Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES UGL OZ
Raptor Labs UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIES UGL OZUGFREAKRaptor LabsOxygenPharm

Our administration lied to us.

75th

ololollllolloolloloolllol
EF VIP
We staged a pre-emptive attack on a foreign, sovereign nation.

Our main goal was to apply a regime change in a country that was of no forseeable harm to us whatsoever. Why did the American people support it? Because we were presented false information by our leaders saying that the country's leader was an imminent threat.

Slobodan Milosevic wasn't even a hypothetical, long-term threat. So, why did we attack?
 
Last edited:
Y_Lifter said:
I thought the UN attacked them bitches ?
It was, we mostly bombed the shit outta them. My memory is mushy, but I seem to remember that not one US soldier died on the ground.
Lets also remember those sneaky serbs started some World War action, so I think it was good to nip that one in the bud.
 
jestros said:
HA HA HA HA, o your a funny one.
Hmm, how many americans died over there I cant remember...
The answer alex is zero.
 
75th said:
We staged a pre-emptive attack on a foreign, sovereign nation.

Our main goal was to apply a regime change in a country that was of no forseeable harm to us whatsoever. Why did the American people support it? Because we were presented false information by our leaders saying that the country's leader was an imminent threat.

Slobodan Milosevic wasn't even a hypothetical, long-term threat. So, why did we attack?
Systematic genocide is okay with you?

Plus it was sanctioned by the UN.
 
75th said:
We staged a pre-emptive attack on a foreign, sovereign nation.

Our main goal was to apply a regime change in a country that was of no forseeable harm to us whatsoever. Why did the American people support it? Because we were presented false information by our leaders saying that the country's leader was an imminent threat.

Slobodan Milosevic wasn't even a hypothetical, long-term threat. So, why did we attack?


Is this why the world hates us?
 
WODIN said:
Systematic genocide is okay with you?

Plus it was sanctioned by the UN.
Do you actually want to compare the totals bor between Iraq and the other?

Not even close
 
JerseyArt said:
Do you actually want to compare the totals bor between Iraq and the other?

Not even close
You mean the total serbs killed vs. the total iraqies killed?

By US military fire?

Go ahead tell me genius.
 
No, you're incorrect.
The Iraqi navy was poised to strike our shores at any
minute before the invasion...;)
 
Strikes against Yoguslavia and in Serbia were a joint NATO and UN effort to stop genocide and ethnic cleansing in the region. Iraq on the other hand is a blunder, think of it as Vietnam.
 
75th said:
We staged a pre-emptive attack on a foreign, sovereign nation.

Our main goal was to apply a regime change in a country that was of no forseeable harm to us whatsoever. Why did the American people support it? Because we were presented false information by our leaders saying that the country's leader was an imminent threat.

Slobodan Milosevic wasn't even a hypothetical, long-term threat. So, why did we attack?
People are too dumb and they will believe anything the president will tell them. The sheep need a leader, and that's Bush.
 
75th said:
Slobodan Milosevic wasn't even a hypothetical, long-term threat. So, why did we attack?

Ask the guys in the PNAC, they were extremely hawkish about our involvement in the various Yugoslavian crises. Don't try to blame this one on the liberals.
 
WODIN said:
Plus it was sanctioned by the UN.

According to numerous UN resolutions, so is the current Iraqi war.
 
Last edited:
75th I love your avatar. Just 4 more years and we get rid of those little blue tumors.
 
djufo said:
75th I love your avatar. Just 4 more years and we get rid of those little blue tumors.

Thanks. I didnt even vote for Bush, but I just like how my avatar pisses a lot of people off.
 
LOL

..in the words of Mr. Black


My government has always lied to me....im comfortable iwththat
 
How did the clinton Admin lie about Serbia. They said we were going in on a joint nato/un conflict to stop a genocide. There was in fact a genocide occuring. It's not like they got there and didn't find any mass graves. Didn't see Bill Cliton wondering around the oval office looking for a Mass Grave as a comedy bit for the Press Corp. Dinner did ya?
 
75th said:
We staged a pre-emptive attack on a foreign, sovereign nation.

Our main goal was to apply a regime change in a country that was of no forseeable harm to us whatsoever. Why did the American people support it? Because we were presented false information by our leaders saying that the country's leader was an imminent threat.

Slobodan Milosevic wasn't even a hypothetical, long-term threat. So, why did we attack?

