Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

saw 2 towers screening today...

|NTRAMUSCULAR

New member
sorry had to brag...thats the only reason i went...kept me pretty entertained but 3 hours w/ no food? come on now....lots of good orc deaths though...thats all that matters...i'm jealous of orcs...they are born already muscular and they dont even have to work out...whats up w/ that shit?
 
HighIntensity said:
summon the geeks


if you can smoke some high grade pot and watch lord of the rings then come on here and say you didn't think it was great i'll buy you a dvd of your choice.
 
mylife said:
was it better than fellowship of the ring?


yeah i think it was much better...they didn't have to waste time introducing characters and got right into the action...didn't hurt that i also saw it in one of the nicest theaters in the state...all done up w/ surround sound and more speakers than i could count....and i saw the first on in a mono theater...
 
I read in Time magazine that this one had no prologue or recap. If you haven't seen the first one, don't bother coming. Plus, this one is action packed. The first was more mellow and even light at times. Two Towers will have neither.
 
PHATchik said:
I read in Time magazine that this one had no prologue or recap. If you haven't seen the first one, don't bother coming. Plus, this one is action packed. The first was more mellow and even light at times. Two Towers will have neither.

That isnt a problem if you think about it though.. its a Triliogy.. Its supposed to be seen together.. that would be like watching Empire strikes back, before watching Star Wars... tsk tsk tsk...
 
remember - these things are based on a trillogy of books. They are technically one big book - but were published over time.

the movies are just taken exactly from the books - so since there is no prologue or recap in the books, then there will be nothing in the movies either.

in the books, it is done like most stories - the initial part is there to establish character identity and expose the theme of the rest of the book.
the second part of the book is how they then move towards the end goal and exposes the actions on the motivations established in the first part.
and then the last book obviously has to contain the climax and then the denouement.

much in the way that Barry Manilow has a basic format for writing hit songs - pretty much any non-fiction writer follows the same basic theme as well - but the lord of the rings is long, so it is spread out more than the average pulp fiction.

also, I think it is great that the director is basically just translating the books directly to the screen and not dumbing it down the hollywood way (so that they don't do what you were mentioning and have explainations and flashbacks in there to makeup for the people that didn't see the others).
 
Drunken_Weasel said:


That isnt a problem if you think about it though.. its a Triliogy.. Its supposed to be seen together.. that would be like watching Empire strikes back, before watching Star Wars... tsk tsk tsk...


Yes, they are part of a trilogy. However, normally, there is a prologue. BTW, the Star Wars movies had the scrolling prologue. :)
 
PHATchik said:



Yes, they are part of a trilogy. However, normally, there is a prologue. BTW, the Star Wars movies had the scrolling prologue. :)

Yeah, I forgot about the Star Wars having a prologue.. but.. it truly isnt necessary..
 
I'm impressed by Happy comparing Tolkein's work to that of the minstrel Manilow. And no one jumped him for it.

No - I'm more impressed by the latter.
 
HappyScrappy said:
remember - these things are based on a trillogy of books. They are technically one big book - but were published over time.

the movies are just taken exactly from the books - so since there is no prologue or recap in the books, then there will be nothing in the movies either.

in the books, it is done like most stories - the initial part is there to establish character identity and expose the theme of the rest of the book.
the second part of the book is how they then move towards the end goal and exposes the actions on the motivations established in the first part.
and then the last book obviously has to contain the climax and then the denouement.

much in the way that Barry Manilow has a basic format for writing hit songs - pretty much any non-fiction writer follows the same basic theme as well - but the lord of the rings is long, so it is spread out more than the average pulp fiction.

also, I think it is great that the director is basically just translating the books directly to the screen and not dumbing it down the hollywood way (so that they don't do what you were mentioning and have explainations and flashbacks in there to makeup for the people that didn't see the others).

Good points made there:)
 
Top Bottom