thebabydoc said:Matt:
I can TOTALLY see where you're coming from, just so long as you don't lose sight of who is going to benefit most from any ruling- Drunk drivers.
I personally am saving up to go after Scottsdale for their kangaroo traffic court where 98% of "defendants" are found guilty. Clearly that number is indefensible and provides for a prima facia/ ips respo loquitor case but I want to BURY them for every ticket they've written or collected on in the past 10 years. (Notice that DUI will NOT be affected because it is criminal and those that go to trial would not fall in the category of the kangaroo civil traffic court.) I figure a good case will run about $100K but we're gonna see about class action which might make some decent lawyers crawl out of the woodwork.
I understand the righteous indignation at the infinite authority given to police and the shit they get away with, but your $20K is directed at the wrong place.
You will not establish precedent with this case and as you said, any precedent you set will be zapped ASAP. DWI is a SERIOUS problem and a serious topic in this country. You need to address police abuse of power and, more specifically, this particular officer who felt within his rights to arrest you (given the circumstances YOU described for us).
Better precedent would be to send the message that when an officer abuses his power he will have to personally answer for it, either in court or, ahem, cough, cough, on a more personal level. I can assure you that $20,000 would have gotten a whole lot more effect spent elsewhere.
Good advice.