Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Science: We are Borg

blut wump

New member
Nanotech helps blind hamsters see

Nanotechnology has restored the sight of blind rodents, a new study shows. Scientists mimicked the effect of a traumatic brain injury by severing the optical nerve tract in hamsters, causing the animals to lose vision. After injecting the hamsters with a solution containing nanoparticles, the nerves re-grew and sight returned. Writing in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the team hopes this technique could be used in future reconstructive brain surgery.

Ultimate challenge

Repairing nerve damage in the central nervous system after injury is seen as the ultimate challenge for neuroscientists, but so far success in this field has been limited. Nerve regeneration is set back by a number of factors, including scar tissue and gaps in brain tissue caused by the damage. And this can make treatment by medical and surgical methods very difficult.

To find a novel way around these problems, the team based at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), US, and Hong Kong University looked towards nanotechnology - a branch of science involving the manipulation of atoms and molecules. The researchers injected the blind hamsters at the site of their injury with a solution containing synthetically made peptides - miniscule molecules measuring just five nanometres long.

Once inside the hamster's brain, the peptides spontaneously arranged into a scaffold-like criss-cross of nanofibres, which bridged the gap between the severed nerves. The scientists discovered that brain tissue in the hamsters knitted together across the molecular scaffold, while also preventing scar tissue from forming. Importantly, the newly formed brain tissue enabled the brain nerves to re-grow, restoring vision in the injured hamsters.

"We made a cut, put the material in, and then we looked at the brain over different time points," explained Dr Rutledge Ellis-Behnke, a neuroscientist at MIT and lead author on the paper. "The first thing we saw was that the brain had started to heal itself in the first 24 hours. We had never seen that before - so that was very surprising."

Stroke repair

The scientists looked at young hamsters with actively growing nerve cells, and also at adults hamsters whose nerves had stopped growing. Dr Ellis-Behnke said the team was surprised to find that the nerves in the adult hamsters had re-grown after the injection.

"We found that we had got functional return of vision and orientating behaviour, which was very surprising to us because we thought we would have to promote cell growth, through the growth factors." The researchers found the peptides were later broken down by the body into a harmless substance and excreted in the animals' urine three to four week after first injected.

The scientists believe that they have overcome some of the barriers to nerve regeneration, and hope to be able to apply their work to medical applications at a later stage. "We are looking at this as a step process. If this can be used while operating on humans to mitigate damage during neurosurgery, that would be the first step," Dr Ellis-Behnke told the BBC News website. "Eventually what we would look at is trying to reconnect disconnected parts of the brain during stroke and trauma."

Dr Ellis-Behnke said that stroke and traumatic brain injury could have a major impact on an individual. "In order to try to restore quality of life to those individuals you can try to reconnect some disconnected parts to try to give some functionality in the brain for communication and other things like that. And that's where we think that this might be very useful," he added.

_41434368_nano_203b.jpg

Nerve growth (shown in green) occurred after the injections
 
Go Science Fiction....what are the religions to do when we are able to transfer an entire consciousness to a new body? Wait, they will forbid it on the grounds we're "playing God." If we can "play God" doesn't it mean God can't be much better than us?
 
Does this mean hammy will be able to finally see soklu? Actually it's kinda creepy in that kick ass sort of way.
 
Suh-weet. I have heard that one of the criticisms of the flynn effect is that if IQ is really going up we should be living in an age of cultural and scientific revolutions. I don't see how we can't be living in a world like that. Every year new advances in human rights and technology present themselves. Its a great age to be alive.

You have to wonder if/when this kind of technology will be used to increase neuron density in some parts of the brain instead of just rebuilding broken neurons.
 
Lao Tzu said:
Suh-weet. I have heard that one of the criticisms of the flynn effect is that if IQ is really going up we should be living in an age of cultural and scientific revolutions. I don't see how we can't be living in a world like that. Every year new advances in human rights and technology present themselves. Its a great age to be alive.

