Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below I see O.J.'s road rage trial started today. They said that when O.J. killed his wife before, he was juicing back then. I just wonder if this is another case of "roid rage" with him the way he spazzed out on that guy and ripped his sunglasses off. I don't know about ya'll but I wouldn't mind seeing his sorry ass go for a ride. His ass would be good for jail, if you know what I mean. What do you guys think about the low life?
O.J. Simpson facing jail time again.
- Thread starter ironone1
- Start date
ultragainz
New member
him on roids???sure
ultragainz
New member
bro he cnat be on roids maybe when he played football maybe he tried them then...but he is not on roids...and roids really dont cause a rage...
FreakMonster
New member
ironone1 said:
He's just a really fucked up individual. He really is a wierd bird!!
I hope they lock his sorry ass up and throw away the key.
That criminal trial was absurd and the jury made our entire judicial system look bad. Let's see, the victims' blood all over his car and socks in his bedroom, his blood at the murder scene. Based on DNA evidence, the chance that it wasn't his blood was like 7 billion to 1, and there are only about 3 billion people on the planet. His abusive history. And that's just the beginning of the evidence.
Reasonable doubt my ass.
I hope he gets sent to prison, forgets to bring his soap on a rope, and gets a daily ass pounding by a 400 lb. man named Seth with no reacharound.
That criminal trial was absurd and the jury made our entire judicial system look bad. Let's see, the victims' blood all over his car and socks in his bedroom, his blood at the murder scene. Based on DNA evidence, the chance that it wasn't his blood was like 7 billion to 1, and there are only about 3 billion people on the planet. His abusive history. And that's just the beginning of the evidence.
Reasonable doubt my ass.
I hope he gets sent to prison, forgets to bring his soap on a rope, and gets a daily ass pounding by a 400 lb. man named Seth with no reacharound.
You're forgetting about Johnny Cochran and the Chewbocka factor...
Chewbocka lives on Endorr.
Ewoks live on Endorr.
Chewbocka is a Wookie.
Now why would a Wookie want to live on the same planet as a bunch of Ewoks???
It DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.
A Wookie, and a bunch of Ewoks...
It DOESN't MAKE SENSE.
If Chewbocka is a Wooky you MUST AQUIT!
Chewbocka lives on Endorr.
Ewoks live on Endorr.
Chewbocka is a Wookie.
Now why would a Wookie want to live on the same planet as a bunch of Ewoks???
It DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.
A Wookie, and a bunch of Ewoks...
It DOESN't MAKE SENSE.
If Chewbocka is a Wooky you MUST AQUIT!
F
Frackal
Guest
Bull fucking shit. If he gets off due to roid rage I'll fuckin..I'll fuckin...I'll fucking be really pissed! I hate it when they blame it on AAS. That's worse than blaming it on alcohol.
Bigsatan13
New member
I never give him much thought,but alot of dumbass white sluts line up to be with him!
Ercole
New member
Coke, not AS
I don't know if OJ has used gear since his football days, but it's well-known that he is a MAJOR cokehead. No question he was blasted on coke when he kiled Ron and Nicole.
I'll never forget the pictures in US Magazine (or PEOPLE or something like that) when he was finally released from jail. The magazine got an exclusive to take pictures of his welcome home party.
One picture showed OJ ariving at the party, looking tense and unhappy. Then, the article innocently explained, he went upstairs to have a "private talk" with friend Al Cowlings. THe next picture showed OJ and Al coming back downstairs ... OJ looks totally transformed, wired, eyes on fire. Almost as wasted as Whitney Houston in some recent appearances.
I don't know if OJ has used gear since his football days, but it's well-known that he is a MAJOR cokehead. No question he was blasted on coke when he kiled Ron and Nicole.
I'll never forget the pictures in US Magazine (or PEOPLE or something like that) when he was finally released from jail. The magazine got an exclusive to take pictures of his welcome home party.
