Hey has anybody done orals for HRT? We have some guys who really dont want to pin themselves and test cream bites,any ideas. Im not talking about anabolic doses just simple HRT amounts. Lets say 25mg/day winny, or 25 mg priviron.
Yes, and alot of people are in a particular field and think they know more than they do.Yo d-rson I OWN A REJUVENATION CLINIC , you want to talk about what I know! Shit people ger on here who dont know crap and want to try and show how smart they really aren'nt! Simply asking if anyone has tried very low dose orals for en extended period of time. O f course I know all the problems associated with long term HEAVY oral use.
Key word "derived", hell anti-venom is derived from venom does that mean its safe or a replacement for?Yes I understand the R in replacement as with any exogenous testosterone or other compound which are ALL derived from testosterone.
Proviron is NOT methylated, it is easy on the liver. Bad example. No offense, you should know this if you own a Rejuv house. And proviron is a support compound which loses its effectiveness over time, it is not a replacement for testosterone - it does not feature the attributes one expects from replacement therapy. It is also a DHT. Same with Winny. You're going to do HRT with a DHT compound.We have an endo and a compounding pharmacist working for us so we are well infomed. We have done blood tests after 3 months of proviron ( masterolone ) with no significant change in liver function or anything else. This was with 50 mg per day. Im asking if anybody has done this for a longer period of time? Yes I understand the R in replacement as with any exogenous testosterone or other compound which are ALL derived from testosterone.
I would imagine not all of your patients are completely shutdown. And you keep refering to ALL AAS as being test, and IT IS NOT. Please get that straight. Testosterone is the ONLY one that is Test. Anadrol, Dbol, tbol, winny, etc, are NOT test.As I see it all test no matter what the delivery will shut down natural test but we really are not concerned about that since test levels are really low anyway.
Except for what the body expects - test.Also with any drug your body will build up a tolerance to it over time.
Yeah, that would be great - subject your patients to all different side effects and differing performance.This is another reason we are looking at different compounds,lets say Proviron for 3 to 6 months then Andriol 3 to 6 months.
The diseases/conditions that these drugs are designed for are much worse than worries of liver problems, and the patients are constantly monitored AND cycled on and off the drugs.I find it strange that schering would market this drug if it was so toxic to the liver,
Primo is a DHB, and while it is a great addition to TRT, it's not TRT.we have not even talked about primo.
HRT/TRT is nothing new, so you don't think this has been discussed in detail a million times? There is no equitable replacement for Testosterone replacement except for some form of testosterone. The most current research is in SARMS, but that's still a ways away, because even SARMS are still not replacing all the aspects lost when test is low.Hey just throwing things out to see if anybody has done this.
The solution for that is Test Undecaonate. 4 shots a year. If they can't take 4 shots a year, then it must not be that important to them.believe blue cross is no longer paying for test cream,and its quite expensive so guys who wont pin themslves or have someone do it may just say screw it.
TU would be the bomb for TRT, too bad out FDA is so anal and holding up approval doing to the rare case of an oil embolism. Whats strange is I would think the risk of an oil embolism would be the same for any oil based AAS. Sounds like the FDA is just jacking around the maker on this one.The solution for that is Test Undecaonate. 4 shots a year.
I would imagine not all of your patients are completely shutdown. And you keep refering to ALL AAS as being test, and IT IS NOT. Please get that straight. Testosterone is the ONLY one that is Test. Anadrol, Dbol, tbol, winny, etc, are NOT test.
Except for what the body expects - test.
Yeah, that would be great - subject your patients to all different side effects and differing performance.
The diseases/conditions that these drugs are designed for are much worse than worries of liver problems, and the patients are constantly monitored AND cycled on and off the drugs.
Primo is a DHB, and while it is a great addition to TRT, it's not TRT.
HRT/TRT is nothing new, so you don't think this has been discussed in detail a million times? There is no equitable replacement for Testosterone replacement except for some form of testosterone. The most current research is in SARMS, but that's still a ways away, because even SARMS are still not replacing all the aspects lost when test is low.
The solution for that is Test Undecaonate. 4 shots a year. If they can't take 4 shots a year, then it must not be that important to them.
Hilarious. But you can't answer my question. Other than Andriol, which requires constant dosage patterns during the day for stable blood levels - and it's absorbtion rate is inconsistant - other than andriol, what oral TRT are you thinking? I'd be interested in hearing why you think such oral equates to replacement testosterone.So after further study and threads from other boards I do believe oral TRT is possible. Yes it may stress the liver a little but with a good dose of milk thistle it should be fine(remember we are talking TRT doses not cycle), Hey nothing is perfect, actually orals have an advantage over injectibles in that they have a more even delivery without the highs and lows. Creams are expensive with skin irritation and possible transfer to your partner.. Bayer Schering uses Proviron and Andriol in other countries for TRT for years .We are using Nebido( test un) and it seems to work well and yes hopefully the US will allow it but my last info was that for now its not. Maybe becuase you take 1000 mg in a 4cc shot at one time is the reason. We are in the Dominican Republic an its all good here!!
Curious, enlighten me.Ok so tell me why a major company for years now is selling orals TRT .? May be you know more than they do!
Test lonzenges suck. Poor, inaccurate delivery. FDA approved? I would't put stock in the fact that if the FDA approves it, it works.Well how is it that the FDA I believe has permitted oral test lonzenges to be used for TRT? I never said we should use other hormones for TRT other than major pharmacuitical companies in other countrires are.As far as daily doses I do believe creams need to be applied at least twice a day. And really if lets say Proviron helps with labido muscle wasting and general out look on life it sounds about like what testosterone does.
Bottom line I think is that orals can compliment the usage of test but will never replace Test itself and its benefits...
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 














