Test in Teenagers!

[instant.muscle]

most people always say when ur between 16 and 21 ur test is through the roof, so say a 30 year old man took a cycle of test 250 mg a week and a 17 year old took the same thing? would the teenager get better results? how much more test will he actually have than the older person?

 

[instant.muscle]

in other words, is a teenager taking test at 250 mg like him actually taking 500 mg, twice the ammount of a 30 year old man?

 

[juicedbeachbum]

well not really. the difference between a 17 year old and a 30 year old is probably only about 21mgs of test a week.

A teenager will also suffer much great consequences from using steroids at a young age. It messes up pueberty due to a sudden elevation in test and then a decrease and can cause permanent damage.

 

[idcbp]

I'm no doc, but at first glance I bet the teenager see far poorer results. Since he already had a high test. production the exogeneous source would be less noticable and his body would already be behaving as if on cycle due to the natural production. The 30 yr old would lack the natural test levels and would react more noticably. The teenager would be at his heightened test. level for years so a revised scenario would be comparing giving 250mg of test to a guy who has been natural and to a guy who has been on 250mg of test for 3-4 years. In this case, receptor down grade and affinity would render the first guy, our 30 yr old, the more effective candidate. I think that would be the case, but I'd love to hear from anyone else.

 

[dugie65]

With the right PCT the side effects should not be that different from those of an adult. With test back in production after cycle functioning at a normal level, i dont see why there would be. As for the question, i would probably think that the teenager would gain more than the adult. Unless you want to take into account the training habits and diet of both parties. IDCBP, i dont know about you, but i havn't seen any teens out there gaining enormous amounts of weight and strength gains as if they were on cycle all the time. If that were true teens would have no use for AAS because their body would already behave and grow like it was on cycle. I agree on the receptor site affinity scenerio, that is the main reason why as you grow on the # of cycles you have taken, you also have to increase dosages to get the same gains.

 

[SaleenMustang91]

well i am 18 and have been training for about 4 years...without aas..but i do a lot of research and read the board daily to learn more about aas...but i have been training for the past year vigorously and a good diet and il tell you we do not grow like we are on a cycle thats for sure

 

[Ajax45]

Damnit, and I was all set to use the Superman fly around the world/reverse time method and go back to when I was 18 for say 8-12wks and do nothing but workout, eat and sleep. Oh and maybe look up a few of my old girlfriends.

 

[pharmadan]

There is alot more to it chemically than test levels. Teenagers have higher GH levels, sensitive receptors, etc. A teen test-30's test comparison is not logical.