You have to wonder if/when this kind of technology will be used to increase neuron density in some parts of the brain instead of just rebuilding broken neurons.
It would be banned in the US as "playing god." by the fundamentalists. Why is there such an issue with improving humanity through science?
 
JavaGuru said:
It would be banned in the US as "playing god." by the fundamentalists. Why is there such an issue with improving humanity through science?

I'll just get a plane ticket to South Korea if that happens, get my surgery and come home. Its not a question of who gets to play got, it is a question of either we play god or we leave the nature of existence to chance.

I guess it is human nature to hold some things sacred. The same thing happened during the start of the scientific revolution in the 1700s. And muslim fanatics burned the library of alexandria around the 8th century. I'm sure there are other examples of this happening. Luckily this mass opposition to playing god seems restrained to the US

Go transhumanism
 
Lao Tzu said:
I'll just get a plane ticket to South Korea if that happens, get my surgery and come home. Its not a question of who gets to play got, it is a question of either we play god or we leave the nature of existence to chance.

I guess it is human nature to hold some things sacred. The same thing happened during the start of the scientific revolution in the 1700s. And muslim fanatics burned the library of alexandria around the 8th century. I'm sure there are other examples of this happening. Luckily this mass opposition to playing god seems restrained to the US

Go transhumanism
No doubt...I'll just go to mexico.....
 
Lao Tzu said:
I'll just get a plane ticket to South Korea if that happens, get my surgery and come home. Its not a question of who gets to play got, it is a question of either we play god or we leave the nature of existence to chance.

I guess it is human nature to hold some things sacred. The same thing happened during the start of the scientific revolution in the 1700s. And muslim fanatics burned the library of alexandria around the 8th century. I'm sure there are other examples of this happening. Luckily this mass opposition to playing god seems restrained to the US

Go transhumanism


good to see you back around ;)
 
JavaGuru said:
It would be banned in the US as "playing god." by the fundamentalists. Why is there such an issue with improving humanity through science?

It is no different than lawyers causing the price of prescription drugs to skyrocket because of all the frivolous lawsuits they instigate trying to exploit the system to the fullest... at the expense of everyone else. It isn't the drug companies that lose out on the big settlements, they just raise their prices to cover it. Now some people can't afford the medications they need. Do the lawyers care about benefiting society? Hardly...

In both situations it boils down to everyone suffering because of a select group of greedy ass individuals... whether it be financial greed or otherwise.

Don't worry, if the "fundamentalists" don't stop it, the lawyers will eventually make it unaffordable for the general public anyway.

Your cynicism towards religion is disheartning, but at least you are consistant.
 
Last edited:
beefcake28 said:
It is no different than lawyers causing the price of prescription drugs to skyrocket because of all the frivolous lawsuits they instigate trying to exploit the system to the fullest... at the expense of everyone else. It isn't the drug companies that lose out on the big settlements, they just raise their prices to cover it. Now some people can't afford the medications they need. Do the lawyers care about benefiting society? Hardly...

In both situations it boils down to everyone suffering because of a select group of greedy ass individuals... whether it be financial greed or otherwise.

Don't worry, if the "fundamentalists" don't stop it, the lawyers will eventually make it unaffordable for the general public anyway.

Your cynicism towards religion is disheartning, but at least you are consistant.
Religion has a long history of impeding science, violating human rights and crushing free thinking in general. There are thousands of years of precedent backing up my cynicism. I agree product liability law needs to be modified.
 
JavaGuru said:
Religion has a long history of impeding science, violating human rights and crushing free thinking in general. There are thousands of years of precedent backing up my cynicism. I agree product liability law needs to be modified.

I agree completely regarding religion's history and it's effects on the advancement of civilization in general. I won't argue that one bit.

More recent history, however, has seen other spheres of influence having a similar effect on society... so I was simply questioning the exclusivity at which religion was deemed to be the only plausible deterrant to the use/ testing of nanotechnology, hence the comment about religious cynicism.
 
Top Bottom