**The Anabolic BRIDGE: By Ross**

[Ross]

So let me get this, how come in supplement advertising, they use recent studies in supplements to prove / suggest an increase in natural test levels and gaining "14 lbs of bodyweight in 7 days" or whatever it is your products claim. Why do they come up with recent studies all the time. Is it becuase the human body has undergone some sort of a genetic mutation that I wasn't aware of in the past 20 yrs? Darwin will be flippin in his grave...tsk, tsk, tsk at your comments

Fact remains recent studies are credible. Old studies are a thing of the past. Bodybuilding and steroids has evolved immensly over the years.

Look at Arnold when he was Mr. Olympia and look at Jay Cutler now. See the difference?

Provide me with something credible and a recent study, then we have something to argue and discuss. I will NOT accept studies undertaken by the infamous Ross.

LOL, I didn't conduct those studies my friend. They are published in PubMed, they are highly reputable, believe what you want my man.

 

[the_alcatraz]

LOL, I didn't conduct those studies my friend. They are published in PubMed, they are highly reputable, believe what you want my man.

I'm not tryin to bust ur balls or un-credit you or anything like that. I have nothing against you. I'm just saying that why would I look at studies made in 1984...I read that book...people back then were different....steroids weren't as big as they are now.

 

[LiquidPhire]

Ross im still waiting on my free bottle of Andogenerator from months ago, lol.

 

[blackthunder]

Ross im still waiting on my free bottle of Andogenerator from months ago, lol.

watch what you say, you might get sued.

 

[Powerbuilder333]

I've bridged with 10mg Dbol every morning, and 10iu slin post workout (4 x EW), for 10 weeks between cycles.
It worked well for me.

 

[Ross]

Ross im still waiting on my free bottle of Andogenerator from months ago, lol.

What is your order#?

Have I spoken to you before? Have you called our customer service: 1800-777-0901?

Please don't make it seem like our customer service is lacking when you failed to even contact us. We respond to all emails within 24 hours and all orders are shipped within 24 hours.

I'll take care of this right away, just provide your order #.

 

[sensational]

I'm not tryin to bust ur balls or un-credit you or anything like that. I have nothing against you. I'm just saying that why would I look at studies made in 1984...I read that book...people back then were different....steroids weren't as big as they are now.

If the studies were properly performed and the data is good, there is no reason to discredit a study just because it is 20+ years old.

And to say that steroids aren't as big back then as they are now is just false...they didn't have the AI's or as many exotic drugs, but in 84 they weren't a controlled substance in the US...I would bet that usage might have been higher.

Yes, we know more about steroids and pct and other facets of supplementation than we did then, but that doesn't mean that studies are outdated. I myself am a scientist, and to discredit a study just because of its publishing date is...well, unscientific.

I see Ross as an addition to this board. His writing is articulate and motivating, so what if he pushes his products? Wouldn't you if you had a vested interest? Lay off the guy...

 

[the562goodguy]

If the studies were properly performed and the data is good, there is no reason to discredit a study just because it is 20+ years old.

And to say that steroids aren't as big back then as they are now is just false...they didn't have the AI's or as many exotic drugs, but in 84 they weren't a controlled substance in the US...I would bet that usage might have been higher.

Yes, we know more about steroids and pct and other facets of supplementation than we did then, but that doesn't mean that studies are outdated. I myself am a scientist, and to discredit a study just because of its publishing date is...well, unscientific.

I see Ross as an addition to this board. His writing is articulate and motivating, so what if he pushes his products? Wouldn't you if you had a vested interest? Lay off the guy...

+1 minus the scientist part lol

 

[tropo]

If the studies were properly performed and the data is good, there is no reason to discredit a study just because it is 20+ years old.

I totally agree. A properly conducted scientific study/experiment does not lose any credibility over time. Facts are facts.

What should scientists do then? Redo all experiments over 10 years old?

Sure, advances are made over time, but they are usually based on older relevant studies/experiments.

For example, most of Einstein's theories are as relevant today as they were a century ago, and most modern physics is based on them.

 

[eddymerckx]

I totally agree. A properly conducted scientific study/experiment does not lose any credibility over time. Facts are facts.

What should scientists do then? Redo all experiments over 10 years old?

Sure, advances are made over time, but they are usually based on older relevant studies/experiments.

For example, most of Einstein's theories are as relevant today as they were a century ago, and most modern physics is based on them.

yea, but this gravity thing is just a fad...








oh, wait, i just looked at myself in the mirror...maybe not a fad

still, scientific studies must be viewed in light of other factor--as in who funded it etc and abstracts are not studies---what are the qualifcations, limitations, adverse events etc......sorry, no access to pub med--nor would i understand it anyway.