One picture showed OJ ariving at the party, looking tense and unhappy. Then, the article innocently explained, he went upstairs to have a "private talk" with friend Al Cowlings. THe next picture showed OJ and Al coming back downstairs ... OJ looks totally transformed, wired, eyes on fire. Almost as wasted as Whitney Houston in some recent appearances.
you guys are crazy, do you think he killed those fools, nicole and faye resnick were in like $300,000.00 or more debt to columbian drug lords over cocaine.......and they were killed drug mafia style.........and if he goes to jail for reaching in and taking off a guys glasses then he is getting fucked royally!
You must of not watched the trial and seen all the evidence they had against him. Why do you think he lost the civil trial. You could of had him on tape and they still wouldn't of convicted him in South Central. No disrespect but you must be a damn fool to believe that. The mob doesn't do a messy job like that . That was a rage killing.
CN1 said:
You are right, we are fools. All that blood just got up on its own accord, ran across town and deposited itself all over the interior of OJ's car and his bedroom. And the blood brought the glove and dropped it off outside OJ's window. And gloves don't shrink when you soak them in blood, they actually expand, even when the gloves are a rare kind that OJ had himself bought?
Were you the foreman on the jury?
Is this a joke, or do you really believe that something like 30 or more police officers conspired to frame OJ for the murders? Because they are all racists, right? Even the minorities, those guys are racist against their own race, aren't they?
I just never seem to be able to wrap my brain around the concept that some people will believe what they want to believe no matter how much evidence they are shown to the contrary. It may literally be true that the criminal jury would have acquitted OJ even if he had been videotaped when committing the murders.
pgerardone
New member
Roid rage is a myth. When anyone that does anything violent and he uses steroids it is a good explanation to say roid rage. But what about all the violent things done by the majority of criminals who never have seen a steroid. What you have is a sort of reverse situation. People who take steroids are usually athletes who are normally more aggressive. If you are not violent or aggressive before using steroids you will not be after. Also you always have those idiots who take steroids and think they are suddenly supposed to act like a bad ass and expect to have roid rage so they go out, act like an ass and end up in fights. These are the same people who take 4 d-bols a day for three days, get gas from eating shitty food, and then come on here and say they have to stop taking their d-bol because their liver hurts. I laugh my ass off every time I read one of those stupid posts. These people sit around and wait for side effects.
hey bro its more like did you watch the trial, did you see they went through his bedroom at 4am and nothing on the floor, then on a video taken 1hour later there is this pair of socks just laying in the middle of the floor.......ohh and how does a glove show up and detective furman finds it with blood, and him and vanetter were there 2 hours before even reporting to other law enforcement,,,,,,,ohh and did I watch the trial......evidently you didnt because he was found not guilty.........do you think one man can cut up two people like that.........they said ron goldman struggled so hard that he dug a 2 ft hole in the ground of soil.....the only reason they fucked him on the civil trial is because of goldmans and nicoles parents......they forget nicole screwed and slept around enormously and did a shitload of cocaine which got her into trouble with that faye resnick bitch. Simpson couldnt do that to two people like that, he may know who did it but c'mon he didnt do it.....you didnt see the planted blood the cops put 0n the back gate of nicoles apartment.........and all the other planted shit........c'mon they had no suspects and no motives, so they wanted to get OJ......cause he was their scapegoat.....its bullshit! OJ's life has been ruined over it............and the families of the victims dont even think about the bullshit and dirt their siblings were doing!
Yes bro I watched the trial pretty closely. I'm an attorney and was practicing in Los Angeles at the time. As you can imagine, there was a lot of discussion about the trial among attorneys. I know and have worked with some prominent criminal defense attorneys in the area, and several of my friends from law school are deputy DAs. All of these lawyers, even the black ones, were convinced that OJ was guilty.
I think I'm pretty good at evaluating evidence and what it proves and doesn't prove, and I'm also pretty good at separating persuasive evidence from speculation and congecture.