I'm not really disputing you, since you seem like a pretty honest dude. But do you have any links supporting your statement? I don't recall Slick Willie ever saying such a thing. I was under the impression that it was more of a poor attempt at a humanitairan mission.
 
Clinton was a lying sack of shit, maybe not as bad as Bush, he was still a fucker....but of course you wont ever hear the democrats criticize him.....they think only the republican's shit stinks and not their own
 
I was watching the news a while ago and they put the video sayin "I did not have sexual relation with that woman" That guy is scary...Can be a worse president than that?
 
WODIN said:
Systematic genocide is okay with you?

Plus it was sanctioned by the UN.
slobo was wiping out muslims if I recall correctly
the balkans is the "front" against Islamic expansion into europe
sure many EU countries are riddled with a large islamic populace
but the balkans is where the white manhas to make a stand
man I wish I could live 200 years just to watch the history unfold
 
The Nature Boy said:
I'm not really disputing you, since you seem like a pretty honest dude. But do you have any links supporting your statement? I don't recall Slick Willie ever saying such a thing. I was under the impression that it was more of a poor attempt at a humanitairan mission.

To the best of my recollection, it was mainly Ms. Albright who spouted a lot of this info. Ill see if I can get some good examples.
 
djufo said:
I was watching the news a while ago and they put the video sayin "I did not have sexual relation with that woman" That guy is scary...Can be a worse president than that?
hmmm... it will be hard but i might be able to think of an example.

did the blow job effect the way he ran the country?

lying about some chick on the side is one thing.....lying and getting kids killed is another and if you dont see that ...well...http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.php
 
WODIN said:
Systematic genocide is okay with you?

Plus it was sanctioned by the UN.


Systematic genocide???? how many civilian(or even other) bodies were found in the last 5 years to make it a systematic genocide???? (these bodies dont count though http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/europe/9904/15/nato.attack.02/ )

and it was certainly NOT sanctioned by the UN, unless u think of NATO as UN, and even inside NATO there was a split about it
 
Milosevic is going to be found innocent of systematic genocide...Albright and Clinton purposely lied about the number of deaths to rally support from the american people and international community. The official NATO and UN reports show numbers significantly lower than what stated........what was happening in Yugoslavia was a civil war with atrocities commited on all sides but of course people like a black and white story so everything has been pinned on Milosevic......if you look at the on going trials more Croatians are on trial than Milosevic, the Croats were worse than the Serbs, the only difference was Clinton supported the Croats
 
75th said:
To the best of my recollection, it was mainly Ms. Albright who spouted a lot of this info. Ill see if I can get some good examples.

Wolfowitz, Perle, Kristol, and the other PNAC creeps were singing in the chorus along with Ms. Albright.
 
nzafi said:
Milosevic is going to be found innocent of systematic genocide...Albright and Clinton purposely lied about the number of deaths to rally support from the american people and international community. The official NATO and UN reports show numbers significantly lower than what stated........what was happening in Yugoslavia was a civil war with atrocities commited on all sides but of course people like a black and white story so everything has been pinned on Milosevic......if you look at the on going trials more Croatians are on trial than Milosevic, the Croats were worse than the Serbs, the only difference was Clinton supported the Croats
quoting u.n. info when its aligned with the agenda ....wow
 
PERFECTWORLD said:
quoting u.n. info when its aligned with the agenda ....wow

Aligned with the agenda?the UN and NATO did/supported the bombing and their neighbors contradict what the were screaming about genocide.....how is that aligned with the agenda if their own numbers contradict what they were saying
 
nzafi said:
Aligned with the agenda?the UN and NATO did/supported the bombing and their neighbors contradict what the were screaming about genocide.....how is that aligned with the agenda if their own numbers contradict what they were saying

Duh, only those who disagree with you can quote facts. When you and I do, it always comes back to the source either being unreliable and/or biased.
 
WODIN said:
How did the clinton Admin lie about Serbia. They said we were going in on a joint nato/un conflict to stop a genocide. There was in fact a genocide occuring. It's not like they got there and didn't find any mass graves. Didn't see Bill Cliton wondering around the oval office looking for a Mass Grave as a comedy bit for the Press Corp. Dinner did ya?
No answer on this one? Why?

Cuz it shows this thread is a lie. HA HA
 
WODIN said:
No answer on this one? Why?

Cuz it shows this thread is a lie. HA HA

#31 and 33.
 
Top Bottom