Sarm s-4

[JSHORT2010]

How come the S-4 SARM is the most popular among bodybuilders? On wiki, it said was among the weaker anabolic SARMS.

 

[aj13]

probably coz its the most widely available sarm atm

I think its also had alot more money from pharmaceuticals put into it and quite a bit of research.... seems to have less sides than the others (aside from the vision) and be very effective... iv read a bit about the other SARMS and just heard that they are inferior products..

 

[JSHORT2010]

I'm guessing it has to do with availability, just as thatbloke suggested. After all, the other SARMS aren't available for sale anywhere.

Why though is it now being discontinued for development while other SARMS are being pursued? If side effects are ok, then it should still have some value.

 

[Carlito B]

I'm guessing it has to do with availability, just as thatbloke suggested. After all, the other SARMS aren't available for sale anywhere.

Why though is it now being discontinued for development while other SARMS are being pursued? If side effects are ok, then it should still have some value.

Is being discontinued maybe because of its potential for abuse and because it is more of an anabolic than what it was intended to be, an HRT replacement for synthetic testosterone. The current SARM and the new and upcoming S1174 can not replace testosterone because neither one increases LH or test levels only mimics its anabolic actions while synthetic testosterone can at least increase levels temporarily it seems now to be a better choice for HRT.

The new s1174 should be a lot better than the current S-4 , it requires 3mg to 5mg daily and also does not cause any negative side effects based on recent clinical trials ( see Ostarine )

 

[JSHORT2010]

Ostarine has been discontinued as well. It did look somewhat decent, being able to increase LM by 1.4 kg in three months with increased muscle functionality in one large study (with no side effects).

S-4 wouldn't be discontinued for its abuse potential since compared to the other SARMS it has less anabolic effect.

 

[RADAR]

Is being discontinued maybe because of its potential for abuse and because it is more of an anabolic than what it was intended to be, an HRT replacement for synthetic testosterone. The current SARM and the new and upcoming S1174 can not replace testosterone because neither one increases LH or test levels only mimics its anabolic actions while synthetic testosterone can at least increase levels temporarily it seems now to be a better choice for HRT.

The new s1174 should be a lot better than the current S-4 , it requires 3mg to 5mg daily and also does not cause any negative side effects based on recent clinical trials ( see Ostarine )

Man! I hate to hear that, it had alot of positive effects on the body, this S1174 is gonna have one hell of a reputation to uphold.

 

[Carlito B]

Man! I hate to hear that, it had alot of positive effects on the body, this S1174 is gonna have one hell of a reputation to uphold.

Do not get me wrong, the S-4 still has positive effects on the body.

Both the S-4 and Ostarine are similar in their structure with the difference of a cyano substitution on the phenyl rings.

Is true GTX abandoned their Ostarine project which makes it "ok" to sell it as research chem.

 

[JSHORT2010]

They maybe rejects, but if Ostarine can increase muscle mass by 1.4 kg and improve muscle performance without side effects, I suspect most would buy it (most individuals buy creatine which gives about the same effects).

On the other hand, I haven't seen this chem sold anywhere (even as a research chem).

 

[JSHORT2010]

I'd imagine the reason was due to the fact that they know it can't compete with the other SARMs which are currently being developed. 1.4 kg isn't that large an increase in muscle mass after all.

 

[Carlito B]

Ostarine should be better because it may not cause any vision sides and still can promote same anabolic actions.

 

[truckdaddy]

I think the s4 is amazing.....If the new one is even better, I can t wait.

 

[JSHORT2010]

Yeah the new one appears to have no sides, which is its biggest asset I think.

So far S-4 is the only SARM available anywhere (I think). The new one will probably be around eventually though as its no longer being developed by GTX.

 

[Carlito B]

Yeah the new one appears to have no sides, which is its biggest asset I think.

So far S-4 is the only SARM available anywhere (I think). The new one will probably be around eventually though as its no longer being developed by GTX.

Ostarine AKA MK-2866 or s1174 will be available at the end of this month on another forum, maybe Sarmssearch will carry it too.
They even posted the HPLC and it is MK-2866!

 

[Blaster22]

Carlito, can u pm me where it is available. I love the current one from our sponsor but if I can get it without the sides I'll take it.

 

[d_rson]

Can someone explain why SarmsInfo.com says that ostarine is:
S-3-(4-acetylamino-phenoxy)-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(4-nitro-3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-propionamide

And SarmsSearch's S-4 is : S-3-(4-acetylamino-phenoxy)-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(4-nitro-3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-propionamide

Same thing. So according to Sarmsinfo.com, Ostarine is being sold by SarmsSearch now.

 

[Carlito B]

Can someone explain why SarmsInfo.com says that ostarine is:
S-3-(4-acetylamino-phenoxy)-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(4-nitro-3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-propionamide

And SarmsSearch's S-4 is : S-3-(4-acetylamino-phenoxy)-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(4-nitro-3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-propionamide

Same thing. So according to Sarmsinfo.com, Ostarine is being sold by SarmsSearch now.

sarmsinfo is wrong but is not their fault as they posted that info a while back when everyone thought S4 was Ostarine , I guess they have not updated it yet.