I still find it hard to understand how anyone who closely followed the actual evidence wouldn't come to the conclusion of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Let's understand what "guilt beyond a reasonable doubt" means. It means that a jury may believe that a defendant probably is guilty, they could be almost certain of his guilt, but maybe there is some sliver of doubt. Personally, I had no doubt whatsoever that OJ was guilty.
What I believe happened is that the DA was foolish enough to choose downtown Los Angeles for the trial. The jury pool there is largely minorities, and includes a lot of people that have been treated very unfairly by some of the bad apples in the LAPD. Remember that this all occured in the wake of the Rodney King beating, the acquittals of the officers who beat him, and the riots.
OJ Simpson was more than just a hero to these jurors, which is what he was to me before the murders, he was more like a God. They couldn't bear to convict him. But they needed some reason to let him off, something to label "reasonable doubt", even if it was totally implausible. Well, Johnny Cochran and the rest of the dream team did a good job of giving them that reason in the face of overwhelming evidence of guilt. I don't think they are "bad lawyers", I think they are excellent lawyers. They did exactly what they get paid to do - zealously protect the interests of their clients.
Maybe the result shows how much the thinking of people is influenced by their race and experiences in life. I wonder if my opinions would have been different if I was a black man. I hope not.
I guess I shouldn't criticize you for reaching a different conclusion than I did, but I can't help myself, because dammit, your conclusion is wrong.
Remember that a civil jury in Santa Monica unanimously found that OJ had committed both murders and hit him with a multi million dollar judgment based on the what they described as overwhelming evidence against him. I had several court appearances at that courthouse during the trial and I sat in on it several times.
I felt like the criminal verdict was sort of a "payback" for the acquittals of the officers in the King beating. I think that is sad. Two wrongs don't make a right.
I think I'm pretty good at evaluating evidence and what it proves and doesn't prove, and I'm also pretty good at separating persuasive evidence from speculation and congecture.
I still find it hard to understand how anyone who closely followed the actual evidence wouldn't come to the conclusion of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Let's understand what "guilt beyond a reasonable doubt" means. It means that a jury may believe that a defendant probably is guilty, they could be almost certain of his guilt, but maybe there is some sliver of doubt. Personally, I had no doubt whatsoever that OJ was guilty.
What I believe happened is that the DA was foolish enough to choose downtown Los Angeles for the trial. The jury pool there is largely minorities, and includes a lot of people that have been treated very unfairly by some of the bad apples in the LAPD. Remember that this all occured in the wake of the Rodney King beating, the acquittals of the officers who beat him, and the riots.
OJ Simpson was more than just a hero to these jurors, which is what he was to me before the murders, he was more like a God. They couldn't bear to convict him. But they needed some reason to let him off, something to label "reasonable doubt", even if it was totally implausible. Well, Johnny Cochran and the rest of the dream team did a good job of giving them that reason in the face of overwhelming evidence of guilt. I don't think they are "bad lawyers", I think they are excellent lawyers. They did exactly what they get paid to do - zealously protect the interests of their clients.
Maybe the result shows how much the thinking of people is influenced by their race and experiences in life. I wonder if my opinions would have been different if I was a black man. I hope not.
I guess I shouldn't criticize you for reaching a different conclusion than I did, but I can't help myself, because dammit, your conclusion is wrong.
Remember that a civil jury in Santa Monica unanimously found that OJ had committed both murders and hit him with a multi million dollar judgment based on the what they described as overwhelming evidence against him. I had several court appearances at that courthouse during the trial and I sat in on it several times.
I felt like the criminal verdict was sort of a "payback" for the acquittals of the officers in the King beating. I think that is sad. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Ercole
New member
One born every minute
CN1 thinks OJ is innocent? Well, they say 15% of the U.S. public thinks Elvis is still alive. Ignorance is one resource we'll never run out of.
