Mandinka2
New member
MattTheSkywalker said:I think the better bet is to address comprehensively the levee issue. It is easier to deal with preventing floods and draining water than to raise an entire city, right? (I am guessing here but it seems to make sense...)
Yes , raising a city is perhaps beyond even the US's ability .... especially considering global warming.
From my understanding many of the Bermuda based reinsurers are in trouble over this , XL Re , Partner Re etc. are all nat cat specialists but are of nothing like the size of Munich Re or Swiss Re.... interesting times ahead for the industry.... consider as well that this is only the START of the hurricane season .... you will see very big rate hikes in the near future I believe.MattTheSkywalker said:There is a federal flood insurance program that provides insurance for high risk flood areas (much of FL, etc). This program covers the first $250,000 in flood damage. By retaining that risk, the government makes it possible for private insurance to provide coverage at workable rates above and beyond that $250K. (Think of it as having a really high deductible to lower your payments, only you don't have to pay the deductible).
From an investing standpoint, what usually happens post-crisis is wealthy individuals and private equity corporations unveil insurance products to serve the new higher rate market. (This happened post 9/11; several bermuda based insurers came into existence). Since existing insurance companies have no choice but to raise rates, these new entities enter the market at lower (but still high) rates, and the new entities have no exisitng liabilities.