I'm reading the book The World is Flat by Thomas Friedmann, and he points out something that is so obvious yet due to so many things going on, we don't notice.
Like I mean, online culture and identity are meshing more and more. Online dating has elevated to 17 million people or 26% of US culture. Think about how hard it is to meet people IRL, when everyone is on their Blackberry/Iphone, talking, or surfing the web. I mean I have used a cheesy online dating thing to meet two chics who i relate to way more than chics I have met on the Undergrad level through School. However, there are issues related to the expansion of this medium and how it interrelates to our personal, private selves.
Everyone is in their own world, and actual conversation to the person next to U is very unlikely. I mean I find from personal experience I relate more to alot of U more than I do people I share the same geographical. Point is that I relate through this medium more than I do with peeps who I have the same job, and share the same geographical space with.
The thing is the increased interconnection is also kinda scary. I mean what happens when the entire world knows bout your private self. Think about it, when was the last time U heard a cell phone convo with people and they are discussing shit U would never say to a stranger.
Your neighbors may overhear a conversation U had with your wife about impotence or your conversation about weird sexual fantasies or worse and post it online.
For example right now, companies are googling your name, searching your my space page -I don't have one- to get a clue about your narrative, or what u are about, or other things U have done in your past. The thing is, according to a study done in 2006, 1/3 of peeps denied, was to internet related activity. The internet was the Scarlet Letter.
The things is, the whole reputation thing for kids growing up today, now starts much earlier. If U have kids, teach them about the world we live in and not to post up stupid shit that may ruin their career.
This book was written in 2007, and already I notice that a difference that it seems culture is alot more internet dependent than when he wrote this book.
I don't expect to get many posts, cause this isn't a question, but just an observation.
Thanx.
Like I mean, online culture and identity are meshing more and more. Online dating has elevated to 17 million people or 26% of US culture. Think about how hard it is to meet people IRL, when everyone is on their Blackberry/Iphone, talking, or surfing the web. I mean I have used a cheesy online dating thing to meet two chics who i relate to way more than chics I have met on the Undergrad level through School. However, there are issues related to the expansion of this medium and how it interrelates to our personal, private selves.
Everyone is in their own world, and actual conversation to the person next to U is very unlikely. I mean I find from personal experience I relate more to alot of U more than I do people I share the same geographical. Point is that I relate through this medium more than I do with peeps who I have the same job, and share the same geographical space with.
The thing is the increased interconnection is also kinda scary. I mean what happens when the entire world knows bout your private self. Think about it, when was the last time U heard a cell phone convo with people and they are discussing shit U would never say to a stranger.
Your neighbors may overhear a conversation U had with your wife about impotence or your conversation about weird sexual fantasies or worse and post it online.
For example right now, companies are googling your name, searching your my space page -I don't have one- to get a clue about your narrative, or what u are about, or other things U have done in your past. The thing is, according to a study done in 2006, 1/3 of peeps denied, was to internet related activity. The internet was the Scarlet Letter.
The things is, the whole reputation thing for kids growing up today, now starts much earlier. If U have kids, teach them about the world we live in and not to post up stupid shit that may ruin their career.
This book was written in 2007, and already I notice that a difference that it seems culture is alot more internet dependent than when he wrote this book.
I don't expect to get many posts, cause this isn't a question, but just an observation.
Thanx.

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 











