Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
spongebob
New member
let me pre-empt this with a couple of comments. i say this because i am sincere. this is not a 'poop' thread. and if your discusted by this kind of dialougue i understand and by all means please refrain from participating.
you know i too do not like to discuss this topic, in fact ive been married for over twelve years and rarely discuss anything with her. we dont even fart in front of each other still, you have to keep at least one item sacred IMO. but i have found that if i take a technical approach i am more comfortable talking about this issue.
let me tell you my story first. and throughout this discussion i will use terminology that i think we can all feel comfortable with.
it started last week,with some constipation, which ill refer to as waste stoppage from this point forward. not a big deal right? no. well it ran into the next day. at this point waste movements begins to exporting in a more effecient manner. traditionally, i think it just runs first come first serve basis. in this case there was a problem with what i believe to be the size of the waste itself. if other shipments are ready to go though we need to get this one out of the way for right now. the holding area i would call the hold tank. packages are recieved and shipped.
in the meantime your body being real smart as to occurring problems senses an issue with with an export in waste movements. they know there could be a bottleneck situation if the body continues to send oversized containers to the hold tank. so its ifrst corrective action response is to cut back on the packaging size and most important its density. this will allow this material to 'move' past the 'problem' container in the hold tank. minor adjustments
i think the hold tank works off of two control schemes. the first one and default is the pressure of the hold tank. this allows for venting of off gases. the second one and critical is the level control. having a high and a high high alarm. reduntant alarms.
ive noticed that there are three systems working in tangents here also. you have solids or slurry movements, liquids and ejactulation movements.
ive noticed that when the solids division has outgoing waste the liquids division is on standby and releases as soon as solids closes its valve. or to be more precise, its movements sensing device. in other words you cant have the liquids valve open if the solids moement sensing device is measurring something. it is in sequential order for control purposes.
what i was getting was my liquids valve wouldnt open, thats because i was constantly picking something up on my solids movement side. because there was a package in the hold tank at alll times. so we had to get over-rides for the liquid valve to function properly. just internal paperwork.
another interlock associated with these systems is the one between the liquids and ejactulation divisions. if you have a pressure sensing device picking something up in that div your outlet valve will not open in your ejaculation div. in other words, you can not have two liquids exporting at the same time. im only assumming because of the discharge pressures. if one is higher than the other you may back up one material from one into another. it would probably cause anti- bacterial systems meltdown malfunction.
if you daisy chain the three systems together, i belive you can not have a solids movement sensing device activated and have a ejaculator outlet valve open at the same time. basicaslly electrical interlocks.
i have not resolved my problem fully yet but it is being worked on. i sent in two guys from a tech support group from an external vendor known as ex-lax. from what i gather there are ongoing talks as we speak. they seem to have know how to handle with the packaging problems. internally our guys dont have a emulsions group that break down a package that has alreasdy been packed to ship.
so as of right now everybody is on standby. im hoping as soon as the negotiators resolve some of these issues everything will break loose from that point so to speak.
you know i too do not like to discuss this topic, in fact ive been married for over twelve years and rarely discuss anything with her. we dont even fart in front of each other still, you have to keep at least one item sacred IMO. but i have found that if i take a technical approach i am more comfortable talking about this issue.
let me tell you my story first. and throughout this discussion i will use terminology that i think we can all feel comfortable with.
it started last week,with some constipation, which ill refer to as waste stoppage from this point forward. not a big deal right? no. well it ran into the next day. at this point waste movements begins to exporting in a more effecient manner. traditionally, i think it just runs first come first serve basis. in this case there was a problem with what i believe to be the size of the waste itself. if other shipments are ready to go though we need to get this one out of the way for right now. the holding area i would call the hold tank. packages are recieved and shipped.
in the meantime your body being real smart as to occurring problems senses an issue with with an export in waste movements. they know there could be a bottleneck situation if the body continues to send oversized containers to the hold tank. so its ifrst corrective action response is to cut back on the packaging size and most important its density. this will allow this material to 'move' past the 'problem' container in the hold tank. minor adjustments
i think the hold tank works off of two control schemes. the first one and default is the pressure of the hold tank. this allows for venting of off gases. the second one and critical is the level control. having a high and a high high alarm. reduntant alarms.
ive noticed that there are three systems working in tangents here also. you have solids or slurry movements, liquids and ejactulation movements.
ive noticed that when the solids division has outgoing waste the liquids division is on standby and releases as soon as solids closes its valve. or to be more precise, its movements sensing device. in other words you cant have the liquids valve open if the solids moement sensing device is measurring something. it is in sequential order for control purposes.
what i was getting was my liquids valve wouldnt open, thats because i was constantly picking something up on my solids movement side. because there was a package in the hold tank at alll times. so we had to get over-rides for the liquid valve to function properly. just internal paperwork.
another interlock associated with these systems is the one between the liquids and ejactulation divisions. if you have a pressure sensing device picking something up in that div your outlet valve will not open in your ejaculation div. in other words, you can not have two liquids exporting at the same time. im only assumming because of the discharge pressures. if one is higher than the other you may back up one material from one into another. it would probably cause anti- bacterial systems meltdown malfunction.
if you daisy chain the three systems together, i belive you can not have a solids movement sensing device activated and have a ejaculator outlet valve open at the same time. basicaslly electrical interlocks.
i have not resolved my problem fully yet but it is being worked on. i sent in two guys from a tech support group from an external vendor known as ex-lax. from what i gather there are ongoing talks as we speak. they seem to have know how to handle with the packaging problems. internally our guys dont have a emulsions group that break down a package that has alreasdy been packed to ship.
so as of right now everybody is on standby. im hoping as soon as the negotiators resolve some of these issues everything will break loose from that point so to speak.
Last edited:
