H
~HOUNDOG~
Guest
I have been meaning to write this letter for some time now and, in light of recent developments, I believe it is appropriate. The nitty-gritty of what I'm about to write is this: Mr. Satanic Goatslayer needs to stop living in denial. He needs to wake up and realize that as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, his habitués don't really care that he claims that society is supposed to be lenient towards sleazy whiners. That claim is preposterous and, to use Satanic's own language, overtly cranky. No history can justify it. Even if treasonous jerks join Satanic's band with the best of intentions, they will still impugn the patriotism of Satanic's opponents one day. Not all, I hasten to add, do join with the best of intentions. While we all despair over Satanic's noxious insinuations, we must also remember the principles that will guide our better behaviors and higher aspirations. Please keep in mind that Satanic has no conception of our moral and ethical standards. If he continues to cripple his enemies politically, economically, socially, morally, and psychologically, I will undeniably be obliged to do something about him. And you know me: I never neglect my obligations. Does he remember the hurt and hate in the eyes of the people he made fun of just so others would like him more? Even if he does, I'm sure he doesn't care, because I am not trying to save the world -- I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to disabuse him of the notion that merit is adequately measured by his methods and qualifications.
I know the following is a cheap shot, but by refusing to act, by refusing to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy, we are giving Satanic the power to twist the truth. Satanic, as usual, you prove yourself to be feeble-minded. It behooves us to remember that his sense of humor runs the gamut from rude and crude to wretched and grungy. No joke. His viewpoints occasionally differ in terms of how doctrinaire can they are, but generally share one fundamental tendency: They make us all miserable. Satanic makes it a point to discredit legitimate voices in the credentialism debate. You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement, but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation.
In public, he vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, he never fails to open the gates of hell. Is it not positively the distinguishing feature of Satanic's practices to repeat the mistakes of the past? Contrast, for example, Satanic's allegations with those of nugatory radicals, and observe that there is no contrast. I, by (genuine) contrast, take the view that Satanic thinks that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments. However, he has an uncritical -- almost a worshipful -- attitude toward what I call mingy troublemakers. Let me end by appealing to our collective sense of humanity: Mr. Satanic Goatslayer's lapdogs can read some crock of snotty drivel he once wrote and believe that they've read something really profound.
I know the following is a cheap shot, but by refusing to act, by refusing to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy, we are giving Satanic the power to twist the truth. Satanic, as usual, you prove yourself to be feeble-minded. It behooves us to remember that his sense of humor runs the gamut from rude and crude to wretched and grungy. No joke. His viewpoints occasionally differ in terms of how doctrinaire can they are, but generally share one fundamental tendency: They make us all miserable. Satanic makes it a point to discredit legitimate voices in the credentialism debate. You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement, but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation.
In public, he vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, he never fails to open the gates of hell. Is it not positively the distinguishing feature of Satanic's practices to repeat the mistakes of the past? Contrast, for example, Satanic's allegations with those of nugatory radicals, and observe that there is no contrast. I, by (genuine) contrast, take the view that Satanic thinks that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments. However, he has an uncritical -- almost a worshipful -- attitude toward what I call mingy troublemakers. Let me end by appealing to our collective sense of humanity: Mr. Satanic Goatslayer's lapdogs can read some crock of snotty drivel he once wrote and believe that they've read something really profound.

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 











