Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Pics of GUNTER SCHLIERKAMP and Ronnie Coleman from the gnc Show of strength

I thought Coleman got his gyno fixed. Looks like it's back -- bad.

Dude must eat a bowl of d-bol for breakfast every morning.
 
Gunter may have been technically bigger and/or more ripped but Coleman has a quality about him that drugs nor diet nor trainig can give you, though he needs all of that to look how he does.

His body has a sense of proportion and his muscles just pop out more. Some people would say that his joints are smaller and I agree but it's not that it entirely.

Gunter is a big man and yes his muscles are bigger but look at the difference in size between the joints and the muscle bellies. Ronnie just has that huge increase in size where Gunter's joints are way bigger so the muscles don't look as large in proportion. And no amount of drugs, lifting, or dieting will change that.

THAT is why Ronnie keeps winning Olympias. Because of his genetics. And nobody on the BBing scene has anything even close to that magic quality that Ronnie has.

I'm neither a Ronnie fan nor a hater. I just recognize the truth. The Olympia is the best judged show in the world with judges that are able to detect the rare qualities that make a body truly look great and Ronnie has those qualities. Dorian had them, Arnold had them. After looking at LOTS of pictures you eventually start to see what the judges see.

JC
 
one member said gunter looked sick on the side tricep pose, if you look at the fuckin pic ronnie blows his ass away on that pose, gunters tricep cant even measure up to ronnies, look at the pic bro, gunter maybe has half the muscle mass and shape in the tricep compared to ronnie.
 
I believe that whether or not you prefer one type of shape (Ronnie's magic quality i.e.) or another is a matter of opinion. And to hear it stated as fact that one is better, is a little upsetting.

Ronnie has bigger triceps, wider lats. Gunter has better conditioning. Ronnie looks very thick and massive. Gunter is also massive.

I don't know what it is, but it is my opinion that Gunter has his own magic look, that flows alot nicer than many pros of today. It kinda reminds me of Arnold, but with all the leg mass that Arnold needed (IMO). That, plus his dead-on conditioning would place him ahead of a smooth, more bloated Coleman.

Ronnie on his best day might well deserve the Olympia crown over Gunter's recent condition. But this wasn't that day.

Jacob
 
Thanks posting the link. I agree with PatBateman that ronny looked better at this contest (from the pictures presented) than at the O. Nice to see Gunter win one but both were impressive.
Ronny has one of the best backs in the business, his impressive back combined with his joint structure have got him a lot of wins in the past.
 
Top Bottom