who do you consider to be more talented:
a) slipknot
b) metallica
HUMMMMMMMMMM, i wonder what the outcome would be....
Jitsuka, i really dont know why you continue posting, clearly this is a debate there is no chance in you coming out on top.
Metallica are superior....bottom line.
You just make contridictive statements and jump to conclusions without the slightest knowledge on the subject you are debating about.......you know dick about metal, from what i have read on here.
You constantly try to fire back at a previous statement mabe by W.p.h but he makes more sense than you do, well, not hard if you believe that slipknot are better than metallica, g n r or any other band he mentioned.
Really, slipknot do not have as much talent as James hetfield's left toe nail when it comes to making decent music.
If you disagree, try this.
Take someone who does not like metal or rock music, play for them nothing else matters or master of puppets and then any slipknot song becasue they are all crap, and ask them the following,
'which song did you like better?'
My father does not like heavy rock or metal, but appreciates the talent behind guns n' roses and metallica and enjoys most of their songs. But when he heard slipknot, he laughed at them...most people do, they are a gloryfied boy band targeting a popular trend as others have said on this thread and are fueled by the easily influenced teens that think it is cool to wear 'alternative' clothing and listen to such music.
Sorry to be harsh, but i have had enough of this bitchy crap being said by people who dont understand what talent is.