Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below billy17425
New member
just like the question states trying to show my friend something.
He wants to do a cycle of just masteron and anavar for his first
He wants to do a cycle of just masteron and anavar for his first
Should test be in every cycle?
- Thread starter billy17425
- Start date
702daswoll1
New member
Since I have been a member of this board I have adopted this philosophy however Im still not 100% sold on the idea. Im running test with each cycle and think it should always be ran with deca and steroids that give you limp dick but what about a primo only run? Or anavar only run? Seems like it would be a good idea..
holy ghost
New member
See im in the same boat
If your running low doses ive subbed a shitload of proviron
and some other DHT derivs
so you would think yes it has to be, but really its NO.
lets just say for 98% of the typical cycles YES
If your running low doses ive subbed a shitload of proviron
and some other DHT derivs
so you would think yes it has to be, but really its NO.
lets just say for 98% of the typical cycles YES
iceman7230
New member
yes!
Pat_McCrotch
New member
Why is the question?
navigatorrs
New member
I have never run a cycle with out test. I just stick to the basics!!
Yes.
No.
There is no right answer.
I believe the correct - or nearly as close to correct as you can get - is that your first cycle (and every cycle afterwards) should not be based on what compounds to use, but rather what goals you want to achieve.
If a person is lean and needing to bulk with sheer bodyweight, use test or other androgens.
People with high BF% really don't want to do so as they should be building small amounts of muscle while dropping % of BF the entire cycle.
My first cycle was EQ and winstrol. I put on 11 pounds - though it could have been more as the scale reflected a bodyweight change of 11 pounds but I also lost some BF% too. This was lean gains too. No water retention, which was (and still) my goal.
You can do a search and find some of the most unconventional cycles have given the best results. A lot of old timers from 2001 and so used to do EQ + Deca cycles and have great results. I don't see that anymore.
If you looked at the WWE wrestler orders when Signature was busted, you will see the most common stack all of the ones listed were doing consisted of deca, winstrol, adex.
Post stats and goals and we might can hazard a better guess.
No.
There is no right answer.
I believe the correct - or nearly as close to correct as you can get - is that your first cycle (and every cycle afterwards) should not be based on what compounds to use, but rather what goals you want to achieve.
If a person is lean and needing to bulk with sheer bodyweight, use test or other androgens.
People with high BF% really don't want to do so as they should be building small amounts of muscle while dropping % of BF the entire cycle.
My first cycle was EQ and winstrol. I put on 11 pounds - though it could have been more as the scale reflected a bodyweight change of 11 pounds but I also lost some BF% too. This was lean gains too. No water retention, which was (and still) my goal.
You can do a search and find some of the most unconventional cycles have given the best results. A lot of old timers from 2001 and so used to do EQ + Deca cycles and have great results. I don't see that anymore.
If you looked at the WWE wrestler orders when Signature was busted, you will see the most common stack all of the ones listed were doing consisted of deca, winstrol, adex.
Post stats and goals and we might can hazard a better guess.
needtogetaas
New member
good post...aap is all over the aas forum today.AAP said:
