Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Now available- PURE CREATINE ETHYL ESTER

Ulter said:
The research you're calling biased (without a clue) is from the University of Nebraska who is the current patented applied for holder. The University of Nebraska invented it.

You are very much behind the curve on this subject.

Surely if they invented it, then they are biased?
-You cannot use a single source from the inventors of the substance as iron clad proof!

I suggest that you re-read what I wrote. Even if this creatine did everything you said it does, the vast majority of people DO respond well to creatine monohydrate. It does not matter whether the creatine is better absorped, - if the muscles are maximally saturated with creatine, irrespective of how bioavailiable the creatine is, it will not be taken up by the muscles.

No creatine has been shown to enhance the amount of creatine that can possibly be taken up by the cells. However, if there was one substance that should be looked at more closely, it is tribasic sodium phosphate (use 2g per day). It is hypothesised to be a potential source of phosphates that could increase the amount of creatine taken up by the muscle, also dramatically lowering pH (2grams has the same effect as 0.2g/kg sodium bicarbinate in this regard, but without the stomach cramps). Phosphate loading increases the capacity to store intramuscular inorganic phosphates, which may permit a greater quantity of creatine phosphate to be stored for use during short-duration burst activity (Wolinski et al 2004)
 
Surely if they invented it, then they are biased?
-You cannot use a single source from the inventors of the substance as iron clad proof!

The University of Nebraska is not in the supplement business. They have no reason to skew any clinical research and it's ridiculous to say they would.

I suggest that you re-read what I wrote. Even if this creatine did everything you said it does, the vast majority of people DO respond well to creatine monohydrate. It does not matter whether the creatine is better absorped, - if the muscles are maximally saturated with creatine, irrespective of how bioavailiable the creatine is, it will not be taken up by the muscles.


I sold creatine monohydrate and stopped because people were not responding and subsequently stopped buying it. Since we've started selling CEE not a single person has complained about it and most are buying a 2nd and 3rd bottle.
If you like monohydrate so much use it. You've never used CEE and don't know what it's like so your unqualified to comment on the differences.
 
- I have conducted exercise physiology/sport nutrition trials when I was at unversity myself; and yes often university trials can be biassed - if you are looking for a particular result, it is more likely that you will see it. In order for something to be accepted by fellow scientists, a study must be published in a relevant sientific journal, and be peer reviewed. Even then, the effects will not be accepted as accepted knowledege, until many many other trials have been done confirming the results


If you like monohydrate so much use it. You've never used CEE and don't know what it's like so your unqualified to comment on the differences.[/QUOTE]

Well, good luck (I honestly mean that)
 
Last edited:
Macro, I know that is is best to experiment with different dosing schedules to find what works best for you. However, if strength-only gains for a workout were the only goal, and recovery is not a big issue, would you think a single dose pre-workout would be more effective than spread throughout the day? I realize similar questions have been asked before, but I ony want your guess/opinion.
 
DaveTSI said:
i experienced strength and slight weight gains in the first week on this stuff, but it kills my stomach, not pain, serious bloating. feels awful. is there anything i can do??

update: i have taken this twice (4 pills) before my previous two workouts, and it hasnt bothered my stomach. ill update again at the end of the week, im beginning to think it was a bug
 
SlimJim300 said:
Macro, I know that is is best to experiment with different dosing schedules to find what works best for you. However, if strength-only gains for a workout were the only goal, and recovery is not a big issue, would you think a single dose pre-workout would be more effective than spread throughout the day? I realize similar questions have been asked before, but I ony want your guess/opinion.

yes
 
I been takin CEE for a week now 4 caps a day 1 in the morning 1 noon and 2 before work out. Havent really noticed any big gains, I just feel like Im at my fullest every time I go in the gym. I never took any supplements before only AAS so my expectations might be too high.
 
Top Bottom