestly, why would I want to ingest something that has a tendency to increase female hormones anyway? I am into bodybuilding not building fat. I am not a vegan, have never been a vegan and thoroughly enjoy my bloody slabs of RED meat and other carcass derived "food products."
Moving forward, Inbathed bodies and unshaved pits and hairy, unshaved legs, do not work for me. But it is a free country somewhat and to each their own. Whatever turns your crank and frankly I don’t want to know. That is like WAY too much information.
As for hippie mellow types……..that’s pretty funny. Completely missed the mark on all counts there as well. Let’s see, I am a two time military veteran with two honorable discharges. Have shaved hair on my head and am always clean shaven. I do not fall into either a dove or a hawk category and [rather obviously] am not a conscientious objector to war, but I do consider the individual situation, pros and cons, and come to my own conclusions as to whether what we are doing is the best way to approach a situation. But to each their own again.
Well now, I have started Monday with a good laugh.....
Spidey said: “Incidently, I don't see what the big deal is about off-topic posts. If you don't want to "waste your time" reading off-topic stuff, just don't open and read obviously off-topic threads. Problem solved.”
I have to agree entirely with that statement. If Riker29 or anyone else doesn’t like the thread, just don’t open and read it. The fact that those that oppose keep coming back for more and continue to complain says something about them. I am just not sure what exactly what that is though…….LOL
Mikes20 said: “wow berkley boys are testy , i thought you were all the hippie mellow type but i guess i understand too i would be edgy too if i was on his little tofu vegan diet fucking hairy girls, but to each his own, i'd much rather stay here with my orange county sunny skies, warm weather and beaches, blonde big fakie girls than the "all natural" of berkley and who's majority of the population is an embarassment to our state and country, have fun saving whales, trees, owls, whatever you people do”
Frackal said: “What makes you think he is from berkley?”
Otis2 said: “didn't he say he was from there? well no, someone else did, oh well, i was just runnin with the whole theme”
Be it known!!!
It was Riker29 and Otis2 that put forth the sinister but ammusing “Berkeley theory.” The fact that you just parroted what they said and accepted it as fact is what conservatives and others do with things like “liberal media”—it has been said SO many times that it just MUST be true but no one ever really questions why it is a “fact”—you beautifully proved my point. I threw out the concept of a “conservative media” to jerk some chains, stir some shit up and see if anyone might actually use their brain, but guess what? Parroting is the order of the day. Pretty predictable really though. At least Frackal realized the obvious and probably even read my earlier reponse to Riker29’s "Berkeley theory" where I said “None of your assumptions are even close to the truth in your statement!” I thought that was fairly clear and did not need explaining but apparently not. And I guess that of anyone on this board, I would know if I live in Berkeley or not or fit the funny sterotype theory being put forth as it unfurled. So here it is, I do not live in Berkeley. I have never lived in Berkeley. From this, a thinking person would realize that I also did not go to school at Cal/Berkeley either and THAT person would be correct. Actually I went to a pretty conservative Ivy League school back east for my undergraduate work and a rather conservative Southern University for graduate work. However, I do admit that I was recently IN Berkeley to watch the pro bodybuilding show down there “Battle for the Bay” where Jay Cutler won the show. The Berkeley theory was so off the mark, that it is laughable (I have to admit that I was getting quite a bit of amusement out of it) as I don’t even live in the San Francisco Bay Area, or any county that even abutts any Bay Area County, or Silicon Valley for that matter. In other words, I don’t live anywhere even close to there. It is a pretty long drive for me.
Continuing on, I do not eat TOFU. I do not even like TOFU. In fact it can easily be stated that I strongly DISLIKE TOFU—I mean, honestly, why would I want to ingest something that has a tendency to increase female hormones anyway? I am into bodybuilding not building fat. I am not a vegan, have never been a vegan and thoroughly enjoy my bloody slabs of RED meat and other carcass derived "food products."
Moving forward, Inbathed bodies and unshaved pits and hairy, unshaved legs, do not work for me. But it is a free country somewhat and to each their own. Whatever turns your crank and frankly I don’t want to know. That is like WAY too much information.
As for hippie mellow types……..that’s pretty funny. Completely missed the mark on all counts there as well. Let’s see, I am a two time military veteran with two honorable discharges. Have shaved hair on my head and am always clean shaven. I do not fall into either a dove or a hawk category and [rather obviously] am not a conscientious objector to war, but I do consider the individual situation, pros and cons, and come to my own conclusions as to whether what we are doing is the best way to approach a situation. But to each their own again.
Well now, I have started Monday with a good laugh.....
NorCalBdyBldr
New member
And considering sterotypes, my inlaws live in Tennesee, are hardcrust religious right wing republicans, AND THEY eat tofu AND are VEGANS AND are anti-war.......does that count?
NorCalBdyBldr
New member
"HOW YOU KNOW WHEN YOU'RE A HOPELESS LIBERAL: when you use the word conservative in describing CNN & MSNBC"
How you know you are a hopeless conservative/fascist: when you can't even see the obvious and lack the critical thinking/analysis skills to understand anything other than what you are told/programmed to believe by propaganda.
How you know you are a hopeless conservative/fascist: when you can't even see the obvious and lack the critical thinking/analysis skills to understand anything other than what you are told/programmed to believe by propaganda.