And the other poster talking about "the love of his life" "cheating" on him in "his house"? What are you smoking? She was his ex-wife. It was HER house, not his. How could she "cheat" if she was single? And furthermore, she wasn't having sex with Ron -- he was returning some glasses her party had left at his restaurant.
So many legends and lies have accumulated around this case, and are eagerly believed by people who don't think much of facts ... like the first jury! But that's another story ...
CN1 thinks OJ is innocent? Well, they say 15% of the U.S. public thinks Elvis is still alive. Ignorance is one resource we'll never run out of.
And the other poster talking about "the love of his life" "cheating" on him in "his house"? What are you smoking? She was his ex-wife. It was HER house, not his. How could she "cheat" if she was single? And furthermore, she wasn't having sex with Ron -- he was returning some glasses her party had left at his restaurant.
So many legends and lies have accumulated around this case, and are eagerly believed by people who don't think much of facts ... like the first jury! But that's another story ...
thesuperstar
New member
move to chat board.
OJ killed two people and is playing golf everyday, america is great.
OJ killed two people and is playing golf everyday, america is great.
I'm glad to see that the overwelming majority of the public is smart enough to realize that there is no doubt he is guilty as hell. He might of got off, but he'll never have the public's respect anymore, and he'll never get a job unless he's washing cars or being a golf caddy. He's in his own little prison now and could go there for real now. He should of settled out of court.
well T, your an attorney, Im not saying he is 100% innocent, maybe he and nicole were into some deep shit, and were in debt a grip of money, maybe some mafia connects had payed him a visit and told him he is going to die if he doesnt pay up, and maybe they held him at gunpoint, and told him he is going to have to help them kill nicole and whoever else in the house....or he would be killed......so maybe they took him in his bronco to bundy and made him help them slay the two victims, and then parked his bronco on the street and threw him over the wall where kato kaelin stayed, and maybe the loud bump was the group of guys throwing OJ over the wall after beating him up a bit, and maybe this is something that really happened.................I dont think OJ would commit cold-blooded murders like that at the spur of the moment.......if you notice I live in LA also, I always take friends that visit from out of town by the house on bundy.....I even have a picture of it!
Last edited:
CN1 sometimes I'm not sure whether or not you are serious. If you are, I think you are reaching too far to come up with some big conspiracy. Why don't you think OJ would do it? We know he had a history of beating her, stalking her, etc. I think you just don't WANT to believe it, so your heart is interfering with your normal reasoning. That is understandable, to some extent we all "believe what we want to believe" and tend to reject information that doesn't fit into our beliefs.
Consider this. If he really was innocent, why did he try to get away and hold a gun to his head. Innocent people generally don't act like that.
Also, innocent people very often testify at trial. OJ didn't take the stand because his lawyers didn't want the prosecutors to be able to cross examine him. The prosecutors aren't allowed to argue that refusing to take the stand indicates guilt, but I am.
I didn't want to think OJ would committ cold blooded murders either, but again the evidence against him was overwhelming. And the logistics that would have been involved in framing him rule that scenario out.
If I had been on that jury and couldn't get a conviction, I would have at least hung the jury and they could have retried him, maybe in Santa Monica, where the trial should have been venued in the first place.
Consider this. If he really was innocent, why did he try to get away and hold a gun to his head. Innocent people generally don't act like that.
Also, innocent people very often testify at trial. OJ didn't take the stand because his lawyers didn't want the prosecutors to be able to cross examine him. The prosecutors aren't allowed to argue that refusing to take the stand indicates guilt, but I am.
I didn't want to think OJ would committ cold blooded murders either, but again the evidence against him was overwhelming. And the logistics that would have been involved in framing him rule that scenario out.
If I had been on that jury and couldn't get a conviction, I would have at least hung the jury and they could have retried him, maybe in Santa Monica, where the trial should have been venued in the first place.
