Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

p0ink, Curious, (genuinely)

Those countries have never demonstrated the insanity that Saddam has. Those countries have shown nothing but absolute restraint with their nukes, especially Israel. Saddam is a madman who would use a nuke against the US or Europe.
-------------------------------------------------

saddam gets his ass handed to him in the gulf war, retreats back across the border and waits out the last few days of his life. by your definition, bush is the nut case.

im sure he would love to see america go down. im sure alot of other ppl would too. we gonna jump nasty on north korea? nope, cause they could hurt us.

so we know north korea has a nuke, and we leave them alone. but were pretty damn sure iraq has one, so were gonna haul 300,000 ppl over there to fuck him up. doesnt anyone else see an incongruity here?
 
Sinistar said:
Those countries have never demonstrated the insanity that Saddam has. Those countries have shown nothing but absolute restraint with their nukes, especially Israel. Saddam is a madman who would use a nuke against the US or Europe.
-------------------------------------------------

saddam gets his ass handed to him in the gulf war, retreats back across the border and waits out the last few days of his life. by your definition, bush is the nut case.

im sure he would love to see america go down. im sure alot of other ppl would too. we gonna jump nasty on north korea? nope, cause they could hurt us.

so we know north korea has a nuke, and we leave them alone. but were pretty damn sure iraq has one, so were gonna haul 300,000 ppl over there to fuck him up. doesnt anyone else see an incongruity here?

Are you privy to american foreign policy plans? What makes you so sure that we are going to ignore N.Korea?
 
Top Bottom